Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:58:06 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Eugene Polovnikov <paranoid@brain-fag.org>, net@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines Message-ID: <20010316125806.J12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <20010316124046.D67000@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:40:46PM %2B0200 References: <20010316112914.A50671@zssm.zp.ua> <20010316105026.A12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010316124046.D67000@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20010316 12:45], Ruslan Ermilov (ru@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: >On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: >> -On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov (paranoid@brain-fag.org) wrote: [gif versus nos-tun] >Yes, gif(4) works the same way, and multihomed enabled (see gifconfig(8)), >with the exception that it always uses the IPPROTO_IPV4 (protocol 4) for >encapsulating of IPv4 payload. [gif preferred over nos-tun] >I fully agree. Noted. >> Translated, does gif do what nos-tun can do and more? Yes? Let's rip >> out nos-tun and support the other well maintained solution. >> >Except that it does not allow to use proto 94 (the default for nos-tun). I'm sure we can work something out with the KAME guys over this, if it is necessary to keep this in. *chalks up another task* -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai .oUo. asmodai@[wxs.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 In the dark backward and abysm of time... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010316125806.J12010>