From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 18:25:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DE14DF1; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89DD1D9; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BEA43BD4; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:25:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54B16EA4.2070106@marino.st> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:25:40 +0100 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antoine Brodin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r376718 - head/lang/fpc References: <201501101755.t0AHtrTf069687@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201501101755.t0AHtrTf069687@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:25:57 -0000 On 1/10/2015 18:55, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Author: antoine > Date: Sat Jan 10 17:55:52 2015 > New Revision: 376718 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/376718 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r376718/ > > Log: > Revert part of r376655 that is breaks freebsd ports > > With hat: portmgr > I'm going to go danfe here and request some clarification. This commit message does not indicate what exactly broke. Did fpmkunit not build? Is there a log? Why did portmgr have to step in versus asking the maintainer to look into it? John