From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 22:41:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF6B37B401 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perrin.int.nxad.com (internal.ext.nxad.com [69.1.70.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3358C43FE9 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sean@perrin.int.nxad.com) Received: by perrin.int.nxad.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 445E32105A; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:41:15 -0700 From: Sean Chittenden To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20030424054114.GY79923@perrin.int.nxad.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Key: finger seanc@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3849 3760 1AFE 7B17 11A0 83A6 DD99 E31F BC84 B341 X-Web-Homepage: http://sean.chittenden.org/ Subject: ATA tag queuing broken... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:41:17 -0000 Alright, well it's apparently no surprise to folks that ATA tag queuing is broken at the moment. Are there any objections to me adding a few cautious words to ata(4) and tuning(7) that advise _against_ the use of ata tag queuing given that they're likely the fastest way to reboot a -STABLE box? Here's a PR that I tacked a tad bit of info into: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/42563 -sc -- Sean Chittenden