From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 29 15:48:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3760837B401; Thu, 29 May 2003 15:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9DC3743F93; Thu, 29 May 2003 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 8CBCC2ED411; Thu, 29 May 2003 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:48:07 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To: Martin Blapp <mbr@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20030529224807.GW59739@elvis.mu.org>
References: <200305292206.h4TM668N066735@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200305292206.h4TM668N066735@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/rpc svc_vc.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 22:48:08 -0000

* Martin Blapp <mbr@FreeBSD.org> [030529 15:06] wrote:
> mbr         2003/05/29 15:06:06 PDT
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     lib/libc/rpc         svc_vc.c 
>   Log:
>   Don't return -1 and abort if msg.msg_controllen is 0. For
>   some strange reason recvmsg() never sets errno to EAGAIN
>   on a non-blocking socket and just returns 0.

"for some strange reason?"

heh

-Alfred