From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 19:26:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E2B16A4CE; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:26:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1525143D46; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:26:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D30B51495; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:27:27 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Frank Laszlo Message-ID: <20041025192727.GA63250@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041023224654.GB4363@xor.obsecurity.org> <417CF8A9.9090003@vonostingroup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <417CF8A9.9090003@vonostingroup.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: will@freeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: rlwrap-0.18 failed on i386 4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:26:42 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:59:21AM -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote: > I did a sweet of INDEX to check for other ports depending on=20 > devel/readline, I didnt come up with anything other than my own=20 > 'ftp/quftp' port. Is this a new port? Or maybe I just missed it. It's been there for 3 years, so no :) In general you have to do a grep -r instead of just checking INDEX, because not everything depends on a given port by default - the dependency might be hidden behind an option. In this case, it's only a dependency on 4.x systems since 5.x includes a newer version of libreadline that satisfies the dependency requirements. > which needs to be upped to libreadline.so.5, I have submited a PR to fix= =20 > this and CC'd the original port submiter (ijliao) The maintainer appears= =20 > to be ports@. Maybe I should assume maintainership for this port? Thanks= =20 > for the heads up Kris. Thanks, we can always use more maintainers :) Kris --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfVOeWry0BWjoQKURAoggAJ9A59A/VAeuvuiungcO+q1aX4bxRACgpKLl VHqSzJeQDsMzQlxQjeplavM= =vAnT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--