Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:24:04 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>, <gnome@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Xscreensaver and GNOME Message-ID: <20020213161906.K65221-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20020213131147.T28238-100000@master.gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > I have no objection to a slave xscreensaver-gnome port. My only > criteria is that by default, users who don't have gnome that build > ports/x11/xscreensaver (or install the package) don't get gnome bits. As > long as you can manage that, I trust you guys to make the gnome stuff work > properly. In this case, shouldn't we exclude WANT_GNOME from xscreensaver's Makefile, and just have this in the slave port? > > BTW, one edge case occurs to me.... what will happen after you > guys are done working on this if a user who does not have gnome installs > xscreensaver, then down the road installs gnome, then down the road > pkg_delete's one thing or the other? If they install GNOME down the road, the slave port will be installed. If they pkg_delete GNOME, the salve port will go with it, and some of the shared components between slave and master (e.g. bin/xscreensaver). They would have to reinstall xscreensaver I would imagine. Joe > > Doug > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020213161906.K65221-100000>