From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 15 20:25:23 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA57BA73;
 Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:25:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org)
Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1788FC0C;
 Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:25:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218])
 by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBFKPLQu059634;
 Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:25:23 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org)
Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240])
 by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBFKOxNw060629;
 Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:24:59 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org)
Subject: Re: arm/174461: [patch] Fix off-by-one in arm9/arm10 cache
 maintenance routines
From: Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok5756P=iDVUze+Bo+7FBBMWz0918ypk2=0qnoJkT_7jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201212151957.qBFJvdUo044496@revolution.hippie.lan>
 <CAJ-Vmok5756P=iDVUze+Bo+7FBBMWz0918ypk2=0qnoJkT_7jg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:24:59 -0700
Message-ID: <1355603099.1198.87.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:25:23 -0000

On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:08 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Wow, cool. What family CPU is in the pandaboard and r-pi?
> 
> Would you be able to review the earlier ARM support and see if similar
> issues exist there?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> Adrian
> 
> 
> On 15 December 2012 11:57, Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Number:         174461

This *is* the earlier ARM support.  The pandaboard and r-pi are arm v7.
I have a brand new r-pi sitting right next to my keyboard here, just
arrived a couple days ago.  But I also have a to-do list that's
crazy-long right now, and much of what's on it relates to $work. :sigh: 

I had a close look at the .S files for all the flavors in sys/arm/arm,
and other than being rife with opportunities for consolidation and
cleanup, I didn't see any other problems (doesn't mean there aren't any,
of course; I have much to learn about v6 and v7 stuff).

-- Ian