From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 24 21:13:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DD716A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:13:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37B243D54 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:13:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j2OLDNle007735; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:13:23 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Bob Johnson In-Reply-To: <42432AC9.50702@eng.ufl.edu> References: <4241DBED.2050600@libertysurf.fr> <4240B2F7.5010805@bah.homeip.net> <126eac4805032323547e728023@mail.gmail.com> <1111654311.756.71.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <126eac48050324010546e5949@mail.gmail.com> <1111655431.756.77.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <4242DD2C.5030209@eng.ufl.edu> <1111685496.756.96.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <4242FD8F.2070801@eng.ufl.edu> <1111692868.756.130.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <42432AC9.50702@eng.ufl.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:13:23 +0000 Message-Id: <1111698803.756.145.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: mot de passe root X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:13:36 -0000 On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 16:02 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote: > As much as I would like to ban the French to their own list, > I can't think of any legitimate reason to do so other than > personal prejudice. Well, it's good to see you strike a light-hearted note. There are an impressive number of straw men in your post but the earlier correspondence speaks for itself, and makes it perfectly clear what I was arguing, so perhaps that's a good point at which to end the thread. Peter.