Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 May 2013 23:37:19 +0200
From:      Roland Smith <>
To:        Pol Hallen <>
Subject:   Re: filesystem advice
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:43:25PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all and sorry for this (newbie) question.
> I study FreeBSD (I come from linux) and I'm not sure which filesystem use.
> My situation: install a fileserver (samba) for 3 clients and put it as
> gateway/server on internet (ssh, and samba to internal lan).
> I installed FreeBSD with raid 1 following this howto:
> everything ok!
> I see that use ufs filesystem, now:
> I'd like have less maintenance possible direclty to machine because this
> server is far to me 50Km.
> So I can use ssh for default (and extra) maintenance.
> Which filesystem is "better"? After total crash of system (i.e.) or
> black-out, ufs can repair it by itself? Or better use ufs+journal? or zfs?

By default, FreeBSD 9.x uses journaled soft-updates now. This will cut down
the filesystem check time significantly. A filesystem check will require
manual intervention when some kinds of errors are found.=20

ZFS likes to have a lot of memory, and preferably a 64-bit machine. See the
tuning guide:

> Motherboard is atom dual core with 2Gb of ram and 2 disks with 2Gb each.

[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>