Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Nov 2002 23:24:29 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Robert Watson <rwatson@tislabs.com>, re@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format 
Message-ID:  <82124.1038263069@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:19:00 PST." <200211250619.gAP6J059068226@beastie.mckusick.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200211250619.gAP6J059068226@beastie.mckusick.com>, Kirk McKusick wr
ites:
>Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not
>(for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes).

Kirk, when you have a patch, mail it to me and I'll let FlexeLint
loose on it.  Currently it whines loudly and voluminously about
signed/unsigned worries in the ufs related code.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82124.1038263069>