From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 8 08:17:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED7E16A4E1; Sun, 8 May 2005 08:17:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lexi.siliconlandmark.com (lexi.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B932043D93; Sun, 8 May 2005 08:17:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from lexi.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j488H49f001928; Sun, 8 May 2005 04:17:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)j488H47M001925; Sun, 8 May 2005 04:17:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: lexi.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 04:17:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Wilko Bulte In-Reply-To: <20050508080204.GA21819@freebie.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20050508040528.T55534@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> References: <200505080425.24495.lofi@freebsd.org> <200505080957.19137.lofi@freebsd.org> <20050508080204.GA21819@freebie.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-SL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SL-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.544, required 6, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.06, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: andy@siliconlandmark.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-misc@freebsd.org Subject: root's shell (Was: Re: boot banner project) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 08:17:12 -0000 On Sun, 8 May 2005, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 09:57:14AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote.. >> On Sunday, 8. May 2005 09:34, Wilko Bulte wrote: >>> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:25:20AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote.. >>>> On Thursday, 5. May 2005 04:16, Charles Swiger wrote: >>>>> Data point: I've been running /bin/sh as root's shell on a bunch of >>>>> machines with zero issues since 4.0. >>>> >>>> You got lucky then, because there's some actual footshooting potential in >>>> doing that. Use toor. >>> >>> Interesting, I have been running /bin/sh since 1.0R (yes..) for root >>> and it never bit me. Where is that footshooting potential? >> >> Sorry, I just scanned the thread before replying - there's probably no >> footshooting potential in using /bin/sh for root. >> >> I was thinking about using (/usr/local/bin/)bash for root, something a lot of >> people try to do (until they notice a toe missing :). I don't like the thought of root's login shell being anywhere but on the root partition. You're absolutely correct though (Single user mode prompts for the shell to use). At this point, this thread would probably be more ontopic on the misc mailing list. Additionally, I think that everyone's time would be better invested testing 5.4-RC4, looking at PR's or driver locking. My $0.02, Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 6f43 6564 7020 656f 2e74 4220 7469 6a20 */ /* Code poet / Sysadmin * 636f 656b 2e79 5320 7379 6461 696d 2e6e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 5520 494e 2058 6c73 7565 6874 002e 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * Tormenting bytes since 1980. */