Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:33:07 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: <sys/types.h> or not <sys/types.h>? [Was: cvs commit: src/include grp.h] Message-ID: <89936.1014647587@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:09:19 %2B0200." <3C7A458F.427FFF8A@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:09:19 +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Are you sure? I've just heard so many opinions about that and want to > get some clarity before backouting the backout to avoid backouting the > backouted backout later. :) > > Please, could anyone confirm or reject assertion that POSIX doesn't > require <sys/types.h> before <gpr.h>? I just checked on the OpenGroup web site, and it looks like Andrey's right -- getgr*() rely on <grp.h> only. However, the standard expects gid_t to be defined in <unistd.h>, so if you just need gid_t, and not prototypes for getgr*(), then that's the one to include. Sorry about the confusion. For what it's worth, I just asked a question. I didn't make any assertions originally. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?89936.1014647587>