Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch for security/openssh-portable Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001130911270.68848@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> In-Reply-To: <4B4DD2A3.9030000@quip.cz> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001130806170.55823@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> <20100113132953.GH12583@sepulca.yandex.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001130838240.68848@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> <20100113134720.GA17770@mx.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> <4B4DD2A3.9030000@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:03, 000.fbsd@ wrote: > Denny Lin wrote: >> >>>> Probably you want VersionAddendum option in sshd_config? >>>> >>> >>> No. >>> >>> To my understanding and my last tests VersionAddendum and is only a >>> Addendum or did not work which spurred me to patch up the Makefile in the >>> first place. >> >> I put VersionAddendum into sshd_config (with nothing trailing behind it), >> and it works as expected: >> telnet foo 22 >> Trying 192.168.0.1... >> Connected to foo >> Escape character is '^]'. >> SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.2p1 >> >> I'm using OpenSSH from base, but it should be the same with ports. > > I am not sure, but I think VersionAddendum is option available only in base > SSH, not in portable from ports. > That's correct as far as I have seen so far. Personally I think that since openssh-portable is in ports why worry about a VersionAddendum at all and just patch it with the patch I submitted. Seems like a more secure option but that's only me. -- jhell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1001130911270.68848>