From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 9 18:48:52 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id SAA26923 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 18:48:52 -0800 Received: from earth.sarnoff.com (earth.sarnoff.com [130.33.8.176]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA26915 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 18:48:47 -0800 Received: from mini.sarnoff.com by earth.sarnoff.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00581; Thu, 9 Feb 95 21:48:08 EST Received: by mini.sarnoff.com (931110.SGI/930416.SGI) for @earth.sarnoff.com:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org id AA26161; Thu, 9 Feb 95 20:24:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 20:24:54 -0500 (EST) From: Ron Minnich To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: enet throughput Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk freebsd enet performance doesn't look too good down here. from freebsd -> irix i see 700 kbytes/sec. This is using 3c509s, isa bus, p90 systems, the 12/22/94 snap. from freebsd -> freebsd i see 200 kbytes/second. Linux on similar boxes, same cards, sees 980 according to a friend. Any hints to me (i don't read -questions) would be welcome. (besides "convert to linux" i mean) Ron Minnich |We can think of C++ as the Full Employment Act rminnich@earth.sarnoff.com |for Programmers. After all, with each compiler (609)-734-3120 |version change, you have to rewrite all your code.