Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:49:26 +0000 From: "rrs (Randall Stewart)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1711: Changes to the callout code to restore active semantics and also add a test-framework and test to validate thecallout code (and potentially for use by other tests). Message-ID: <27b97b9f73bfea74a7ca1020c345b736@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-vhk6ww63dvpj6egspuyt-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-vhk6ww63dvpj6egspuyt-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
rrs added a comment. Hiren: You have the wrong structure type. In the printf before panic it is giving you the lock that was spinning.. that would be in the callout_cpu structure I bet.. I mis-told you in email. So if you did print *(struct callout_cpu *)0xffffffff81364180 It should show you our CPU structure .. and I believe the lock should be un-held owner = 4 Either that or 0xffffffff81364180 does not equal &cc_cpu[0] REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1711 To: rrs, gnn, rwatson, lstewart, jhb, kostikbel, sbruno, imp, adrian, hselasky Cc: julian, hiren, jhb, kostikbel, emaste, delphij, neel, erj, freebsd-net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27b97b9f73bfea74a7ca1020c345b736>