From owner-freebsd-install Tue Sep 26 12:31:27 1995 Return-Path: owner-install Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA19315 for install-outgoing; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 12:31:27 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA19309 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 12:31:24 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA23378; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 12:30:59 -0700 To: richard@harlequin.co.uk (Richard Brooksby) cc: freebsd-install@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One-line status windows In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Sep 1995 12:35:44 BST." Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 12:30:59 -0700 Message-ID: <23376.812143859@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-install@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > When the installation program is reporting progress, such as newfs > commands, it prints each one in its own dialog box, erasing the previous > one, often too fast for the eye to follow. Yeah, this is due to inherent limitations in what's currently offered by the `libdialog' library (/usr/src/gnu/lib/libdialog). You can't put the popup dialogs at arbitrary x/y locations, etc. The problems have been known about for a long time, but no one seems to have the time to do anything about it. :-( A more generalized GUI paradigm has also been talked about here from time to time, but again - not a lot of code written. Everyone interested in fancy install enabling tools like this also seems to be interested in many other things as well, and there are only so many hours in the day! :) I would welcome an attempt to breath life into the installation mechanism framework from the "display library" perspective. We could also use more enabling technology that doesn't require X. Jordan