From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 15 02:08:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F3416A41F for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from diodex@gmx.net) Received: from postino3.prima.com.ar (postino3.prima.com.ar [200.42.0.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D401243D46 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from diodex@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 73352 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2005 02:08:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (mbenedettini@200.122.0.212) by postino3.prima.com.ar with SMTP; 15 Sep 2005 02:08:03 -0000 Message-ID: <4328D781.2010602@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:08:01 -0300 From: Mariano Benedettini User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050425) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Anyone has a 5.4-RELEASE SMP SCHED_ULE in production ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:08:06 -0000 I have a dual Xeon running 5.3-RELEASE SMP, which I plan to upgrade to 5.4, enabling SCHED_ULE. Who's running a 5.4 SMP in a production environment, using SCHED_ULE ? Is the performance significant better ? Thanks in advance, Mariano.