From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 19 20:31:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457311065689 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02678FC12 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so7442871wer.13 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:31:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MtDMc9tGAsJT3EgJ9p+CC04+IUmoS1EAE3l9yU3mDJ8=; b=oX8Cl7HXqgG+FCU4YwFPZZ7gfJw2P99Jo2gdNe7+jtKC9d14waySfUMuQUnVF60sOE QobbZzIyxVM82zxlK35VK2qzH/ooqOI4lsW2qZAXNQk9i0Ztpn/8GKeqKBHKVrY5Xtxn ck4Ppk8dmY+iaD3JmNRYUNKhCavbJLesL+gYqt89NB+DoVZlhbrr9q6hRoduRZX2DKSm t2unY4AdIRYdPv93cO3bH2rHl3AJmPY9qg8PK26My5vEOw+VeYHTQ8uqC4ir3lm370ag 1dUhTjwCXoRG3erTcid/KPXvOSAJ3vTz0fzNXO0oOQMG8Xl6ZP0FLsWVkUhXA9uPCP8a GRvA== Received: by 10.180.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr8555425wib.12.1334867476751; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm291667wix.4.2012.04.19.13.31.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:31:10 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120419213110.7e748451@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pcre library linking issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:31:18 -0000 On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:28:43 -0500 (CDT) Lars Eighner wrote: > The old library should have been moved to a compatibility library so > that things that still depended on it could find it. This did not > happen for some reason. Only portupgrade does that by default. It's an option on portmaster, and unsupported by portmanager.