From owner-freebsd-net  Mon Oct 14  8:41:44 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B0737B401
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csmail.commserv.ucsb.edu (cspdc.commserv.ucsb.edu [128.111.251.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1D843EB2
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from steve@expertcity.com)
Received: from expertcity.com ([68.6.35.15]) by csmail.commserv.ucsb.edu
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.62)  with ESMTP id 417;
          Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:41:40 -0700
Message-ID: <3DAAE60E.3010708@expertcity.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:43:10 -0700
From: Steve Francis <steve@expertcity.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kirill Ponomarew <ponomarew@oberon.net>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: delayed ACK
References: <20021014102444.GA52491@krion>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> is it recommended to use net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 on the machines with
> heavy network traffic ?
> 
If you want to increase your network traffic for no particular reason, 
and increase load on your server, then yes.

Otherwise no.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message