From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 15:28:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575991BF for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABB18FC0C for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u54so4677219wey.13 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:28:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=R7t2GxJbmdM1gWTCT68GUFmb4nvMG/sEn5WdtElAdhI=; b=T93nITZzBxh3ANsYqB6nry+pZ6cbJh/cKxXrm5OJPDwzX0z2So64Jf0SQf87voFigu 1HwPNTAqtNpTOWxAZg/QQr7hybya7AZQZPl8tIeyswvBtPLdAVofJqo6+EvUphLvGixO tlEBPJwkGEHqOAsn1WBkFldxcZCW9SvV1rUewMubZYuqIR8OQ0w41xvbZxaYwQ2JUfa/ 4z4+4YSi4vDFjQIhEe5mZL/M2apezVpwYv3eJoC/k2QoIyCxERS4JKxazKKdCHgbbx4S qflohOOuhK9W+E413/uPLJ0tww9EV7tPuWkjjNYscAV+Ml8Yp2H8QE9x5Na1EnjibyAK x6NQ== Received: by 10.180.86.36 with SMTP id m4mr9032145wiz.5.1353943708376; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm24249393wiz.10.2012.11.26.07.28.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:28:27 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be Updated? From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:28:25 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org> <50B2AA07.8090103@tundraware.com> <201211251856.40381.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50B2BEE1.9030903@tundraware.com> <05eafe033134e0771d54dec2d9388c8f@homey.local> To: jb X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXzoHyxqbxIESSYhaeHdQoBi1tvh++SZ6R6t83wFesn+gok7B/IyEwUMbjI7iVtOxY7ujW Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:32 -0000 I don't get what you're trying to show here. What commands you've run indicate that: 1/ you have an up to date ports tree 2/ one of the installed ports needs to be updated So what ? Just run # portmaster libreoffice I think you might be confused, "new version available" means that you = have version 1.2.3 installed and that 1.2.4 is available *from the local = ports tree*. It does not indicate that there is a newer version of a package = available remotely and that you should update your ports tree. Hope this helps. On Nov 26, 2012, at 4:21 PM, jb wrote: > Stas Verberkt legolasweb.nl> writes: >=20 >>=20 >> jb schreef op : >>> Tim Daneliuk tundraware.com> writes: >>>=20 >>>> ... >>>>> I use portsnap fetch update and it works... >>>>=20 >>>> Ah, maybe that was the problem. That works for me as well. >>>=20 >>> Well, not quite ... >>>=20 >> I think, after the security incident, you had to obtain a fresh=20 >> snapshot of the ports tree, >> i.e. you had to do "portsnap fetch extract" before usual service=20 >> continued. >> May this be your problem? >=20 > # portsnap fetch extract > # ls -al /usr/ports/IN* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26879597 Nov 26 15:37 /usr/ports/INDEX-7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26763600 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-8 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26744834 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-9 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1654048 Nov 11 11:45 = /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2 > # portsnap fetch update > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. > Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have. > No updates needed. > Ports tree is already up to date. > # >=20 > This fixed it. >=20 > But, let's see what happens with this test: >=20 > # rm -rf /usr/ports/ > # portsnap extract > # ls -al /usr/ports/IN* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26879563 Nov 26 16:07 /usr/ports/INDEX-7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26763566 Nov 26 16:07 /usr/ports/INDEX-8 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26744800 Nov 26 16:07 /usr/ports/INDEX-9 > # portmaster -L | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: java-zoneinfo-2012.j > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: = liberation-fonts-ttf-2.00.1,1 > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: libxul-10.0.11 > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: firefox-17.0,1 > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: libreoffice-3.5.7 > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: vigra-1.9.0 > =3D=3D=3D>>> 545 total installed ports > =3D=3D=3D>>> 6 have new versions available > # portmaster -L --index | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' > /tmp/d-78227-index/INDEX-9.bz2 100% of 1615 kB 176 = kBps 00m00s > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: libreoffice-3.5.7 > =3D=3D=3D>>> 545 total installed ports > =3D=3D=3D>>> 1 has a new version available > # portmaster -L --index-only | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' > =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: libreoffice-3.5.7 > =3D=3D=3D>>> 545 total installed ports > =3D=3D=3D>>> 1 has a new version available > # ls -al /usr/ports/IN* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26879563 Nov 26 16:07 /usr/ports/INDEX-7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26763566 Nov 26 16:07 /usr/ports/INDEX-8 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26665016 Nov 26 16:12 /usr/ports/INDEX-9 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1654048 Nov 11 11:45 = /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2 > # portsnap update > Ports tree is already up to date. > # >=20 > Well, what do you say about this ? > jb >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"