Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:27:27 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: rlwrap-0.18 failed on i386 4] Message-ID: <20041025192727.GA63250@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <417CF8A9.9090003@vonostingroup.com> References: <20041023224654.GB4363@xor.obsecurity.org> <417CF8A9.9090003@vonostingroup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:59:21AM -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote: > I did a sweet of INDEX to check for other ports depending on=20 > devel/readline, I didnt come up with anything other than my own=20 > 'ftp/quftp' port. Is this a new port? Or maybe I just missed it. It's been there for 3 years, so no :) In general you have to do a grep -r instead of just checking INDEX, because not everything depends on a given port by default - the dependency might be hidden behind an option. In this case, it's only a dependency on 4.x systems since 5.x includes a newer version of libreadline that satisfies the dependency requirements. > which needs to be upped to libreadline.so.5, I have submited a PR to fix= =20 > this and CC'd the original port submiter (ijliao) The maintainer appears= =20 > to be ports@. Maybe I should assume maintainership for this port? Thanks= =20 > for the heads up Kris. Thanks, we can always use more maintainers :) Kris --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfVOeWry0BWjoQKURAoggAJ9A59A/VAeuvuiungcO+q1aX4bxRACgpKLl VHqSzJeQDsMzQlxQjeplavM= =vAnT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041025192727.GA63250>