Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      15 Oct 2013 02:49:52 -0000
From:      Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Advice sought on Portmaster -Faf and deleted ports
Message-ID:  <20131015024952.60700.qmail@irelay.ssr.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310141945160.91768@wonkity.com> (message from Warren Block on Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:51:04 -0600 (MDT))
References:  <20131013200236.7874.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310132302220.82895@wonkity.com> <20131014174833.58154.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310141426160.89896@wonkity.com> <20131014233539.56016.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310141945160.91768@wonkity.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Mon 14 Oct 2013 Warren Block wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Mon, 14 oct 2013, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Actually, the last time I updated my ports was when I installed 9.0,
> > and I used the portmaster 'nuke all ports' method I was trying to
> > day. Since then, several dozen ports of been 'deleted' or 'renamed',
> > not just the linux_base-fc4. Seems in the case of ports which have
> > been renamed or replaced, this could in fact be simply automated in
> > most cases.
> 
> I think it does handle renamed ports.  Whether the ones it does not 
> handle are due to missing functionality or because they are difficult or 
> impossible to handle, don't know.

Such was not my experience, Warren. And actually, a google search
while I was trying to solve this turned up many reports of the same
problem over the past years. 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131015024952.60700.qmail>