Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:17:15 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Optimal UFS parameters
Message-ID:  <20001207001715.I16205@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <58936.976176750@critter>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:12:30AM %2B0100
References:  <3A2F097F.15D592DD@freenet.co.uk> <58936.976176750@critter>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> [001207 00:12] wrote:
> In message <3A2F097F.15D592DD@freenet.co.uk>, A G F Keahan writes:
> >What parameters should I choose for a large (say, 60 or 80Gb)
> >filesystem?   I remember a while ago someone (phk?) conducted a survey,
> >but nothing seems to have come of it.  In the meantime, the capacity of
> >an average hard drive has increased tenfold, and the defaults have
> >become even less reasonable.
> >
> >What's the current consensus of opinion?
> >
> >newfs -b ????? -f ????? -c ?????
> 
> Right now I tend to use:
> 
> 	-b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159

I know you're pretty busy, but any chance of getting this into
sysinstall?  Maybe hindged on the size of the partition?

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001207001715.I16205>