From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 00:22:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C00F37B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rage.so36.net (rage.so36.net [212.84.195.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BA443FE0 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:22:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ths@katjusha.de) Received: (qmail 12169 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 07:22:21 -0000 Received: from typhaon.so36.net (212.84.195.42) by rage.so36.net with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 07:22:21 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:22:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Thorsten Schroeder X-X-Sender: ths@typhaon.so36.net To: Don Lewis In-Reply-To: <200306160640.h5G6eWM7048102@gw.catspoiler.org> Message-ID: References: <200306160640.h5G6eWM7048102@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:22:23 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > > I don't know what it could be - perhaps a problem with named pipes > > ("lock/trigger")? > > > > You can find my ktrace output here: http://cs.so36.net/~ths/kdump.txt > Which version of fifo_vnops.c? If the problem is present in > 5.1-RELEASE, then the problem is likely to be the change made in 1.79 > and 1.85. If the problem didn't show up until after the 5.1-RELEASE, > then the problem could be the changes in 1.87 or 1.88. FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Thu Jun 5 19:29:29 CEST 2003 fifo_vnops.c: $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v 1.87 2003/06/01 06:24:32 truckman Exp $ bye, thorsten > >