Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Mar 2011 18:13:21 -0800
From:      perryh@pluto.rain.com
To:        corky1951@comcast.net
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Superfluous dependencies
Message-ID:  <4d7c2841.Luv9s8bmxfYBYXYS%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110312221233.GD79028@comcast.net>
References:  <AANLkTik65O3gbUoVBM-YbjWu0dpq0OuNn2KoUaC5b5ov@mail.gmail.com> <4D76426A.2010006@secnap.com> <AANLkTi=j7fR%2BRm4Fy14Q_KPDyE%2B7%2BO_d3pd3Yaek=kJG@mail.gmail.com> <20110312215307.GB26099@lonesome.com> <20110312221233.GD79028@comcast.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> wrote:

> A few minutes ago, I was answering a post on the forums, in which
> a user expressed surprise (and outrage) that the phpmyadmin port
> was installing libX11 and similar things on his server.  By
> installing it myself and then using "pkg_tree -v" to examine the
> dependencies, I was able to narrow it down to two of the port's
> options that were ON by default.
>
> I'm not aware of any tool that will display a similar dependency
> tree for a port *before* it is installed.  "make all-depends-list"
> creates exactly what it suggests, a list, and doesn't show any
> of the hierarchical info that is needed to answer questions like
> the one I was working on.   If there is such a tool, I'd love to
> hear about it.

Would something along the lines of "make -n fetch-recursive"
help at all?  I would expect it to walk the dependency tree
in a predictable order.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4d7c2841.Luv9s8bmxfYBYXYS%perryh>