From owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Fri Jun 26 02:33:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB8898C083 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 02:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BCA1DEE for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 02:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2015 19:33:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,681,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="734928296" Received: from orsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.129]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2015 19:33:50 -0700 Received: from orsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.27]) by ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.15]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:33:48 -0700 From: "Moore, Robert" To: Anthony Jenkins , Ian Smith , Warner Losh CC: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPI CMOS region support rev. 6 Thread-Topic: [PATCH] ACPI CMOS region support rev. 6 Thread-Index: AQHQr62JbDTC/+JPd0KWbYZiTeAdwJ2+cUiA//+gMOA= Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 02:33:48 +0000 Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37D30820A@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20150222180817.GD27984@strugglingcoder.info> <54EB8C21.2080600@att.net> <2401337.2oUs7iAbtB@ralph.baldwin.cx> <54EF3D5D.4010106@att.net> <20150227222203.P38620@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20150228125857.D1277@besplex.bde.org> <54F14368.4020807@att.net> <20150302002647.W42658@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <54F5E53D.1090601@att.net> <20150306025800.U46361@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <54F9D7E6.4050807@att.net> <5504FF32.3020202@att.net> <20150317001401.X22641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <5506F00A.3030708@att.net> <5506FBE3.1000009@att.net> <20150317041624.K22641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <55073442.5060005@att.net> <20150317222704.K22641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <550825DE.7030406@att.net> <56B494A3-2058-4B7B-8183-646A46753A53@bsdimp.com> <5509A282.6070207@att.net> <20150319184348.X22641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <550ACAEC.3060808@att.net> <20150320002950.T22641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <550AD9B7.4090508@att.net> <558CA785.1050904@att.net> <558CA7C9.9000304@att.net> In-Reply-To: <558CA7C9.9000304@att.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.138] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 02:33:51 -0000 How do you handle the fact that there are three different CMOS/RTC devices = defined in the ACPI specification? (There are three different _HIDs). > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > acpi@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Jenkins > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 6:16 PM > To: Ian Smith; Warner Losh > Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI CMOS region support rev. 6 >=20 > ...and of course I forget the attachment... >=20 > On 06/25/15 21:14, Anthony Jenkins wrote: > > Sooo here's the new and improved rev. 6, "new and improved" because it > > increases the diff line count by 332%. > >> [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/src]$ wc -l atrtc_c_rev5.diff > >> atrtc_rev6.diff > >> 220 atrtc_c_rev5.diff > >> 731 atrtc_rev6.diff > > This is to satisfy the request to split the atrtc.c driver into a "core= " > > part and "bus" parts: > >> Looking at patch 5: > >> > >> You need to rework this so there's an atrtc_acpi.c. Put all the ACPI > attachment in there. You should also split off the little bit that's ISA- > specific into atrtc_isa. Once you do that, we can talk. > >> > >> Warner > > I actually finished this patch a couple months ago and have been > > running it on my laptop, I just don't see the point...maybe Warner > > could elaborate on the rationale for his request? At the very least, > > this should be two commits - the functional change and the > > refactorization request. > > > > I may have also added Ian's request for verbosity tweaks, but it's > > been a while... I don't see any CMOS logging noise FWIW. > > > > Thanks, > > Anthony > > > >