Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:33:05 +0200 From: "Michal F. Hanula" <frankie@kyblik.pieskovisko.sk> To: Edy Lie <email@edylie.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anyone uses fsck_y_enable="YES" ? Message-ID: <20030714113305.GB60900@kyblik.pieskovisko.sk> In-Reply-To: <1058178534.809.1.camel@ps2.consoledojo.com> References: <1058178534.809.1.camel@ps2.consoledojo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 06:28:55PM +0800, Edy Lie wrote: > Do you guys use this option ? > Is it any useful ? I remember a server in a hospital across the town that had no UPS and went down about once a week due to the backup generator tests (they just turned off the power, waited ten minutes and turned it on. If the number of casualties was below a certain treshold, the generator was considered to be OK). About half the times the proxy cache fs was fscked up and had to be fscked back down manually. Since I've added fsck_y_enable, the server works. (Order fsck_y_enable now and you will get this hostname= FOR FREE.) m&f - -- What do you care what other people think? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/EpTx4PY2BaN84VwRAmEuAJ0bLgBxxBjMTpiutNt4qGRqU6tgqACfa58h 1A8dQnup0ldVAPNMJa82p68= =sief -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030714113305.GB60900>