Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:39:11 -0600 From: Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> To: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> Cc: Xin LI <d@delphij.net>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: setlocale() for base system utilities Message-ID: <CAGsORuA1daTZDZSpAeACgW3W6h6QbP_sip3aLaR7B9UF3S7r2g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3vLxHWawSiWsjzpYjr2G%2BduywjFrPsPrZ28psUa3gxXeA@mail.gmail.com> References: <50EF7554.70607@delphij.net> <CAGsORuCMfWzhWOrDD_PXunKuXWLFLkt2mGaaFgXWsNJkd9wKxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGMYy3vLxHWawSiWsjzpYjr2G%2BduywjFrPsPrZ28psUa3gxXeA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> wrote: > It's inconsistency that some utilities use localized messages while some do, > too. So I don't buy that argument. If one utility support catalogs, then localized messages can be fully supported by providing catalogs for all the locales. But if enabling locale for a narrow-char-only utility, only 8-bit encodings locales are supported, not all. The inconsistency happens within the utility. -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGsORuA1daTZDZSpAeACgW3W6h6QbP_sip3aLaR7B9UF3S7r2g>