From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 9 15:21:22 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA16728 for current-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 15:21:22 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA16722 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 15:21:19 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id AAA15742 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:21:16 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id AAA18790 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:21:15 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199507092221.AAA18790@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? To: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (Julian Stacey) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:21:15 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, phk@freefall.cdrom.com, peter@haywire.dialix.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507091955.VAA22571@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> from "Julian Stacey" at Jul 9, 95 09:55:26 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 396 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > I may be off target here, but I suspect ctm rev nos have significance to an > increasing number of folk ? Yes, but it is easy put the CTM revision # out of .ctm_status or out of the last CTM patch. Rod's solution put us back on a cleaner way. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995