From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 5 14:14:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5C42E7F96 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49GhY66rW9z43Qv for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:2af:9905:b4cf:c36d:843a:90c5] (unknown [172.58.139.215]) (Authenticated sender: galtsev) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74A3A4E620 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 09:04:24 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Does swap increase freebsd performance? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3971481588671556@myt2-8316c2cade1b.qloud-c.yandex.net> <20200505105901.4306c0f7aa0aec652e2cc65a@sohara.org> From: Valeri Galtsev Message-ID: <4d75b216-1834-2888-714a-fd18c6cf5958@kicp.uchicago.edu> Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:04:22 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49GhY66rW9z43Qv X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.135.20.70) smtp.mailfrom=galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[215.139.58.172.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[215.139.58.172.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.4]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.13)[ip: (0.37), ipnet: 128.135.0.0/16(0.18), asn: 160(0.15), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 14:14:03 -0000 On 5/5/20 8:36 AM, Ottavio Caruso via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 10:59, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> >> On Tue, 05 May 2020 15:39:16 +0600 >> Nikita Stepanov wrote: >> >> We seem to be getting a rash of bodyless messages with the question >> in the subject. Please type a body with your question even if it is a >> repeat of the subject. > > OP was doing exactly the same on the OpenBSD mailing list and got > banned there. Then he moved here. > Receiving messages with empty body is annoying (such in my psychology). People answering these messages that continue being such even after one was pointed to it several times (several days ago was the first time) remove the incentive for OP to solve his issue. As it stands, kind people just add to others' annoyance. Valeri -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++