From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 11 22:12:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9623699 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B0E188A for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDLZ0-0000AK-SA for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:12:22 +0100 Received: from 97.96.39.205 ([97.96.39.205]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:12:22 +0100 Received: from dpejesh by 97.96.39.205 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:12:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: David Shane Holden Subject: Re: Atom Board ACPI API MOPNV10J failing since 9.1 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:11 -0500 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <52CF850A.9060906@erdgeist.org> <201401211215.22021.jhb@freebsd.org> <52DED060.4070800@yahoo.com> <201402111319.14546.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 97.96.39.205 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 In-Reply-To: <201402111319.14546.jhb@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:12:25 -0000 On 02/11/14 13:19, John Baldwin wrote: > > The patch I have in mind is a more general version of this that > would have the same effect. > > I haven't tested it in quite a while, but if you are brave you can > test it. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/multipass.patch > When I tested your pci_bus_rman3.patch the other day I ran it on this Atom board. To my surprise the problem seemed to have been fixed somewhere along the line. I'm not sure if it was your patch, r261243, some other commit, or me just not having it configured properly to trigger the problem again. I'll try to spend some time tonight on it.