Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:45:40 +0300
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
To:        James <james@towardex.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: per-interface packet filters [summary]
Message-ID:  <20041215084540.GB53509@cell.sick.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20041214181231.GA80817@scylla.towardex.com>
References:  <20041213124051.GB32719@cell.sick.ru> <20041214015603.A75019@xorpc.icir.org> <20041214060341.A77720@xorpc.icir.org> <41BEF746.E8362858@freebsd.org> <20041214063118.B77933@xorpc.icir.org> <41BF07A3.8F1F505E@freebsd.org> <20041214181231.GA80817@scylla.towardex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:12:31PM -0500, James wrote:
J> The way we have approached this in the past is to install /32 host routes
J> for each interface addr's and respective subnet and broadcast /32 addresses
J> into the kernel RIB, destined to lo0 interface. Place your per-interface
J> filter on 'lo0' interface and packets destined to router iteslf will be
J> subject to loopback filter before making it onto upper layer protocol.

I was thinking of this idea, too. So, it works?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041215084540.GB53509>