From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 25 14: 2:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blaubaer.kn-bremen.de (blaubaer.kn-bremen.de [195.37.179.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7754314C89 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:02:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by blaubaer.kn-bremen.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id XAA29346; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 23:00:16 +0100 Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.8.5) id WAA08549; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:03:21 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:03:21 +0100 (MET) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <199911252103.WAA08549@saturn.kn-bremen.de> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.stable In-Reply-To: <11244.943555121@zippy.cdrom.com> References: Organization: home Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <11244.943555121@zippy.cdrom.com> you write: >> -current (all the latest greatest experimental). >> -stable (all the latest gretest "Stable" stuff). >> -missioncritical (conservative release, once a year or so - only bug >> fixes after release). > >Actually, the -missioncritical branch is sort of provided for >now as a function of -previousstable. There are plenty of people still >running 2.2.x, for example, and you even still occasionally see commits >to the 2.2.x branch. Hmm 2.2.x... Have all the Y2K fixes been merged back there? Wondering... -- Juergen Lock (remove dot foo from address to reply) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message