From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 10 12:20:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.uunet.ca (mail1.uunet.ca [209.167.141.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D84737BA32 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:20:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: from epsilon.lucida.qc.ca ([216.95.146.6]) by mail1.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <80079-18237>; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:19:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:19:20 -0500 From: Matt Heckaman X-Sender: matt@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca To: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: FreeBSD SMP in 3.4-stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have a production server which at this time is a single PII 400. I wish to put in this machine a pair of PII 400 to reduce the load that's on this machine. Right now it hovers around 3.00-4.00 load averages, which is just too high, it's starting to lag the machine some. My questions is, how tested and stable is the SMP in FreeBSD 3.4-stable? As this is a production machine, I cannot afford to have problems with it. For those of you with experience running SMP under 3.4-stable, I would appreciate your input. Thanks in advance. Matt -- Matt Heckaman [matt@arpa.mail.net|matt@relic.net] [Please do not send me] !Powered by FreeBSD/x86! [http://www.freebsd.org] [any SPAM (UCE) e-mail] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message