Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:56:00 -0800
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To:        AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem
Message-ID:  <20051120135600.C47585@xorpc.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <200511201940.01686.asstec@matik.com.br>; from asstec@matik.com.br on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:40:01PM -0200
References:  <20051120101001.A45777@xorpc.icir.org> <MAEBLPAGHGPMOKCBICBNOENHCIAA.alexandre.delay@free.fr> <20051120132556.A47536@xorpc.icir.org> <200511201940.01686.asstec@matik.com.br>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:40:01PM -0200, AT Matik wrote:
> On Sunday 20 November 2005 19:25, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:16:40PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote:
> > > Interresting. I didn't find anythong about that.
> > > Where can I learn more about this "priorities"?
> >
> > well, dummynet does not du priorities but weights.
> > lookup google for "WFQ"
> > or read the ipfw manpage.
> >
> 
> ehh, I guess he wanted to know why icmp echo is beeing queued because you said 
> it before

because that's what is written in his ruleset.
(at list i suppose - he did not sent "ipfw queue show" output
but from his previous example he did not put masks on the queues).




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051120135600.C47585>