Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Oct 2017 02:27:26 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r325097 - head
Message-ID:  <20171030022726.GA63037@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrd5AbdQanz47Axf2Qprs2nFcbp3ujK38uMzrCeXf7fMw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201710290825.v9T8PV3W047519@repo.freebsd.org> <CANCZdfrd5AbdQanz47Axf2Qprs2nFcbp3ujK38uMzrCeXf7fMw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:57:06AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2017 2:25 AM, "Eitan Adler" <eadler@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> New Revision: 325097
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/325097
> 
> Log:
>   Update UPDATING
> 
>   - Remove FreeBSD 4.x of building the kernel.
> 
> 
> It is not the 4.x way of building the kernel. It's a completely supported
> alte restive for those situations where buildkernel is not a good fit.

+1, it's a lot more straightforward and actually much faster for iterative
kernel builds, allows to inject things into the build process [*], etc.
I can't imagine doing any kernel hacking without the traditional config/
build way.

Would you mind putting the instruction back, perhaps after the "new order"
one, with some accompanying text a-la "mostly for developers/hackers' use"?

./danfe

[*] 20170408171501.GA96749@FreeBSD.org (-developers@, so no weblink)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171030022726.GA63037>