From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 20 21:56:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AC016A41F for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3878043D45 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAKLu0cv047901; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id jAKLu0jX047900; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:56:00 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: AT Matik Message-ID: <20051120135600.C47585@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20051120101001.A45777@xorpc.icir.org> <20051120132556.A47536@xorpc.icir.org> <200511201940.01686.asstec@matik.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200511201940.01686.asstec@matik.com.br>; from asstec@matik.com.br on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:40:01PM -0200 Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:56:01 -0000 On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:40:01PM -0200, AT Matik wrote: > On Sunday 20 November 2005 19:25, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:16:40PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote: > > > Interresting. I didn't find anythong about that. > > > Where can I learn more about this "priorities"? > > > > well, dummynet does not du priorities but weights. > > lookup google for "WFQ" > > or read the ipfw manpage. > > > > ehh, I guess he wanted to know why icmp echo is beeing queued because you said > it before because that's what is written in his ruleset. (at list i suppose - he did not sent "ipfw queue show" output but from his previous example he did not put masks on the queues).