Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:21:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (Julian Stacey) Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, phk@freefall.cdrom.com, peter@haywire.dialix.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? Message-ID: <199507092221.AAA18790@blaise.ibp.fr> In-Reply-To: <199507091955.VAA22571@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> from "Julian Stacey" at Jul 9, 95 09:55:26 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I may be off target here, but I suspect ctm rev nos have significance to an > increasing number of folk ? Yes, but it is easy put the CTM revision # out of .ctm_status or out of the last CTM patch. Rod's solution put us back on a cleaner way. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507092221.AAA18790>