From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 27 13:24:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EB3E03EA1 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB7D72AD4; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (106-69-250-78.dyn.iinet.net.au [106.69.250.78]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v8RDOSib004448 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: [HEADUP] FLAVORS landing. To: Stefan Esser , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <91d1252c-5398-dca8-f337-959fa722efc7@freebsd.org> <5f2632cd-4c7c-c1e3-d4f9-292c5cfe90a1@freebsd.org> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:24:22 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5f2632cd-4c7c-c1e3-d4f9-292c5cfe90a1@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:24:34 -0000 On 27/9/17 8:17 pm, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer: >> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we >> quickly formalise some nomenclature >> or we will have 200 different ideas as to how to do the same thing; >> >> I would like to propose the following possible "examples of official" >> flavours: >> -nodocs         ..  nearly every port has a DOCS option..  a way to >> automatically turn it off globally and generate said pkgs would be good. >> -minimal ..  smallest possible feature set.. probably used just to >> satisfy some stupid dependency. >> -kitchensink    ..  speaks for itself .. options lit up like a christmas >> tree >> -runtime        ..  no .a files, include files, development >> documentation or sources .. >>                     might only contain a single libxx.so.N file, or a >> single binary executable. > No, these are no good examples for flavours, as I understand them ... why not? that's part of the problem here. It's not really defined.. sub packages?  flavours?  what's the difference? It's not defined and a dozen examples would go a long way to help. I know what I want..  that's to be able to populate my appliance without all the stuff I don't need. I also have a different requirement for my application build environment.  There I need all the includes etc. How I get there is still a mystery. > > These are possible typical sub-package categories, or rather you could > remove the DOCS from the base port, but offer a sub-package for them. > > > I'd rather think that NO-X11 might become a typical flavour, or the > dependency on a particular crypto library (e.g. openssl vs. libressl). > > > Regards, STefan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >