Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:03:21 +0100 (MET) From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... Message-ID: <199911252103.WAA08549@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <11244.943555121@zippy.cdrom.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <11244.943555121@zippy.cdrom.com> you write: >> -current (all the latest greatest experimental). >> -stable (all the latest gretest "Stable" stuff). >> -missioncritical (conservative release, once a year or so - only bug >> fixes after release). > >Actually, the -missioncritical branch is sort of provided for >now as a function of -previousstable. There are plenty of people still >running 2.2.x, for example, and you even still occasionally see commits >to the 2.2.x branch. Hmm 2.2.x... Have all the Y2K fixes been merged back there? Wondering... -- Juergen Lock <nox.foo@jelal.kn-bremen.de> (remove dot foo from address to reply) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911252103.WAA08549>