From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 9 12:53:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903A7106564A for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [91.209.218.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF828FC1D for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from dhcp250-226.yandex.ru ([87.250.250.226]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1LrtGr-0000wO-7A; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:22:17 +0400 Message-ID: <49DDE879.3080600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:22:17 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sandra Kachelmann References: <91b92520904080938g20b6351er4ce13a5a601c2aea@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <91b92520904080938g20b6351er4ce13a5a601c2aea@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:53:04 -0000 OK. I've just committed a patch. Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > Hi > > I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? > > Sandra > > > > > > Sergey Matveychuk > Date > 3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 > Subject > Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version > Message-ID > 486CA0AF.3020602@FreeBSD.org > > In reply to > Sandra Kachelmann > References to > Sandra Kachelmann > Replies > Robert Huff > Referenced by > Robert Huff, Sergey Matveychuk > > > Sandra Kachelmann wrote: >> After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command >> >> $ portversion -vl'<' >> >> does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I >> found the information useful. >> >> before: >> gnutls-2.4.0 < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) >> >> now: >> gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) > > Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now you can > use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this functionality. > > Thanks. > -- > Dixi. > Sem. -- Dixi. Sem.