From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Nov 30 13:25:03 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D087A3B106
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 417851F68
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tAUDP3Lc015871
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:25:03 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 204911] net/nanomsg: Update 0.8-beta (patch included)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:25:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-204911-13-npM7KEzoUT@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204911-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-204911-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:25:03 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204911

--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Bramkamp from comment #2)

That all certainly makes sense, and thank you for adding in conditional
dependency options. It may be worth considering the impact on the nanomsg
binary package in particular (and package users in general), where manual pages
are useful, and the build dependencies are not necessary.

This is one of the reasons why man pages are highly desirable by default, even
if there is an option to disable them (for those that don't like extra
dependencies).

While separate DOCS and MANPAGES option may add additional (requisite)
complexity to the port, I would argue it provides the most benefit for all
users, without removal of choice which aligns with the spirit of this change.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.