Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:15:24 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r186731 - head/sys/dev/syscons/teken Message-ID: <20090105171523.GC50568@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20090104121331.GC14235@hoeg.nl> References: <200901040020.n040KIcc041121@svn.freebsd.org> <20090104120434.GF93900@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20090104121331.GC14235@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:13:31PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > IMHO, it would be much easier to try and use the new code if the > > TEKEN_XXX defines would be implemented as both sysctl and kernel > > tunables. > > Yes. Eventually we should add tunables, but first I want to get it > working correctly. Unfortunately there is a big amount of complexity > when switching to xterm. Why xterm and not vt100? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090105171523.GC50568>