From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 19 12:42:23 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA04883 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 12:42:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from DATAPLEX.NET (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA04876 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 12:42:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [199.183.109.242] by DATAPLEX.NET with SMTP (MailShare 1.0fc5); Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:41:38 -0600 X-Sender: rkw@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:41:41 -0600 To: hackers@freebsd.org From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Ports Tree Empty :-( Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I just extracted the RELENG_2_1_0 branch from the -cvs tree. The ports tree comes up totally empty. I do not think that this is appropriate. The (-stable) branch which this represents SHOULD have a full tree of ports, even if they are not as up-to-date as the (-current) branch. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net