Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:10:41 +0100 From: Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] A Handbook Section on Updating the Documentation Set Message-ID: <496109B1.6060501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1054974008.20090104185603@rulez.sk> References: <4956903C.5060405@FreeBSD.org> <874p0f9dv7.fsf@kobe.laptop> <1054974008.20090104185603@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello Giorgos, > > Sunday, January 4, 2009, 6:31:56 PM, you wrote: > >> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:29:48 +0100, Gabor PALI <pgj@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~pgj/patches/2008/12/27/updating-upgrading-documentation.patch.diff > >> Ping... Any news about this patch? Pong! > >> If there are no objections since Dec 27, it would be nice if we >> committed it to CVS. > > I think we are now waiting untill docsnap.sk.freebsd.org will be > online again after its failure due to its update (should hopefully > happen tommorrow). > Yes. However, I could commit this patch to encourage docsnap.sk.freebsd.org to be online when the patch goes HTML :) Well, I had an interesting comment on this from Colin Percival. He said that calling this technique "docsnap" might confuse people, because he has a portsnap (and now a tarsnap) service, with very different implementation. He would prefer calling it "docsync" over "docsnap". Just for your information. Thank you for the ping, sorry for the delay. I was pretty busy with another BSD-related things these days. Cheers, :g
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?496109B1.6060501>