From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 06:49:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE04C357 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 06:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85F81EEC for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 06:49:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=886Ld962QZpVCJC1nwKEZfNKxbZJC1ahQDXZtJP30n0=; b=MeJ+N9nA/uPlmGsNXEC6Q9Ov71UwpfTTQtCJEgKqaNogWVef6WQ0en0XZogGXzCrAEN8u32zxczDRTlJhXTcJIzoZvbToC9cbf+woUQukO+xGm/y487ANnUDm8OeAfgY6cKlAsDVR05AEtkiLYNQVgbLi4vWUiLvDorCF1Nc1sA=; Received: from [182.1.93.8] (port=59371 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XNyx0-001BpZ-If for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:49:23 -0600 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:49:17 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Problem starting ksysguard after upgrade caused by missing links Message-ID: <20140831144917.77fc16ad@X220.alogt.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 06:49:30 -0000 Hi, I am currently updating my ports and found this problem with ksysguard. Some libraries cannot be found as the links are not there. After setting them by hand, it all works as expected. Is this known or is this just on my machine? Erich PS: Partial ldd output: ==================== libknewstuff3.so.5 => not found (0) libkio.so.7 => not found (0) libkdeui.so.7 => not found (0) libkdecore.so.7 => not found (0) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 07:46:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8562AD4E; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x232.google.com (mail-qa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356181493; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id cm18so3901903qab.9 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:46:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kDwUE8cic53eScMbIhOw/uS2orsVynswURiG8j/qLKM=; b=0E/wfALf5tf78E6qKzPDvIz4YLYMZ600J6Wzn6KjItLCUKPvOvadoOV5TTXN3sxb33 bBqtiCtvJDPKujpgWzpU9eCVkhRM8hBDK+KYnDW5a/wU7MOlxo7k9V8GQJQAGaRBOU+Y tom+x3juEljHYXPwJyUoUEvVsM8WetLc4VTxQDkziaIvpq+VPKrMgdAdAxMyTJD83PDJ M+2/IPBWI031UwaCFrBsK1M6czaHGBwcytHTXfM5QIs8z5Bier0oLDa+hpXEh27Ex5Ul PXB+5AGNSpgc5VvUtpGDh6Be13neQQJZTha5OnWKhGRlYkxqNxxA9ygVOGl2ypsl1ARA wQ5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.22.19 with SMTP id 19mr31723058qgm.18.1409471165154; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:46:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140830195721.GA12450@neutralgood.org> References: <20140830195721.GA12450@neutralgood.org> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:46:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: h_u7QRLOka1ojx2jsmSQXPXG2XU Message-ID: Subject: Re: TL-WN722N support on FreeBSD. From: Adrian Chadd To: kpneal@pobox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , atar , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:46:06 -0000 On 30 August 2014 12:57, wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:16:04PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> So yeah. Almost all of the work is done in the atheros driver side of >> things. Heck, the AR9271 bits for the HAL are likely just an evenings >> worth of work for me. I just don't want to deal with the USB side of >> it. >> >> I'm not being paid to do any of the wireless stuff in FreeBSD, so it >> has to clear the "is it fun" threshold. > > Personally, I don't do wireless. Ever. > > The real issue you just brought up is that FreeBSD is a volunteer project, > and not a product. The work that gets done is either funded by someone (by > dollar, mostly by businesses) that want something specific, or out of the > kindness of someone's heart. > > If someone who cared wanted to fund FreeBSD's wireless work then would you > turn down the funding? If you were willing, what's the procedure for > someone (not me) to fund the work? I can't really take that on right now personally, but what I can suggest is that you contact the FreeBSD foundation and let them know that you'd like to see improved wireless and you're willing to donate / fund the work. -a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 07:55:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610D6ED2 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16F08156E for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.15]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7V7nVX0020075 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:49:32 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id s7V7nVsf025094; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:49:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201408310749.s7V7nVsf025094@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:49:30 -0500 To: paul@kraus-haus.org Subject: Re: gvinum raid5 vs. ZFS raidz References: <201408020621.s726LsiA024208@sdf.org> <53DCDBE8.8060704@qeng-ho.org> <201408060556.s765uKJA026937@sdf.org> <53E1FF5F.1050500@qeng-ho.org> <201408070831.s778VhJc015365@sdf.org> <201408070936.s779akMv017524@sdf.org> <201408071106.s77B6JCI005742@sdf.org> <5B99AAB4-C8CB-45A9-A6F0-1F8B08221917@kraus-haus.org> <201408220940.s7M9e6pZ008296@sdf.org> <7971D6CA-AEE3-447D-8D09-8AC0B9CC6DBE@kraus-haus.org> <201408260641.s7Q6feBc004970@sdf.org> <9588077E-1198-45AF-8C4A-606C46C6E4F8@kraus-haus.org> <201408280636.s7S6a5OZ022667@sdf.org> <25B567A0-6639-41EE-AB3E-96AFBA3F11B7@kraus-haus.org> <201408300147.s7U1leJP024616@sdf.org> <58E30C52-A12C-4D9E-95D6-5BFB7A05FE46@kraus-haus.org> In-Reply-To: <58E30C52-A12C-4D9E-95D6-5BFB7A05FE46@kraus-haus.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd@qeng-ho.org, Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:55:18 -0000 Paul Kraus wrote: > On Aug 29, 2014, at 21:47, Scott Bennett wrote: > > Paul Kraus wrote: > > >> I have been testing with a bunch of 2TB (3 HGST and 1 WD). I have been using ZFS and it has not reported *any* checksum errors. > >> > > What sort of testing? Unless the data written with errors are read back, > > how would ZFS know about any checksum errors? Does ZFS implement write-with- > > verify? Copying some humongous file and then reading it back for comparison > > (or, with ZFS, just reading them) ought to bring the checksums into play. Of > > course, a scrub should do that, too. > > I typically run a scrub on any new drive after writing a bunch of data to it, specifically to look for infant mortality :-) Looks like a good idea. Whenever I get the raidz2 set up and some sizable amount of data loaded into it, I intend to do the same. However, because the capacity of the 6-drive raidz2 will be about four times the original UFS2 capacity, I suppose I'll need to find a way to expand the dump file in other ways, so as to cover the misbehaving tracks on the individual drives. > > > I have never bought the enterprise-grade drives--though I may begin doing > > so after having read the information you've brought up here--so the difference > > in drive quality at the outset may explain why your results so far have been > > so much better than mine. > > Don?t go by what *I* say, go the manufacturer?s web sites and download and read the full specifications on the drives you are looking at. None of the sales sites (Newegg, CDW, etc.) post the full specs, yet they are all (still) available from the Seagate / Western Digital / HGST etc. web sites. Yes, I understood that from what you had already written. What I meant was that I hadn't been aware that the manufacturers were selling the drives divided into two differing grades of reliability. From now on, the issue will be a matter of my budget vs. the price differences. > > I am just starting to play with a different WD Enterprise series, so far all my testing (and use) has been with the RE series, I just got two 1TB SE series (which are also 5 year warranty and claim to be Enterprise grade, rated for 24x7 operation). I put them into service today and expect to be loading data on them tomorrow or Monday. So now I will have Seagate ES, ES.2, HGST Ultrastar (various P/N), and WD RE, SE drives in use. > Okay. Thanks again for the info. Just out of curiosity, where do you usually find those Hitachi drives? > > > >>> If so, try copying a 1.1 TB > >>> file to one of them, and then trying comparing the copy against the original. > >> > >> Hurmmm. I have not worked with individual files that large. What filesystem are you using here? > > > > At the moment, all of my file systems on hard drives are UFS2. > > I wonder if it an issue with a single file larger than 1TB ? just wondering out loud here. Well, all I can say is that it is not supposed to be. After all, file systems that were very large were the reason for going from UFS1 to UFS2. > > > > > My expectation is that I will end up contacting one or more manufacturers > > to try to replace at least two drives based on whatever ZFS detects, but I > > would be glad to be mistaken about that for now. If two are that bad, then > > I hope that ZFS can keep things running until the replacements show up here. > > I have never had to warranty a drive for uncorrectable errors, they have been a small enough percentage that I did not worry about them, and when the error rate gets big enough other things start going wrong as well. At least that has been my experience. > I would count yourself very lucky if I were you, although my previous remark regarding the difference in reliability grades still holds. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 08:33:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12D7D624 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71AE19C7 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 634083CC56; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:33:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s7V8XTJs002009; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:33:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:33:29 +0200 From: Polytropon To: kpneal@pobox.com Subject: Re: how to install wireless n.i.c. on FreeBSD 9.1 Message-Id: <20140831103329.18f5b713.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140830200831.GB12450@neutralgood.org> References: <20140823025527.bd80818d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140826022802.198cd285.freebsd@edvax.de> <3f1e44ea23fb755ae9f8e2390ab2a3d6@surewest.net> <20140830200831.GB12450@neutralgood.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:33:39 -0000 On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:08:31 -0400, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:38:16PM -0700, leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net wrote: > > topic, can or do you recommend a character mode programer's editor, that > > is, an editor that prints a line number to the left of each line? Thank > > you for any and all comments. Yours truly, Lee > > I use vi for this, and I've gone to the trouble of compiling FreeBSD's vi > AKA "nvi" on the Linux systems I'm forced to use. > > The vi/nvi option for this is "set number". This is a good suggestion, as vi (and vi-like editors) are very common among programmers. Within X, which helps me to organize my workflow consisting of the use of terminals, browser windows, debuggers, manpages, Midnight Commander and other tools, I tend to use gviim (a graphical "enclosure" for vim, "vi improved"). I didn't improve or customize it much - just added line numbers, syntax highlighting and a few other settings. So if you are in X, check out gvim to see if you like it. If you are in text mode, use the system's vi. You can enrich it with a custom configuration file, just like with gvim (which uses ~/.vimrc so it doesn't conflict with the real vi). Your suggestion of vi is hereby seconded. :-) However, for "quick and dirty" stuff (or anything that isn't actually real programming) I use mcedit via PF4 out of the Midnight Commander. This editor is very nice and powerful, but doesn't have line numbers. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 11:28:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6783C388; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A639B1AF0; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so4631773wib.16 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 04:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:references:from :in-reply-to:message-id:date:cc:to:mime-version; bh=0PzhcYESR9v4wR4uac8/0Co1P7fE6qSQhr9itiNK2dQ=; b=HKkBnPo3O5t//fdeYTtJF8uVd8iRzCZ9U4hhf8t3SSh3EvAW6fmrHOvuGrIxdKSB2V E01hGYStuHk1canziBbLDZN0Yx/o/jS0tiYO7hN9z/1qrZhLc4mGix3uyQTXhavTjtLK G8qjg4CI9lBBNfnyhB1GbQFCcxbqu1MSBz8zV8yd27VMR/waLxaM510rME58jvgtJorE s8Xmkbu1SO0vhz2FY/pDtUKg+wACsXvGHA71bV5pFD8R33HaW1QNcIamtwrquLHEscJP dcO8DBgasiWPl/mu/Gy86jSjIFDV4yDsiRhLqVjRek9FExGGLFz0X9EXALAHV5ySPwcv LYCQ== X-Received: by 10.194.122.6 with SMTP id lo6mr25146174wjb.17.1409484484805; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 04:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.2] ([62.219.134.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sh3sm14353624wic.23.2014.08.31.04.28.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 04:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: TL-WN722N support on FreeBSD. References: From: atar In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <73C363A9-5608-4A2B-B9F3-D96E8BA93050@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:40:48 +0300 To: Adrian Chadd Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10B500) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:28:07 -0000 Here's additional place where FreeBSD has lack of support: USB based printer= s. Here's a citation from the FreeBSD handbook (page no. 251): > USB interfaces, named for the Universal Serial Bus, can run at even faster= speeds than parallel or RS-232 serial interfaces. Cables are simple and che= ap. USB is superior to RS-232 Serial and to Parallel for printing, but it is= not as well supported under UNIX systems. A way to avoid this problem is to= purchase a printer that has both a USB interface and a Parallel interface, a= s many printers do. >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> The main issue is this: I really don't like the USB driver stuff in the k= ernel. >>=20 >> When I last checked, there was no clean example of a wifi or ethernet >> driver which handles all of the odd corner cases of things correctly. >> So you'd end up with things like taskqueues still running whilst the >> NIC had been pulled out, all sleeping on a wakeup that'll never come, >> or the ioctl path not really being locked the right way with the rest >> of the USB driver. >>=20 >> I started tinkering with a driver for the AR9170, but I still couldn't >> get the command handling side of things right. It's tricky because USB >> is effectively a network protocol, but all the drivers are written >> assuming register accesses are synchronous. So you end up having to >> craft some kind of command structure that handles sleeping for >> commands that it expects a response on from another USB endpoint (eg >> register reads), but not sleeping for commands that are asynchronous. >> I gave up because it became "non-fun." >>=20 >> So yeah. Almost all of the work is done in the atheros driver side of >> things. Heck, the AR9271 bits for the HAL are likely just an evenings >> worth of work for me. I just don't want to deal with the USB side of >> it. >>=20 >> I'm not being paid to do any of the wireless stuff in FreeBSD, so it >> has to clear the "is it fun" threshold. >>=20 >>=20 >> -a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 12:20:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF32D8F; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com (mail-pd0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7FAA1EEA; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z10so3925265pdj.10 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:20:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=P6rNVRDrWkPYvOi2hRH+iMv72Ryy5y8tmWqSgmlCQKQ=; b=oz829gNuwjquk1fSFusneksm02tNGZH3IQsD38ZNsveOCd4vqGfn5O1wJvRGcDLF/6 k/lvOSi1+MbU8WDZNaSnuT1Tod5ERZn7Lxh/yALRs8BGM4uR3KLfpNOMxSXky8nYSARK +PENhwRIG2Rb60S9LV3rmQY39tbwoy5JAAtpXkzzHdDvIZynWa4QVnvyE8WFrCJk46qH edb2Cz6BLr7XdlZOBPVDynfeaXb4dG0ch2IqsAqMD9VIu0p7ndYCdbvZ182zew15XW1d Yl+nd2DN/8IJB0OZYg9mF7p9EGwnQbi8H4qXhJq+YURWTOwimkRA5xDRoqxu3bLUG4cU hCiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.196.65 with SMTP id ik1mr2550719pac.154.1409487657281; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.118.132 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:20:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <73C363A9-5608-4A2B-B9F3-D96E8BA93050@gmail.com> References: <73C363A9-5608-4A2B-B9F3-D96E8BA93050@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:20:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TL-WN722N support on FreeBSD. From: Adam Vande More To: atar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Adrian Chadd , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:20:58 -0000 On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:40 PM, atar wrote: > Here's additional place where FreeBSD has lack of support: USB based > printers. > > Here's a citation from the FreeBSD handbook (page no. 251): Why don't you try citing a non-ancient version the handbook? Like here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/printing-connections.html which states exactly the opposite. And USB printing has worked quite well for a long long time on FreeBSD. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 13:27:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1E3D5 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD7321747 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-156.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s7VDQK9f015408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:26:21 -0500 Message-ID: <540323F3.3070804@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:32:35 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: mission critical problem !!!! References: <54007A94.1020801@hiwaay.net> <20140831021308.GB38393@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: <20140831021308.GB38393@neutralgood.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:27:23 -0000 On 08/30/14 21:13, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:05:24AM -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> .... I just pkg-installed nethack-nox11, then tried to run it as a >> regular user. I get the following: >> >> >> NetHack, Copyright 1985-2003 >> By Stichting Mathematisch Centrum and M. Stephenson. >> See license for details. >> No write permission to lock perm! >> >> Hit space to continue: >> >> >> Then back to the shell prompt :-( .... This obviously won't do, what's >> wrong here, more pilot error ? TIA .... > You can use ktrace to see what files and directories are being accessed > by NetHack: > > % ktrace -t cn NetHack > % kdump > > I don't know the name of the executable. You'll have to change "NetHack" > to be the correct executable name. > > Is NetHack setuid or setgid? If so you may need to unset those bits while > using ktrace to shoot down the problem. > > Personally, I swear by ktrace. It isn't as powerful/flexible as dtrace, > but the user interface just can't be beat. It's so straightforward doing > what it does that it has saved my bacon I've forgotten how many times. > Heck, one year I had to use it on MacOS X to get the commercial tax filing > software I was using actually working. I wound up searching the error msg on google & turned up a solution, the perms of one of the nethack dirs needed adjustment .... I did that & I am off to the races .... Thx :-) ..... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 13:42:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AFD178D; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465C618FD; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7VDg7T4035916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:42:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s7VDg6o7035907; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:42:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:42:06 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: atar Subject: Re: TL-WN722N support on FreeBSD. In-Reply-To: <73C363A9-5608-4A2B-B9F3-D96E8BA93050@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <73C363A9-5608-4A2B-B9F3-D96E8BA93050@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:42:07 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Adrian Chadd , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:42:14 -0000 On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, atar wrote: > Here's additional place where FreeBSD has lack of support: USB based printers. > > Here's a citation from the FreeBSD handbook (page no. 251): > >> USB interfaces, named for the Universal Serial Bus, can run at even >> faster speeds than parallel or RS-232 serial interfaces. Cables are >> simple and cheap. USB is superior to RS-232 Serial and to Parallel >> for printing, but it is not as well supported under UNIX systems. A >> way to avoid this problem is to purchase a printer that has both a >> USB interface and a Parallel interface, as many printers do. That appears to be an old version of the Handbook. The current printing chapter covers all four common connection types: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/printing-connections.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 14:15:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A9438C for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1F61BDD for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-156.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s7VEF5fB007179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:15:06 -0500 Message-ID: <54032F60.8030504@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:21:20 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: FF31 question .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:15:07 -0000 .... I commonly save web content as PDF's for later reference, have been doing this for years. I am finding that the current FireFox (v31) under FBSD 9.3 seems to be writing slightly garbled PDF's. I save them from the print dialog by choosing 'save to file', rather than 'print to lpr'. What pages I have checked (some NewEgg receipts which I both saved & printed) printed AOK, but are garbled in the saved PDF's .... Is anyone else seeing this ? FF bug ? Something else ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 14:28:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D173766E for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 821B31CD3 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-156.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s7VESK7O016664 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:28:20 -0500 Message-ID: <5403327B.6070409@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:34:35 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: FF31 question .... References: <54032F60.8030504@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54032F60.8030504@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:28:22 -0000 On 08/31/14 09:21, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > .... I commonly save web content as PDF's for later reference, have > been doing this for years. I am finding that the current FireFox (v31) > under FBSD 9.3 seems to be writing slightly garbled PDF's. I save them > from the print dialog by choosing 'save to file', rather than 'print > to lpr'. What pages I have checked (some NewEgg receipts which I both > saved & printed) printed AOK, but are garbled in the saved PDF's .... > Is anyone else seeing this ? FF bug ? Something else ? TIA .... > > .... Update: This seems to be website-specific, sorry for the noise :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 15:48:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B75668 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [192.99.32.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595511510 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8525D3B09E for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:39:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tds-solutions.net Received: from tds-solutions.net ([127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujOkSQUQ-Ktd for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:38:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (24-177-51-95.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com [24.177.51.95]) (Authenticated sender: sorressean) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B2323B09C for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:38:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:39:52 -0400 From: "Littlefield, Tyler" Reply-To: tyler@tysdomain.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: best solution for encrypting a mountpoint? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:48:31 -0000 Hello all: I would like to encrypt my /home directory. Is there a good solution for handling this? There is already a partition, so I'd like to unmount it and somehow set it up so that it will be encrypted. Thanks, -- Take care, Ty http://tds-solutions.net He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 16:12:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906F0CCA for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7E618CB for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p57BCF893.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.188.248.147]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7VG9d31059706; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:09:40 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s7VGBnnb031741; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:11:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7VGBVP9050225; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:11:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201408311611.s7VGBVP9050225@fire.js.berklix.net> To: tyler@tysdomain.com Subject: Re: best solution for encrypting a mountpoint? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:39:52 -0400." <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:11:30 +0200 Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:12:08 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: "Littlefield, Tyler" > Reply-to: tyler@tysdomain.com > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:39:52 -0400 "Littlefield, Tyler" wrote: > Hello all: > I would like to encrypt my /home directory. Is there a good solution for > handling this? There is already a partition, so I'd like to unmount it > and somehow set it up so that it will be encrypted. > Thanks, FreeBSD supports 2 encrypting file systems, I happen to use gbde, try man gbde How I use gbde to encrypt mount my /home http://berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.sh/gbde2.sh Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies Below, like a play script. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 16:14:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9330CE51 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03CA118E7 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p57BCF893.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.188.248.147]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7VGCYoM059876; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:12:34 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s7VGEiW2031746; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:14:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7VGEQwq050952; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:14:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201408311614.s7VGEQwq050952@fire.js.berklix.net> Subject: Re: best solution for encrypting a mountpoint? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:11:30 +0200." Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:14:25 +0200 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, tyler@tysdomain.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:14:56 -0000 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Hi, Reference: > > From: "Littlefield, Tyler" > > Reply-to: tyler@tysdomain.com > > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:39:52 -0400 > > "Littlefield, Tyler" wrote: > > Hello all: > > I would like to encrypt my /home directory. Is there a good solution for > > handling this? There is already a partition, so I'd like to unmount it > > and somehow set it up so that it will be encrypted. > > Thanks, > > FreeBSD supports 2 encrypting file systems, I happen to use gbde, try man gbde > > How I use gbde to encrypt mount my /home > http://berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.sh/gbde2.sh PS man geli http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies Below, like a play script. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 16:48:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3A01B0A for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA091BDA for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id lf10so10315567pab.1 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Bn/hJr4gl8YexTqERCItoZ8kX7UXe+mDA3zndVN8GJ8=; b=iIY+3uScGCBfaTYTN3DuyBfW1UKO9ofIsA5v9cXiwqj3SR0yf72N4gMU2QsFDb9M0X PRBcUa69p79vrF2xvklVWGXDN+TbmxfzPD8SCGiD5Vh0w1XlUPZMgA1PFjz0iQ6gE7wU yzjYQH33/RrWX1WQYX1/eRA/dvjpkMhRM2iEYl0Dj74fOAY0pFrgsUj/enbAoiKuSxh4 03IRnMPZpwe9t+pw40N/j/6/bv1+ixI3POPGAgdgUYCUhoI6sz3nr0giHU5cYnNSwkQa uU5FKz+UYHVsVSLQHF7Z4xH9oavD70iTg1IUrhaHSec8b0pSQafIo2P/eGD9mB5SbI++ ujHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.14.67 with SMTP id n3mr4927826pdc.132.1409503737608; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.118.132 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:48:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201408311611.s7VGBVP9050225@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> <201408311611.s7VGBVP9050225@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:48:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: best solution for encrypting a mountpoint? From: Adam Vande More To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , tyler@tysdomain.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:48:58 -0000 On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > FreeBSD supports 2 encrypting file systems, This isn't technically correct on a couple levels. First, gbde and geli encrypt block devices. FS's may live on such a block device and then be encrypted, but then again so could swap. FreeBSD also supports http://wiki.freebsd.org/PEFS through the ports system and this is actually an encrypted filesystem. Additionally I prefer geli over gbde since it supports a wider variety of feature and is perhaps more secure. See the corresponding handbook and man pages for details. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 17:12:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF7ABF26 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (mail-qc0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BDC1E36 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x3so4437244qcv.2 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:12:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=6C5F+FwjtXZ3VSgPNGiYYj9Z/ZohfPxFhBaTm0Np78c=; b=L7WSZpM0kBqxcU1MKT/Zd3ookMKlz2zvww3465VN7e6dRi9wIt670U8nLfCYnNZQ2P iBNYEFgR9yw9zF7GuOKT/IaQu5WWRWucJJD9yYM77fD15oGkUNF1kAG8AVMvffWkqE/w KSquJIHQkMRcKFldzMYkg506BmVLaEar6m5Iq30mMBaErsRESwWeGR6frZW2BWfEZObM NNN81ZqXNs4vBabgNEvb/cJtmC4eU0DCITjvXT8/I1HDcnjOi9J+IgAfJYZ7PONOlUpz 61QT4amm75EDfj1FGdX33tx9gIqX1Xrk2972bli2oqgq5zhWSA73oAB9d5IcQPyBGr5S QNSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQks57APIWVv12n5OAjpumvfSwPEomh4J2se1Np69Fklnvzq3/DfcCxHHpE4uf437gKd4eI1 X-Received: by 10.229.73.70 with SMTP id p6mr37580242qcj.13.1409505153717; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.65] ([96.236.21.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm18993045qad.31.2014.08.31.10.12.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: gvinum raid5 vs. ZFS raidz Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Paul Kraus In-Reply-To: <201408310749.s7V7nVsf025094@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:12:32 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201408020621.s726LsiA024208@sdf.org> <53DCDBE8.8060704@qeng-ho.org> <201408060556.s765uKJA026937@sdf.org> <53E1FF5F.1050500@qeng-ho.org> <201408070831.s778VhJc015365@sdf.org> <201408070936.s779akMv017524@sdf.org> <201408071106.s77B6JCI005742@sdf.org> <5B99AAB4-C8CB-45A9-A6F0-1F8B08221917@kraus-haus.org> <201408220940.s7M9e6pZ008296@sdf.org> <7971D6CA-AEE3-447D-8D09-8AC0B9CC6DBE@kraus-haus.org> <201408260641.s7Q6feBc004970@sdf.org> <9588077E-1198-45AF-8C4A-606C46C6E4F8@kraus-haus.org> <201408280636.s7S6a5OZ022667@sdf.org> <25B567A0-6639-41EE-AB3E-96AFBA3F11B7@kraus-haus.org> <201408300147.s7U1leJP024616@sdf.org> <58E30C52-A12C-4D9E-95D6-5BFB7A05FE46@kraus-haus.org> <201408310749.s7V7nVsf025094@sdf.org> To: Scott Bennett X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd@qeng-ho.org, Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:12:40 -0000 On Aug 31, 2014, at 3:49, Scott Bennett wrote: > Paul Kraus wrote: >> I typically run a scrub on any new drive after writing a bunch of = data to it, specifically to look for infant mortality :-) >=20 > Looks like a good idea. Whenever I get the raidz2 set up and some > sizable amount of data loaded into it, I intend to do the same. = However, > because the capacity of the 6-drive raidz2 will be about four times = the > original UFS2 capacity, I suppose I'll need to find a way to expand = the > dump file in other ways, so as to cover the misbehaving tracks on the > individual drives. I=92m not sure I would worry about exercising the entire range of tracks = on the platters, if a platter has a problem (heads or coating) it will = likely show up all over the platter. If the problem is specific to a = region, I would expect the drive to be able to remap the bad sectors (as = we previously discussed). >> Don?t go by what *I* say, go the manufacturer?s web sites and = download and read the full specifications on the drives you are looking = at. None of the sales sites (Newegg, CDW, etc.) post the full specs, yet = they are all (still) available from the Seagate / Western Digital / HGST = etc. web sites. >=20 > Yes, I understood that from what you had already written. What I = meant > was that I hadn't been aware that the manufacturers were selling the = drives > divided into two differing grades of reliability. =46rom now on, the = issue > will be a matter of my budget vs. the price differences. Sorry If I was being overly descriptive, I am more of a math and science = guy than an english guy, so my writing is often not the most clear. When = I started buying Enterprise instead of Desktop drives the price = difference was under $20 for a $100 drive. The biggest reason I started = buying the Enterprise drives is that they are RATED for 24x7 operation, = while Desktop are typically designed for 8x5 (but rarely do they say :-) = While I do have my desktop and laptop systems setup to spin down the = drives when not in use (and I leave some of them booted 24x7), my = server(s) run 24x7 and THAT is where I pay for the Enterprise drives. I = treat the drives in the laptop / desktop systems as disposable and do = NOT keep any important data only on them (I rsync my laptop to the = server a couple times per week and use TimeMachine when at the office). > Okay. Thanks again for the info. Just out of curiosity, where do = you > usually find those Hitachi drives? Newegg =85 Once they lean red how to ship drives without destroying them = I started buying drives from them :-) >> I wonder if it an issue with a single file larger than 1TB ? just = wondering out loud here. >=20 > Well, all I can say is that it is not supposed to be. After all, = file > systems that were very large were the reason for going from UFS1 to = UFS2. I realized that I proposed something ludicrous (the problem with = thinking =93aloud=94), if the FS did not support -files- larger than = 1TB, then the write operation would have failed when you got to that = point. Yes, I remember FSes that could not handle a -file- larger than = 2GB! Note that there is a difference between the size of a filesystem and the = size of the largest -file- that filesystem may contain. >> I have never had to warranty a drive for uncorrectable errors, they = have been a small enough percentage that I did not worry about them, and = when the error rate gets big enough other things start going wrong as = well. At least that has been my experience. >>=20 > I would count yourself very lucky if I were you, although my = previous > remark regarding the difference in reliability grades still holds. I have not tried to use Desktop drives in a Servers (either my own or a = client=92s) for well over a decade. I do not remember much about drive = failures before that. Back then my need for capacity was growing faster = than drives were failing, so I was upgrading before the drives failed. I = still have a pile of 9GB SCSI drives (and some 18GB and 36GB) kicking = around from those days. Not to mention the drawer full of 500MB (yes, = 0.5GB) drives I harvested from an old Sun SS1000 before I sold it =85 I = should have left the drives in it. -- Paul Kraus paul@kraus-haus.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 21:21:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 480E0F03 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21461BB0 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home (slackbox.xs4all.nl [83.162.243.5]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s7VLLFZm051352; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:21:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C54C6123C8; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:21:14 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: "Littlefield, Tyler" Subject: Re: best solution for encrypting a mountpoint? Message-ID: <20140831212114.GA24207@slackbox.erewhon.home> References: <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:21:25 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 11:39:52AM -0400, Littlefield, Tyler wrote: > Hello all: > I would like to encrypt my /home directory. Is there a good solution for= =20 > handling this? There is already a partition, so I'd like to unmount it=20 > and somehow set it up so that it will be encrypted. The procedure to do this is as follows, assuming you want to use geli encryption and a UFS filesystem. Note that geli encryption is currently not suited for SSDs since it lacks TRIM support. And you cannot encrypt in situ with gbde or geli. * Make a backup of your data on /home, and verify it! * Unmount /home * The following steps should be run as root. Preferably with no other users logged in (since /home is unmounted). * Fill the /home partition with pseudo-random garbage. This makes cryptanal= ysis harder but mostly ensures that no retrievable data is left. *This will destroy all data on the partition.* *Make sure you have a good backup!*. You should replace with the partition id of your /home. # dd if=3D/dev/random of=3D/dev/ bs=3D1M * Initialize the partition to use gbde or geli. I'm using geli in this example; # geli init -l 256 /dev/ # geli attach /dev/ Choose a strong passphrase. * Now create a new filesystem on the encrypted device; # newfs -U /dev/.eli # mount /dev/.eli /home * Change /etc/fstab to point to the new '.eli' device for the home partitio= n. * Finally you have to restore your data to the new /home filesystem. When the system encounters encrypted devices in /etc/fstab on startup, it w= ill prompt you for the passphrase. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUA5HKAAoJEED21dyjijPgLbkQALBZIjvEj+2ibS2xO5yhEg5f yOA3Pj2Ptr9UmXH5Da/gGIQjrCZSc27MpbgPcJjay1R9Ru8Qh5CuVBDMlh6ONdjF SigrHu7MF5+FsFEfxEsfACOR/73NA5bmwADpr6XCMId9IUiaXtwjaM9gS2T0n99F 7CsnhhJh/M2QZTci1OZQtEgHggGrbkJAdHXl+B8QQvqaf4gj+90fLZYxvSM43EXs IxiCh2MTYpgjRPMwoVUx3EY46vtIY1QJxFwMGunCavGESlFEg15SyqpGMEh4BhFA 9HdZ2sS7YRPhAO5wH76s6GCxtDVnYs8am5rWOFaWcOQE3UQcUdcVz/zsUPJZAecX 0uXRW+tsg6eI5MvA+b5CsfbJ0ZcPz0klucqmhNiTQAs6lbv2zIyUDulJjlYeM+wS wlyv8ScUEiBDUUE7seA+CPPIOA1SNwPJoKrMrdRw8ou3Wbl68fL0TWrPyfcHmUyB wm4oo9GF0Vj9cyPeH2c1STdyBCd2unfiHbArmsU1H6XznNHNi4+C6xNdCO3z9ekq 1ChCWYENIHg3GJJ78+3UYZeeOyNZHJgH5wCp+5ByhY39I4hmpHWKg6uid5W+Q61b pHWRJDYhulkg3chjrIy/jfhrC3/X81Nd4duAQLfPP07OzKoHUKevk1QX5xaZkaaO D0YaV9Cg/z0tQCGXGKYp =mgJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 00:11:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A7358A for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD841C03 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=v6+NVVQXm+IA6E5bQiXRg2ZmghMbyDs/T6eGkNT1CUs=; b=KbucBrDnxL8obEie27LfYtH+6C9uOS+eIbrWxYgWkaF4S9TOqAAOvAxCOE2cc9cSeQabVpA+GHTfQCbpXIt+YQVjL3TEDMj0DE4pKChtTv0KBfoGkU0yhzee88+3EBrlxGZwFGeuoXI1EYlq6/O/CYfSuncQziTd0mu4rtVNgCw=; Received: from [182.5.108.20] (port=18206 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XOFD3-003CkN-2d; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:11:01 -0600 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:10:52 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: "Littlefield, Tyler" Subject: Re: best solution for encrypting a mountpoint? Message-ID: <20140901081052.6b4eda64@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> References: <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:11:05 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:39:52 -0400 "Littlefield, Tyler" wrote: > Hello all: > I would like to encrypt my /home directory. Is there a good solution > for handling this? There is already a partition, so I'd like to > unmount it and somehow set it up so that it will be encrypted. > Thanks, > as others have already suggested, I also use GELI for this purpose. To increase security a bit, you can store a key on a removable media. This would mean that you need this media to be able to access the data. The passphrase alone will not help. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 12:55:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6666F3DC for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90B11839 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w7so5890763lbi.15 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 05:55:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=HaIiFcHWNC+uvNDdexmyI5Kun/Y0LcyXQh/kwAPtSAo=; b=HwlFHOccLaaliJsgQB5922NDLc+/nEqjbNzV4QRkXrvz42gIX6XZR/Vfl5jWMUtFnW TXIA4k0CBk1nte8ud79w31x41zY/0Fo9LFdEikSHvqgKFk4OTgojwDsb4qad7n2qIr58 TTFzuEnZj2qbi7q0ivdhCr0cdKTj++y1Pja/AKIZt6CtuzIgOSghStFClXN63V4LbQdU SGkMFdUZAa75vHTReIEyJU+mI/ygKWfd+NWelRv1dMfim7qdov3FPS6H6ZeYKwNZ6JKH sKuIH8nF81UBO318JVLm8wmOk5bVn9N1/Kwz/wc4FM1TV4Vd8sHgYxWtR+TB7oMVQ9nx irAw== X-Received: by 10.112.149.36 with SMTP id tx4mr7979916lbb.79.1409576126609; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 05:55:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.7.70 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 05:55:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Monah Baki Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:55:06 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: CGI scripts not working To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:55:29 -0000 Hi all, I installed on FreeBSD 9.3 apache 2.4 from ports I am trying to run the following test script located in /home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/test #!/usr/bin/perl -w print "Content-type: text/html\r\n\r\n"; print "Hello there!
\nJust testing .
\n"; for ($i=0; $i<35; $i++) { print $i."
"; } All I get is the script itself and not the output. My httpd-error.log shows no error Here is what I have in my httpd.conf ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/usr/home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/" AllowOverride None # Options None Options +ExecCGI -MultiViews +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Order allow,deny Allow from all Require all granted AddHandler cgi-script .cgi ls -la /home/ip[audit/public_html/cgi-bin drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 1 07:55 cgi-bin and -rwxr-xr-x 1 ipaudit ipaudit 165 Sep 1 08:31 test Here is what I have in my httpd-userdir.conf UserDir public_html AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch IncludesNoExec Require method GET POST OPTIONS Am I missing anything else? Thanks Monah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 13:15:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BEBBE40 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 183371AA1 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-47.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s81DFkRB016862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:15:50 -0500 Message-ID: <540472F8.8060502@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:22:00 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: more pkg questions .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:15:54 -0000 .... This A.M. I tried to update my 9.3 system: [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:57:42am] 513 % pkg version -vRL= Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:59:17am] 514 % pkg version -vIL= curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_4,2) gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.52,1) libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has 2.21.15_3) xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has 1.12.4_8,1) [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:59:39am] 515 % pkg audit linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 is vulnerable: expat2 -- Parser crash with specially formatted UTF-8 sequences CVE: CVE-2009-3720 WWW: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/5f030587-e39a-11de-881e-001aa0166822.html 1 problem(s) in the installed packages found. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:04:50am] 516 % pkg -N pkg: 468 packages installed [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:08:15am] 517 % pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:09:34am] 518 % pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:09:52am] 519 % i.e. I (think I) told pkg to upgrade whatever needed upgrading, & it did nothing, even though it seems to list a few pkg's needing upgrading .... more noob pilot-error, I'm sure, but any help appreciated :-/ .... TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 13:31:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864563BE for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9071C7E for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-47.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s81DVgo0031717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:31:42 -0500 Message-ID: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:37:57 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: oddball occurence .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:31:50 -0000 .... I have been online for the last hour or so, E-mails, a bit of browsing, etc. I noticed my DSL modem light was flashing furiously, indicating traffic. I wasn't doing anything right then, so I poked around a bit: [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:27:40am] 461 % netstat Active Internet connections Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) tcp4 0 0 jaguar.56481 fly.hiwaay.net.pop3 LAST_ACK tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.796 q6600.nfsd CLOSED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.946 opty165a.nfsd CLOSED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.609 opty165a.nfsd CLOSED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.656 cube.nfsd CLOSED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.64819 cube.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.51061 cube.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.18555 cube.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.59878 q6600.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.42428 q6600.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.55008 q6600.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.34995 q6600.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.24529 q6600.ssh ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.18288 q6600.ssh ESTABLISHED udp4 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80:9::1.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80:1::d250:99f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 jaguar.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.701 localhost.exp2 udp4 0 0 localhost.760 localhost.exp2 Active UNIX domain sockets [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:30:10am] 462 % ipfw show 00100 13986 1407718 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00400 0 0 deny ip from any to ::1 00500 0 0 deny ip from ::1 to any 00600 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16 00700 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10 00800 2 152 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 00900 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 1 01000 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 2,135,136 01100 0 0 check-state 01200 42560 2786580 allow tcp from me to any established 01300 5405049 5134760747 allow tcp from me to any setup keep-state 01400 93689 7505177 allow udp from me to any keep-state 01500 286 22736 allow icmp from me to any keep-state 01600 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from me to any keep-state 01700 0 0 allow udp from 0.0.0.0 68 to 255.255.255.255 dst-port 67 out 01800 0 0 allow udp from any 67 to me dst-port 68 in 01900 0 0 allow udp from any 67 to 255.255.255.255 dst-port 68 in 02000 0 0 allow udp from fe80::/10 to me dst-port 546 in 02100 0 0 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 8 02200 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 128,129 02300 1866 104640 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 3,4,11 02400 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 3 02500 68928 93614292 allow tcp from 192.168.0.0/16 to me 65000 8026 1595948 count ip from any to any 65100 7955 1584861 deny { tcp or udp } from any to any dst-port 111,137,138,513 in 65200 0 0 deny { tcp or udp } from 192.168.0.0/16 to me 65300 0 0 deny ip from any to 255.255.255.255 65400 0 0 deny ip from any to 224.0.0.0/24 in 65500 0 0 deny udp from any to any dst-port 520 in 65500 51 9692 deny tcp from any 80,443 to any dst-port 1024-65535 in 65500 20 1395 deny log logamount 5000 ip from any to any 65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:30:34am] 463 % service ftpd status Cannot 'status' ftpd. Set ftpd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:31:14am] 464 % service ftpd onestatus ftpd is not running. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:31:18am] 465 % service inetd status Cannot 'status' inetd. Set inetd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:31:25am] 466 % service inetd onestatus inetd is not running. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:31:30am] 467 % i.e. someone apparently FTP-ing .... *something* to or from my computer ?!?!?! I don't think this should be happening (see immediately above) .... What gives ?!?!?! whois on that address shows: [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:17:32am] 529 % whois 141.41.9.9 # # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at # http://www.arin.net/public/whoisinaccuracy/index.xhtml # # # Query terms are ambiguous. The query is assumed to be: # "n 141.41.9.9" # # Use "?" to get help. # # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=141.41.9.9?showDetails=true&showARIN=false&ext=netref2 # NetRange: 141.0.0.0 - 141.255.255.255 CIDR: 141.0.0.0/8 OriginAS: NetName: RIPE-ERX-141 NetHandle: NET-141-0-0-0-0 Parent: NetType: Early Registrations, Maintained by RIPE NCC Comment: These addresses have been further assigned to users in Comment: the RIPE NCC region. Contact information can be found in Comment: the RIPE database at http://www.ripe.net/whois RegDate: 1993-05-01 Updated: 2009-05-18 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-141-0-0-0-0 OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre OrgId: RIPE Address: P.O. Box 10096 City: Amsterdam StateProv: PostalCode: 1001EB Country: NL RegDate: Updated: 2013-07-29 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/RIPE ReferralServer: whois://whois.ripe.net:43 OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE3850-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Abuse Contact OrgAbusePhone: +31205354444 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@ripe.net OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE3850-ARIN OrgTechHandle: RNO29-ARIN OrgTechName: RIPE NCC Operations OrgTechPhone: +31 20 535 4444 OrgTechEmail: hostmaster@ripe.net OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/RNO29-ARIN # # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at # http://www.arin.net/public/whoisinaccuracy/index.xhtml # % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf % Note: this output has been filtered. % To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag. % Information related to '141.41.0.0 - 141.41.255.255' % No abuse contact registered for 141.41.0.0 - 141.41.255.255 inetnum: 141.41.0.0 - 141.41.255.255 netname: FH-WOLFENBUETTEL descr: Fachhochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbuettel descr: Wolfenbuettel country: DE admin-c: CK405-RIPE tech-c: CK405-RIPE status: LEGACY remarks: For information on "status:" attribute read https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-status-values-legacy-resources mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-PI-MNT mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-HM-PI-MNT mnt-by: DFN-LIR-MNT mnt-irt: IRT-DFN-CERT mnt-routes: DFN-MNT source: RIPE # Filtered person: Claudia Keune address: Ostfalia Hochschule fuer angewandte Wissenschaften address: Rechenzentrum address: Salzdahlumer Str. 46/48 address: 38302 Wolfenbuettel address: Germany phone: +49 5331 939 19210 fax-no: +49 5331 939 19102 nic-hdl: CK405-RIPE mnt-by: DFN-NTFY source: RIPE # Filtered % Information related to '141.41.0.0/16AS680' route: 141.41.0.0/16 descr: DFN-FH-WOLF origin: AS680 mnt-by: DFN-MNT source: RIPE # Filtered % This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.75 (DB-3) You have new mail. [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:28:36am] 530 % Any help on this matter appreciated !!!! This box is *NOT* a public server, & I thought it was pretty well locked down :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 13:54:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25109817 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2ED91E7F for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:54:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=vxjs/H3HelbsV3QKD63NtttAq79rr5VTPubVw06AOiE=; b=J9LHskVt2H57Ayk/s0ocbnhiK42CM7aq4wyZPkksU+ezB35k3VPDXTdFnkKnIdZmK/mHzWopLqa9h5RhmHy+GjWOhOWZ6qpWNWvW7JWEvDK3x257zk+2G9LUlTgDevvwqDI4YhfNY/tIhyuLKEOfxaOU+BaS3qX0p9u/VelMsU4=; Received: from [182.5.108.20] (port=27976 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XOS4D-0018r3-C5; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:54:46 -0600 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:54:39 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Monah Baki Subject: Re: CGI scripts not working Message-ID: <20140901215439.1fc94abb@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:54:53 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:55:06 -0400 Monah Baki wrote: > Hi all, > > I installed on FreeBSD 9.3 apache 2.4 from ports > > I am trying to run the following test script located in > /home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/test > > #!/usr/bin/perl -w > print "Content-type: text/html\r\n\r\n"; > print "Hello there!
\nJust testing .
\n"; > for ($i=0; $i<35; $i++) > { > print $i."
"; > } > > All I get is the script itself and not the output. My httpd-error.log > shows no error > > > > Here is what I have in my httpd.conf > > ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/usr/home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/" > > > AllowOverride None > # Options None > Options +ExecCGI -MultiViews +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > Require all granted > > > AddHandler cgi-script .cgi > > ls -la /home/ip[audit/public_html/cgi-bin > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 1 07:55 cgi-bin > > and > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 ipaudit ipaudit 165 Sep 1 08:31 test > > > > Here is what I have in my httpd-userdir.conf > > UserDir public_html > > > AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes > Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch IncludesNoExec > Require method GET POST OPTIONS > > > > > > Am I missing anything else? > maybe this line: LoadModule cgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_cgi.so Erich > > > Thanks > Monah > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 14:06:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6108FAF8 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A951F70 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id bj1so12347045pad.18 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:06:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:subject:message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=jZ35R19p4v3ynHbuIpVC6S3PGoyvDJscIoZuQPrc5KU=; b=xf2+Vmn6FsRQBlZSd4dH13lb/67utKcfDJxKRG9KcQXhUZiYvVfBiFyaMCf31SkLvC AITHaro7F6ZFwplvpC54AWOP8jiuu3844AccLq9BNEetunR1M3phLoxN/hhox63FF3Aj c3XBGasjqjv/Q0Z1zH3ItqM66Wx7iVQdNDzb9+4l9imsBjtnO8dqmcnwykohZmHipNMx pDwRUoWDfHrJhTtabhCp+7aDDzEjZ2hFOCnQy5bAad8WykAVsVML5wfG7o14V1C7cIC7 p7bdKodchLKqq2o9ZPLQCdLYXZlYz0OZl+rKs/z0lmASCa50xGTqty+7/WXkDQKvXekw zIdA== X-Received: by 10.70.94.228 with SMTP id df4mr38335866pdb.64.1409580371665; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.76] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ev5sm1387631pdb.79.2014.09.01.07.06.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:06:10 -0700 (PDT) From: aurfalien Subject: ZFS spacemap_histogram Message-Id: <5B81A930-A97F-44FF-AA8D-0EEFE1C26472@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:06:07 -0700 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:06:15 -0000 Hi, Curious of any one has used this ZFS tunable; vfs.zfs.metaslab.weight_factor_enable Wondering if its production ready and wether its use is noticeable. Thanks in advance, - aurf "Janitorial Services" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 14:07:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93EB3B8B for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxout02.bytecamp.net (mxout02.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512981F8C for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bytecamp.net (mxout02 [212.204.60.218]) by mxout02.bytecamp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECB11C1C251 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:59:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 83044 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2014 15:59:14 +0200 Received: from stella.bytecamp.net (HELO ?212.204.60.37?) (rs%bytecamp.net@212.204.60.37) by mail.bytecamp.net with CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Sep 2014 15:59:14 +0200 Message-ID: <54047BB2.30509@bytecamp.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:59:14 +0200 From: Robert Schulze Organization: bytecamp GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CGI scripts not working References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:07:24 -0000 Hello, Am 01.09.2014 14:55, schrieb Monah Baki: > Hi all, > > I installed on FreeBSD 9.3 apache 2.4 from ports > > I am trying to run the following test script located in > /home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/test test does not match "*.cgi", so your Handler doesn't get called. Rename test to test.cgi and retry. regards, Robert Schulze From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 14:29:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F353EA9 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE311283 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.137] (helo=smtp6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XOS7o-0008Gs-5Y; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:58:28 +0200 Received: from 5419839c.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.131.156] helo=ra.boosten.org) by smtp6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XOS7n-0003bd-Uk; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:58:28 +0200 Received: from ra.egypt.nl (localhost.egypt.nl [127.0.0.1]) by ra.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87A839877; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:58:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at boosten.org Received: from ra.boosten.org ([127.0.0.1]) by ra.egypt.nl (ra.egypt.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inY8ssdMJbKO; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:58:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imac-van-peter.egypt.nl (iMac-van-Peter.egypt.nl [192.168.13.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ra.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A13239873; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:58:26 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: CGI scripts not working From: Peter Boosten In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:58:24 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Monah Baki X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.8 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_RW=0.077, TW_WX=0.077 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:29:26 -0000 Op 1 sep. 2014, om 14:55 heeft Monah Baki het = volgende geschreven: > Hi all, >=20 > I installed on FreeBSD 9.3 apache 2.4 from ports >=20 > I am trying to run the following test script located in > /home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/test >=20 >=20 >=20 > AddHandler cgi-script .cgi >=20 >=20 >=20 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 ipaudit ipaudit 165 Sep 1 08:31 test >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Am I missing anything else? >=20 >=20 >=20 The file extension maybe? Try naming the script test.cgi (as you = instruct your AddHandler)=20 Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 15:32:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93E336A for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 447A21AC3 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b17so6302649lan.13 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=INeI/rky9itO2zf2vG3gPywhw7cBdRTTSYt3tZtSS6k=; b=AHPmayQyc2bbQBrSlecCv5iU4sZRIu0N6gKVIuBTWSeVMbYe6RoEc3jeu3ZFOKn8rV fxx5ka+YYvRVOv7H1lv/3Qe2+DRk4BPqMA/aYEmtJMkVg2wq9k0cZzjOSgS9NmUPL33H Fg+CoeNfblnNLcKeS5Hu7lUjGyhQCX5j5uGt0E3rFn9TT14ALJA9SCBU6H3eKsPnbN8j WPrc5TfVExsQXmvGdwG+gMnr4vIK1iJItcUahAVZn4zLCU4BSMopKfvvjbqy25C8f3+q QquS99kO9d10L2Ehx18HM1Iw3MvdJikOCeACBoV6lXQJlyoEfN2ocy5mKAAvJUF+Xz64 p09A== X-Received: by 10.112.149.36 with SMTP id tx4mr8776333lbb.79.1409585540020; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.7.70 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:31:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54047BB2.30509@bytecamp.net> References: <54047BB2.30509@bytecamp.net> From: Monah Baki Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:31:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CGI scripts not working To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:32:22 -0000 Thanks all, renaming the file test to test.cgi works. Now I have other cgi files without the .cgi extension, how can I keep them as is without changing the file name and have apache read them correctly. I did enable the following: LoadModule cgi_module libexec/apache24/mod_cgi.so LoadModule cgid_module libexec/apache24/mod_cgid.so Thank you On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Robert Schulze wrote: > Hello, > > Am 01.09.2014 14:55, schrieb Monah Baki: > >> Hi all, >> >> I installed on FreeBSD 9.3 apache 2.4 from ports >> >> I am trying to run the following test script located in >> /home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/test > > > test does not match "*.cgi", so your Handler doesn't get called. > Rename test to test.cgi and retry. > > regards, > Robert Schulze > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 15:54:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92959DA2 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61D251CFE for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id rl12so6313473iec.15 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:54:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6mxjXUATZU+5Surjl9JjThvMul5/JckJilA6HbfENgc=; b=Wclk6uFC/Xyn2nEsOGktf2SpsiiA14c9aqGfN7R6XCCEzj9/M4Pwad4HjHgoZ9kTu1 QF10r+lX98LFNQLTNkBDiZA0QNMjL8xd/zvI9NlpM2lpR8m71UVhZyTU1Tk5a1zcCMiX qsiEoYtkUzZqm+5y5b+SQ/ig8IXpbnjVw7bEe/peOF/tr9HVGOWxKkWLj+mtih1/tlPC ppGqQ1/ty2/jihku6a/WHP2xJWtDHbpyTjjJHpUBtTt7mbjcMfGbAU3j/fhIyyf7cifW bHcHl6nwF3fUMUYASPJA55oRgKqufz6RQPkdXSLjCeTLADk6nsZpFJX4f+zoZHqNIVM/ TSpg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.84.76 with SMTP id k12mr10715784icl.18.1409586885746; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdavidlists@gmail.com Received: by 10.43.43.136 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:54:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:54:45 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _jjU7Yu8_KBZR76SdwfjQGT_vMI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Strange and sudden delay From: J David To: Oriental Sensation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:54:46 -0000 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Oriental Sensation wrote: > http://pastebin.com/Q3W3dhLM > (again, I inserted spaces around line #151 where 5 seconds in delay -- twice). This one looks like a DNS resolution issue. It sent a packet to 10.0.0.1:53 and got no response for 5 seconds, sent another one, still got no response, sent it a third time, and finally got a response. Check the name server running on 10.0.0.1 for problems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 17:31:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F45B2 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD9D187A for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s18so6361264lam.20 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbcatgirls.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cddssjVlvXEnuvaV14LdDerlBKiZd0EWhR+Rd1oo51g=; b=CN8oHGntFJXb2D670mJACy/0Y7UimzI7G3lmKpi/daeIGVj0KSaIxW8h1uJNH9rPWW Gp22ebO2L1uTUqpla/HwRTy8L86C5dmVgxvP5NUu7IpVKJv1mhSpctOrKwl8153jZufu rEVRfsCqrwXblTiDNUByVV2Y14IDOiYG8C2t8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cddssjVlvXEnuvaV14LdDerlBKiZd0EWhR+Rd1oo51g=; b=YVTxv1odZIM0Gi4b4xAw76Zm31hPT3qo+J8yDfnPDGQx4IrYgkNLDDEw6NNKWFwTM4 zYBhlsM2fZTinvSUBMNNocSdHkunzRjOypu/OY1iJXmPMiTUhs3zQrnwg7bpb7evyoL2 M+Iv+KQG05v5qkExuBCHY69icaBydrSXNA7pRCQ0UUZhSZsTX4Rn157n2DrhmPdOvcAq m6zMsqVDBjfDBYRPwJaUy+5CxaihGaFzOnKwRWKiyK3fDpsyQ1YNTBZ+0o0RG0xTkRLH RSH7yTdV2TxtxBwwTNJMHuHL6yK7cRi5I7CUzvDKqj2A/mZy/VaRvxn5+/Uk3PIDeEGm aWyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFK/DzW2szQqA1Q1eITdPTwQWDLEWNJ54zwOgCyHF22i507tSR2muE95Owul17npF/NaVq MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.246.37 with SMTP id xt5mr10201765lac.71.1409592712287; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.216.133 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [75.120.147.91] Received: by 10.114.216.133 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:31:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CGI scripts not working From: Robert Teel To: Monah Baki Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:31:55 -0000 > > Here is what I have in my httpd.conf > > ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/usr/home/ipaudit/public_html/cgi-bin/" > > > AllowOverride None > # Options None > Options +ExecCGI -MultiViews +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > Require all granted > > > AddHandler cgi-script .cgi > > ls -la /home/ip[audit/public_html/cgi-bin > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 1 07:55 cgi-bin Check your ScriptAlias and Directory block. Most of the paths show using /home but those directives are using /usr/home. Assuming /home is a separate partition remove /usr from them and it should work correctly. If /home is a symlink to /usr/home change the ones using just /home to /usr/home to fix it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 17:44:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB36678 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313B5198D for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2CB827665; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s81HiVdC002395; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:44:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:44:31 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: oddball occurence .... Message-Id: <20140901194431.f2a33b87.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> References: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:44:41 -0000 On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:37:57 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > i.e. someone apparently FTP-ing .... *something* to or from my computer > ?!?!?! I don't think this should be happening (see immediately above) > .... What gives ?!?!?! >From your output: tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED Those are strange port numbers. Are you downloading something from them? But then... ESTABLISHED doesn't mean CONNECTED... What does "sockstat -l" say? But there are also SSH sessions which could be scp? But that would imply that authorized users are using it, because you probably don't run publish SSH without password on your system. :-) Regarding the address: > inetnum: 141.41.0.0 - 141.41.255.255 > netname: FH-WOLFENBUETTEL > descr: Fachhochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbuettel That's probably NTP. The FH Braunschweig is probably in relation (IP-wise) with the PTB which is providing a "nuclear time" input for NTP. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physikalisch-Technische_Bundesanstalt You're running ntpd? The IP 41.41.9.9 is from the FH Braunschweig range, but I can't say what particular computer. One in a lab, compromized? It's doing TCP connections. > Any help on this matter appreciated !!!! This box is *NOT* a public > server, & I thought it was pretty well locked down :-/ .... First thing: Run nmap on your public IP, just to check that your firewall rules are correct. A nice concept is "close all ports, only open those you need", and FTP probably is one you don't intend to need. If you see open FTP ports, adjust your firewall rules. Examining for strange scp connections, you can always use tcpdump on your public interface to see what's going in and out your machine. Wireshark (ex Ethereal) is also a nice tool for that task. Sidenote in relation to your signature: > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. See: "If programming languages were weapons": http://bjorn.tipling.com/if-programming-languages-were-weapons You're obviously refering to C. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 18:26:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC41206 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461521EEA for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-108.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s81IQmA0011994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:26:49 -0500 Message-ID: <5404BBDF.90804@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:33:03 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: oddball occurence .... References: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> <20140901194431.f2a33b87.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140901194431.f2a33b87.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:26:51 -0000 On 09/01/14 12:44, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:37:57 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> i.e. someone apparently FTP-ing .... *something* to or from my computer >> ?!?!?! I don't think this should be happening (see immediately above) >> .... What gives ?!?!?! > >From your output: > > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED > > Those are strange port numbers. Are you downloading something > from them? But then... ESTABLISHED doesn't mean CONNECTED... > > What does "sockstat -l" say? Too late for that ? > > But there are also SSH sessions which could be scp? But that > would imply that authorized users are using it, because you > probably don't run publish SSH without password on your > system. :-) I run ssh internally & to my ISP using keys, no passwords, I thought that was more secure :-/ .... I am not supposed to be allowing connections from outside my LAN to any of my boxen .... > > Regarding the address: > >> inetnum: 141.41.0.0 - 141.41.255.255 >> netname: FH-WOLFENBUETTEL >> descr: Fachhochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbuettel > That's probably NTP. The FH Braunschweig is probably in > relation (IP-wise) with the PTB which is providing a > "nuclear time" input for NTP. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physikalisch-Technische_Bundesanstalt > > You're running ntpd? Yeah, but w/ local server & peers only .... > > The IP 41.41.9.9 is from the FH Braunschweig range, but I > can't say what particular computer. One in a lab, compromized? > It's doing TCP connections. > > > >> Any help on this matter appreciated !!!! This box is *NOT* a public >> server, & I thought it was pretty well locked down :-/ .... > First thing: Run nmap on your public IP, just to check that > your firewall rules are correct. A nice concept is "close > all ports, only open those you need", and FTP probably is > one you don't intend to need. If you see open FTP ports, > adjust your firewall rules. Examining for strange scp > connections, you can always use tcpdump on your public > interface to see what's going in and out your machine. > Wireshark (ex Ethereal) is also a nice tool for that task. Tried from shell account @ my ISP, it said nmap not found, maybe need root to run, but that was a nogo .... tried from inside, this box & 1 other, I get the following: from other machine, FC14 server: [root@Q6600:/etc, Mon Sep 01, 01:23 PM] 1012 # nmap -A -T4 192.168.0.27 Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-09-01 13:24 CDT Nmap scan report for JAGUAR (192.168.0.27) Host is up (0.00018s latency). Not shown: 995 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 6.6.1_hpn13v11 (FreeBSD 20140420; protocol 2.0) | ssh-hostkey: 1024 d0:27:41:28:d8:4e:28:85:27:04:d5:e2:f7:39:66:07 (DSA) |_2048 3d:f7:0c:09:a6:03:24:c4:e7:b5:85:d4:59:d7:cc:24 (RSA) 111/tcp open rpcbind | rpcinfo: | 100000 2,3,4 111/udp rpcbind | 100005 1,3 849/udp mountd | 300019 1 928/udp amd | 100003 2,3 2049/udp nfs | 100000 2,3,4 111/tcp rpcbind | 100005 1,3 849/tcp mountd | 300019 1 907/tcp amd | 100003 2,3 2049/tcp nfs |_100000 2,3,4 111/7 rpcbind 515/tcp open printer BSD lpd (Unauthorized host) 2049/tcp open rpcbind 6000/tcp open X11 (access denied) MAC Address: D0:50:99:13:E3:85 (Unknown) Device type: general purpose|storage-misc|specialized Running (JUST GUESSING) : FreeBSD 7.X|8.X|5.X|6.X|5.x (99%), VMware ESX Server 3.X|4.X (91%) Aggressive OS guesses: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4 - 7.0 (99%), FreeNAS 0.7 (FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE) (96%), FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p1 - 8.0-CURRENT (95%), FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (95%), FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE (95%), FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 - 8.0-RC2 (95%), FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p2 - 7.1-PRERELEASE (95%), FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (95%), FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 (custom compiled) (94%), FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT (94%) No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal). Network Distance: 1 hop Service Info: Host: kabini1; OSs: FreeBSD, Unix HOP RTT ADDRESS 1 0.18 ms JAGUAR (192.168.0.27) OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ . Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 15.70 seconds [root@Q6600:/etc, Mon Sep 01, 01:24 PM] 1013 # running it on myself: [root@kabini1, /etc, 1:21:48pm] 527 % nmap -A -T4 192.168.0.27 Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-09-01 13:21 CDT Warning: 192.168.0.27 giving up on port because retransmission cap hit (6). Nmap scan report for jaguar (192.168.0.27) Host is up (0.000084s latency). Not shown: 995 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 6.6.1_hpn13v11 (FreeBSD 20140420; protocol 2.0) | ssh-hostkey: | 1024 d0:27:41:28:d8:4e:28:85:27:04:d5:e2:f7:39:66:07 (DSA) | 2048 3d:f7:0c:09:a6:03:24:c4:e7:b5:85:d4:59:d7:cc:24 (RSA) |_ 256 8b:24:39:58:3e:85:79:d3:c9:47:da:85:c4:7b:33:50 (ECDSA) 111/tcp open rpcbind 2-4 (RPC #100000) | rpcinfo: | program version port/proto service | 100000 2,3,4 111/7 rpcbind | 100000 2,3,4 111/tcp rpcbind | 100000 2,3,4 111/udp rpcbind | 100003 2,3 2049/tcp nfs | 100003 2,3 2049/udp nfs | 100005 1,3 849/tcp mountd | 100005 1,3 849/udp mountd | 300019 1 907/tcp amd |_ 300019 1 928/udp amd 515/tcp open printer BSD lpd (Unauthorized host) 2049/tcp open nfs 2-3 (RPC #100003) | rpcinfo: | program version port/proto service | 100000 2,3,4 111/7 rpcbind | 100000 2,3,4 111/tcp rpcbind | 100000 2,3,4 111/udp rpcbind | 100003 2,3 2049/tcp nfs | 100003 2,3 2049/udp nfs | 100005 1,3 849/tcp mountd | 100005 1,3 849/udp mountd | 300019 1 907/tcp amd |_ 300019 1 928/udp amd 6000/tcp open X11 (access denied) Device type: general purpose Running: FreeBSD 8.X|9.X OS CPE: cpe:/o:freebsd:freebsd:8 cpe:/o:freebsd:freebsd:9 OS details: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 - 9.1-RELEASE Network Distance: 0 hops Service Info: Host: kabini1; OSs: FreeBSD, Unix; CPE: cpe:/o:freebsd:freebsd OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ . Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 88.49 seconds [root@kabini1, /etc, 1:23:21pm] 528 % > > > > Sidenote in relation to your signature: >> "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war >> ever devised by man." >> -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > See: "If programming languages were weapons": > > http://bjorn.tipling.com/if-programming-languages-were-weapons > > You're obviously refering to C. ;-) > > -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 18:27:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 448843CD for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90F61EFD for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-108.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s81IReQa012431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:27:41 -0500 Message-ID: <5404BC13.2000409@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:33:55 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: oddball occurence .... References: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> <20140901194431.f2a33b87.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140901194431.f2a33b87.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:27:42 -0000 On 09/01/14 12:44, Polytropon wrote: > Sidenote in relation to your signature: >> "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war >> ever devised by man." >> -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > See: "If programming languages were weapons": > > http://bjorn.tipling.com/if-programming-languages-were-weapons > > You're obviously refering to C. ;-) > > Word dat on the 'C' ;-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 19:16:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C4BC12 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fep21.mx.upcmail.net (fep21.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F346D154F for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge04.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep21-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.13 201-2260-151-135-20130320) with ESMTP id <20140901191641.RQZB25642.viefep21-int.chello.at@edge04.upcmail.net>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:16:41 +0200 Received: from matrix020.matrix.net ([84.114.216.48]) by edge04.upcmail.net with edge id lvGg1o02813DwWC03vGg9w; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:16:41 +0200 X-SourceIP: 84.114.216.48 From: 4711@chello.at To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddball occurence .... Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:16:40 +0200 Message-ID: <2474524.BSIK5QZ5L1@matrix020.matrix.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-STABLE; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> References: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:16:44 -0000 On Monday 01 September 2014 08:37:57 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > .... I have been online for the last hour or so, E-mails, a bit of > browsing, etc. I noticed my DSL modem light was flashing furiously, > indicating traffic. I wasn't doing anything right then, so I poked > around a bit: > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:27:40am] 461 % netstat > Active Internet connections > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.56481 fly.hiwaay.net.pop3 LAST_ACK > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED [snip] ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de (141.41.9.9) is listed as mastersite for mysql- and some mozilla.org-ports. Maybe your machine just downloaded some distfiles for port building. % cat /usr/ports/Mk/*.sites.* | grep wolfen ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/www/mozilla/%SUBDIR%/ \ ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/database/mysql/Downloads/%SUBDIR%/ \ Cheers ch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 19:18:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5DFCAE for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B02157C for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E1A3CC7F; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:18:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s81JI6rB002776; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:18:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:18:06 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: oddball occurence .... Message-Id: <20140901211806.7935e5d5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5404BBDF.90804@hiwaay.net> References: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> <20140901194431.f2a33b87.freebsd@edvax.de> <5404BBDF.90804@hiwaay.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:18:15 -0000 On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:33:03 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > On 09/01/14 12:44, Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:37:57 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> i.e. someone apparently FTP-ing .... *something* to or from my computer > >> ?!?!?! I don't think this should be happening (see immediately above) > >> .... What gives ?!?!?! > > >From your output: > > > > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED > > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED > > > > Those are strange port numbers. Are you downloading something > > from them? But then... ESTABLISHED doesn't mean CONNECTED... > > > > What does "sockstat -l" say? > > Too late for that ? That's a strange program message. :-) > > But there are also SSH sessions which could be scp? But that > > would imply that authorized users are using it, because you > > probably don't run publish SSH without password on your > > system. :-) > > > I run ssh internally & to my ISP using keys, no passwords, I thought > that was more secure :-/ .... I am not supposed to be allowing > connections from outside my LAN to any of my boxen .... Okay, so the SSH sessions are to be expected and authorized. > > Regarding the address: > > > >> inetnum: 141.41.0.0 - 141.41.255.255 > >> netname: FH-WOLFENBUETTEL > >> descr: Fachhochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbuettel > > That's probably NTP. The FH Braunschweig is probably in > > relation (IP-wise) with the PTB which is providing a > > "nuclear time" input for NTP. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physikalisch-Technische_Bundesanstalt > > > > You're running ntpd? > > > Yeah, but w/ local server & peers only .... The ntpd and ntpdate need a source to sync, maybe the PTB is involved here? Depending on if you have "sync on start" or "continuous monitoring", connections may appear once or from time to time. > Tried from shell account @ my ISP, it said nmap not found, maybe need > root to run, but that was a nogo .... Maybe not installed? The nmap tool is an additional program, and running it does not require being root, only some tests that nmap can do need to be performed as root, but a normal TCP scan should not require it. > tried from inside, this box & 1 other, I get the following: > > from other machine, FC14 server: > > > [root@Q6600:/etc, Mon Sep 01, 01:23 PM] 1012 # nmap -A -T4 192.168.0.27 > > Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-09-01 13:24 CDT > Nmap scan report for JAGUAR (192.168.0.27) > Host is up (0.00018s latency). > Not shown: 995 closed ports > PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION > 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 6.6.1_hpn13v11 (FreeBSD 20140420; > protocol 2.0) Intended. > 111/tcp open rpcbind > 2049/tcp open rpcbind That's for NFS. > 515/tcp open printer BSD lpd (Unauthorized host) > 6000/tcp open X11 (access denied) I don't see FTP open here. This just means you cannot FTP _into_ the machine, but you can FTP _out of_ the machine. Maybe some download that caught your attention? Or a web browser's FTP connection (ftp://...) to, for example, the FreeBSD FTP server? For example, when downloading from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/10.0-RELEASE with a web browser, I see: # netstat -a | grep ftp tcp4 0 0 r56.46684 ftp.beastie.tdk..58441 ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 r56.40750 ftp.beastie.tdk..ftp ESTABLISHED Ha, I think we have it now - this output looks similar to yours. Compare: tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED It seems that you've downloaded something from that machine. This machine _is_ running a FTP server. For example, it seems to host openoffice.org data, as well as Linux stuff. Your nmap output suggests that _you_ are not running a FTP server. Chasing ghosts... ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 20:09:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC11D69 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rc2.surewest.net (rc2.surewest.net [66.60.130.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F9E1BD7 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.surewest.net ([66.60.130.145]) by rc2.surewest.net ({af05c03d-e86d-4922-90cb-b2bd72ac7e37}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20140901200603021; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0000 X-RC-FROM: Received: from webmail.mycci.net (webmail.mycci.net [66.60.130.47]) by smtp3.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9A289759; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:05:59 -0700 From: leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net To: Polytropon Subject: Re: how to install wireless n.i.c. on FreeBSD 9.1 In-Reply-To: <20140831103329.18f5b713.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20140823025527.bd80818d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140826022802.198cd285.freebsd@edvax.de> <3f1e44ea23fb755ae9f8e2390ab2a3d6@surewest.net> <20140830200831.GB12450@neutralgood.org> <20140831103329.18f5b713.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: X-Sender: leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net User-Agent: Consolidated Webmail/0.9.5 X-MAG-OUTBOUND: surewest.redcondor.net@66.60.130.145/32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kpneal@pobox.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:09:52 -0000 Dear Kpneal and Polytropon, Thank you both for your recommendations. Yours truly, Lee On 08/31/2014 01:33 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:08:31 -0400, kpneal@pobox.comwrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:38:16PM -0700, leeoliveshackelford@surewest.netwrote: topic, can or do you recommend a character mode programer's editor, that is, an editor that prints a line number to the left of each line? Thank you for any and all comments. Yours truly, Lee I use vi for this, and I've gone to the trouble of compiling FreeBSD's vi AKA "nvi" on the Linux systems I'm forced to use. The vi/nvi option for this is "set number". This is a good suggestion, as vi (and vi-like editors) are very common among programmers. Within X, which helps me to organize my workflow consisting of the use of terminals, browser windows, debuggers, manpages, Midnight Commander and other tools, I tend to use gviim (a graphical "enclosure" for vim, "vi improved"). I didn't improve or customize it much - just added line numbers, syntax highlighting and a few other settings. So if you are in X, check out gvim to see if you like it. If you are in text mode, use the system's vi. You can enrich it with a custom configuration file, just like with gvim (which uses ~/.vimrc so it doesn't conflict with the real vi). Your suggestion of vi is hereby seconded. :-) However, for "quick and dirty" stuff (or anything that isn't actually real programming) I use mcedit via PF4 out of the Midnight Commander. This editor is very nice and powerful, but doesn't have line numbers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 20:41:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4D9D743 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C4A1F11 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C2AAC8C1090D; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:41:47 -0700 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: controlled environment for regular expressions? Message-ID: <20140901204147.GA53086@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:41:48 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I am having a major problem with regular expression matching returning different results when run from a script under cron or as a delivery instruction from postfix rather than from the command line. I don't even know how to debug this. These are all in scripts and delivery instructions that I have had working for over a decade. And when I run them from the command line, they work as expected. The path for seeking executables should not be at issue. I use the PATH variable in my crontabs and set it to the same PATH as at a terminal. I have encountered this problem with both grep and GNU sed (gsed, from the port). This is all stuff that worked until recently, and worked for years under Linux. The only change I think I've made is to implement an IPv6 tunnel. I hope, really hope, I can safely say that's irrelevant. I use zsh, also a choice that's over a decade old, for both my command line and to run scripts. I've never liked regular expressions. I think they are an awful kludge. But unfortunately, a major part of my workflow depends on them working correctly and *predictably*. Has anyone else encountered problems with this? How do you fix it? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUBNoLAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr7lAQAIq+MsJvOz/uzjE7umOw8JTZ inPiXGr8xLhvYBtpmVI8Wh376p+HOVQANF7wGgPtxaebTWhch8Jad9PKc8oR4QQR G4XKbSomkhim1Mxpu9kggFprHmOEpIlfvCx47COc63DfbzfhKn/73mkASZJXAksY Lf06ic+2xTsxYkJcCg5OwW3b6TDVgjBD16olZuBUvbHvHgJpd2+inqjF8yWbvWbf EcdqkfbQYAyJUkf0VEQxVaAcvXcZLFmKvyqM4z+i3PFzpfgw6MFKokOZ90Zily+/ qGdWeMOX3Cehe86abKVRuIPXjP+Vd5iIGj3GtI8WVj2lfpKQggkeK88Rc83f0djI l88CilGJYePl9ylgW+45MC6PNzxCJWcoetnd95A7P22Ec/sFwSl8L9ngHQAOjWM5 crT/UY22h4iFnWpgCWsVH9L2c0/S3WJCyrzY15lTAat9hqu+sQNa5XK29JEl4GG2 aPAqVkA+M9E5yXiTdtirvHmwNCpxp2Z7W5hIP/rGXV7xwQnGiZpm5XYLnJ9asojA LCSDamU8GMJG0y7HneJZ33X1OqPkdLuJbSu9nQ4Eqm7TlkUABUCccBQnuoR5ORfr na90fWmkkw+s48iun/L1GwIR0yxHFK0w+OkKi6Ae084eGaGDf4te8AaxauFRD96E dl+e0hmWGLfDbrgHPvD0 =Jibc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:15:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CAD131; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AB8112B6; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:15:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <5404E1D2.1020201@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:14:58 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:15:12 -0000 Sorry for the cross-post but this is a bit out of the ordinary for me. In short, no matter how I try varoius changes, I am unable to run www/horde-base under latest 10-STABLE. The error is: HORDE: Could not pack data. [pid 80949 on line 154 of "/usr/local/share/pear/Horde/Pack.php"] >From what I gather, Pack.php deals with compressing data before cache, maybe also before sending to browser. Problem occurs both through Apache and with php cli. Facts: The same config ran on 10-STABLE mid-August Stopped working after updating to latest 10-STABLE end last week (27th.) Same config runs fine on 9-STABLE. Today I did a fresh 9-STABLE, got Horde up and running fine. Updated the system to 10-STABLE. rebuilt all ports and the error is back. Please, if anyone has ANY idea what is going on? If I was fluent in PHP I assume I could figure out myself... Thank you! //per From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:32:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE8EE7C7 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652C214B4 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x48so6072275wes.12 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:32:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mLzVo8tHpTUjkMBwpf8i2bvxJCz8pIj0IodGIBAzj4Q=; b=zFNn4VarRnPttmL7BWA/ciaotoafyiP+CTT9KQm+PL0ZrobmxMHK+LdAKSTslj7BZz lrHkpsta8ZFQz8I+CvEAJkHcHRHo72sLKAQJHBUpzhZkIIA7HwY4ts1zm4Vnupow11i0 gu6DGquDTLUR2MxifyG9CRZhTYTMffjVxVO18rNm4Eqz28os2TK7vvRat9XEVGPJFHPL xQ5aQBNGqQ7yrEv6utfmtXj0RQDQSX9Wx1C4sdv6achWZW42mWYU678LUPF2mUs9TLo0 +rLUTOax16m1tVGMwslwQmtHIl9VoBxOh+efSH3gFnWCvFU5P1gvlGsJt/5YK+fXeEDe KW0Q== X-Received: by 10.194.81.230 with SMTP id d6mr35116006wjy.49.1409607160687; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (5ec2dc90.skybroadband.com. [94.194.220.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm4818277wjv.6.2014.09.01.14.32.39 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:32:38 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best solution for encrypting a mountpoint? Message-ID: <20140901223238.4ea8f171@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <540341C8.2040003@tysdomain.com> <201408311611.s7VGBVP9050225@fire.js.berklix.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:32:42 -0000 On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:48:57 -0500 Adam Vande More wrote: > Additionally I prefer geli over gbde since it supports a wider > variety of feature and is perhaps more secure. See the corresponding > handbook and man pages for details. I think it's unfortunate that the handbook gives so much prominence to gbde. Most people using it switched to geli when it came out, and it doesn't seemed have any development since then. I don't see any good reason to put it on a new partition, geli is better all round. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:38:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B63DA7B for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E08150B for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s81LcD2v083782 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:38:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s81LcDxs083779; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:38:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:38:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: David Benfell Subject: Re: controlled environment for regular expressions? In-Reply-To: <20140901204147.GA53086@home.parts-unknown.org> Message-ID: References: <20140901204147.GA53086@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:38:14 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:38:24 -0000 On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, David Benfell wrote: > Hi all, > > I am having a major problem with regular expression matching returning > different results when run from a script under cron or as a delivery > instruction from postfix rather than from the command line. > > I don't even know how to debug this. These are all in scripts and > delivery instructions that I have had working for over a decade. And > when I run them from the command line, they work as expected. > > The path for seeking executables should not be at issue. I use the > PATH variable in my crontabs and set it to the same PATH as at a > terminal. > > I have encountered this problem with both grep and GNU sed (gsed, from > the port). > > This is all stuff that worked until recently, and worked for years > under Linux. The only change I think I've made is to implement an IPv6 > tunnel. I hope, really hope, I can safely say that's irrelevant. > > I use zsh, also a choice that's over a decade old, for both my command > line and to run scripts. > > I've never liked regular expressions. I think they are an awful > kludge. But unfortunately, a major part of my workflow depends on them > working correctly and *predictably*. > > Has anyone else encountered problems with this? How do you fix it? An example would be useful. My first guess is that the regexes are working, but some invisible whitespace like carriage returns has snuck into the values. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:44:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3562DD5D; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (smtp1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBD51737; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 65534) id C27E320E70892; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DOS_OE_TO_MX, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,RDNS_DYNAMIC,STOX_REPLY_TYPE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from r2d2 (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.141.170]) by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9751020E7088F; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <88395BA14462465DB1E28AF4A946EC42@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Per olof Ljungmark" , References: <5404E1D2.1020201@intersonic.se> Subject: Re: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:44:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:44:29 -0000 Have you made sure you have rebuilt all php libs? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Per olof Ljungmark" To: Cc: Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 10:14 PM Subject: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data > Sorry for the cross-post but this is a bit out of the ordinary for me. > > In short, no matter how I try varoius changes, I am unable to run > www/horde-base under latest 10-STABLE. The error is: > > HORDE: Could not pack data. [pid 80949 on line 154 of > "/usr/local/share/pear/Horde/Pack.php"] > > From what I gather, Pack.php deals with compressing data before cache, > maybe also before sending to browser. Problem occurs both through > Apache > and with php cli. > > Facts: > The same config ran on 10-STABLE mid-August > Stopped working after updating to latest 10-STABLE end last week > (27th.) > Same config runs fine on 9-STABLE. Today I did a fresh 9-STABLE, got > Horde up and running fine. Updated the system to 10-STABLE. rebuilt > all > ports and the error is back. > > Please, if anyone has ANY idea what is going on? If I was fluent in > PHP > I assume I could figure out myself... > > Thank you! > > //per > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:51:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A4DFC4; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538DB181C; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:51:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <5404EA59.2060004@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:51:21 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data References: <5404E1D2.1020201@intersonic.se> <88395BA14462465DB1E28AF4A946EC42@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <88395BA14462465DB1E28AF4A946EC42@multiplay.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:51:26 -0000 On 09/01/14 23:44, Steven Hartland wrote: > Have you made sure you have rebuilt all php libs? Yes, twice, portmaster -fa Also, a fresh install of 10-STABLE yielded same result as upgrading 9. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Per olof Ljungmark" > To: > Cc: > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 10:14 PM > Subject: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not > pack data > > >> Sorry for the cross-post but this is a bit out of the ordinary for me. >> >> In short, no matter how I try varoius changes, I am unable to run >> www/horde-base under latest 10-STABLE. The error is: >> >> HORDE: Could not pack data. [pid 80949 on line 154 of >> "/usr/local/share/pear/Horde/Pack.php"] >> >> From what I gather, Pack.php deals with compressing data before cache, >> maybe also before sending to browser. Problem occurs both through Apache >> and with php cli. >> >> Facts: >> The same config ran on 10-STABLE mid-August >> Stopped working after updating to latest 10-STABLE end last week (27th.) >> Same config runs fine on 9-STABLE. Today I did a fresh 9-STABLE, got >> Horde up and running fine. Updated the system to 10-STABLE. rebuilt all >> ports and the error is back. >> >> Please, if anyone has ANY idea what is going on? If I was fluent in PHP >> I assume I could figure out myself... >> >> Thank you! >> >> //per >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Intersonic AB Registered in Solna, Sweden SE556539368201 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 22:19:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD28D69D for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE811A1E for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.15]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s81MJaeP020841 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:19:36 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id s81MJaEe014377; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:19:36 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201409012219.s81MJaEe014377@sdf.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:19:36 -0500 To: paul@kraus-haus.org Subject: Re: gvinum raid5 vs. ZFS raidz References: <201408020621.s726LsiA024208@sdf.org> <53DCDBE8.8060704@qeng-ho.org> <201408060556.s765uKJA026937@sdf.org> <53E1FF5F.1050500@qeng-ho.org> <201408070831.s778VhJc015365@sdf.org> <201408070936.s779akMv017524@sdf.org> <201408071106.s77B6JCI005742@sdf.org> <5B99AAB4-C8CB-45A9-A6F0-1F8B08221917@kraus-haus.org> <201408220940.s7M9e6pZ008296@sdf.org> <7971D6CA-AEE3-447D-8D09-8AC0B9CC6DBE@kraus-haus.org> <201408260641.s7Q6feBc004970@sdf.org> <9588077E-1198-45AF-8C4A-606C46C6E4F8@kraus-haus.org> <201408280636.s7S6a5OZ022667@sdf.org> <25B567A0-6639-41EE-AB3E-96AFBA3F11B7@kraus-haus.org> <201408300147.s7U1leJP024616@sdf.org> <58E30C52-A12C-4D9E-95D6-5BFB7A05FE46@kraus-haus.org> <201408310749.s7V7nVsf025094@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 22:19:48 -0000 Paul Kraus wrote: > On Aug 31, 2014, at 3:49, Scott Bennett wrote: > > Paul Kraus wrote: > > >> I typically run a scrub on any new drive after writing a bunch of data to it, specifically to look for infant mortality :-) > > > > Looks like a good idea. Whenever I get the raidz2 set up and some > > sizable amount of data loaded into it, I intend to do the same. However, > > because the capacity of the 6-drive raidz2 will be about four times the > > original UFS2 capacity, I suppose I'll need to find a way to expand the > > dump file in other ways, so as to cover the misbehaving tracks on the > > individual drives. > > I?m not sure I would worry about exercising the entire range of tracks on the platters, if a platter has a problem (heads or coating) it will likely show up all over the platter. If the problem is specific to a region, I would expect the drive to be able to remap the bad sectors (as we previously discussed). I have no way of knowing where on the drive the long strings of errors occurred except in the sense of which partition I was dealing with. Some of the erroneous bytes were in groups of 100-300 bytes (roughly), which means the errors were concentrated in a number places, as well as there being many individual bytes scattered around the file. UFS2 puts blocks where it will, so the groups could be anywhere in the partition and might not always involve contiguous sectors. > > >> Don?t go by what *I* say, go the manufacturer?s web sites and download and read the full specifications on the drives you are looking at. None of the sales sites (Newegg, CDW, etc.) post the full specs, yet they are all (still) available from the Seagate / Western Digital / HGST etc. web sites. > > > > Yes, I understood that from what you had already written. What I meant > > was that I hadn't been aware that the manufacturers were selling the drives > > divided into two differing grades of reliability. From now on, the issue > > will be a matter of my budget vs. the price differences. > > Sorry If I was being overly descriptive, I am more of a math and science guy than an english guy, so my writing is often not the most clear. When I started buying Enterprise instead of Desktop drives the price difference was under $20 for a $100 drive. The biggest reason I started buying the Enterprise drives is that they are RATED for 24x7 operation, while Desktop are typically designed for 8x5 (but rarely do they say :-) While I do have my desktop and laptop systems setup to spin down the drives when not in use (and I leave some of them booted 24x7), my server(s) run 24x7 and THAT is where I pay for the Enterprise drives. I treat the drives in the laptop / desktop systems as disposable and do NOT keep any important data only on them (I rsync my laptop to the server a couple times per week and use TimeMachine when at the office). > > > > > Okay. Thanks again for the info. Just out of curiosity, where do you > > usually find those Hitachi drives? > I saw Hitachi desktop drives at Fry's today, but no enterprise Hitachis. > > Newegg ? Once they lean red how to ship drives without destroying them I started buying drives from them :-) > I'm having some issues with newegg at present. One big bitch I have is that their web site (like so unfortunately many others) requires the use of an unsecured web browser to get them to work right, so I get help from friends who are clueless about computer security. Then I spend two hours struggling with their checkout procedure to complete a purchase and end up empty-handed because the web site refuses to let me buy something at the special promotional price sent to me via an email message. The next day (this past Friday) I call newegg's customer [dis]service number and talk with a gal who tells me that she can't find a problem but has just sent a message to their "IT" department and will call me back after she gets a reply from that department. She says that should be long before they closed for the holiday weekend. Naturally, she did not call back, but that the particular item I asked about would still be at the promotional price through Wed. this week, so there would be plenty of time to straighten it out. Feh. But today there is a new and pleasant development. The same email message also had a promotional price for a 2 TB WD desktop internal drive of ~$90 and the same drive in the enterprise grade level for ~$145. Next, I checked the Fri. _Trib_ for the Fry's ad and found a sale price through Wed. for the same desktop drive for $80. Beside that item in the ad pages, there was a listing for the enterprise grade of the same drive, but said to call them for prices. The surprise was that a friend went into the suburbs today on other business and took me with him, so I could go to Fry's on the way back. A few feet to the right on the same shelf as the $80 desktop drive was a bunch of the enterprise drives for...$90, the same price that newegg wanted for the desktop drive and only $10 more than the desktop drive's price at Fry's. 8--) So I bought one of the enterprise drives, which I will use to replace a dead 1 TB WD drive in a WD MyBook case that has USB 2.0, Firewire 400, and eSATA interfaces on it. :-) So...one down and one more to go. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 23:28:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBCF391 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986C71014 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-108.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s81NSXdf010533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:28:33 -0500 Message-ID: <54050298.7060206@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:34:48 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddball occurence .... References: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> <2474524.BSIK5QZ5L1@matrix020.matrix.net> In-Reply-To: <2474524.BSIK5QZ5L1@matrix020.matrix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:28:35 -0000 On 09/01/14 14:16, 4711@chello.at wrote: > On Monday 01 September 2014 08:37:57 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> .... I have been online for the last hour or so, E-mails, a bit of >> browsing, etc. I noticed my DSL modem light was flashing furiously, >> indicating traffic. I wasn't doing anything right then, so I poked >> around a bit: >> >> >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:27:40am] 461 % netstat >> Active Internet connections >> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) >> tcp4 0 0 jaguar.56481 fly.hiwaay.net.pop3 LAST_ACK >> tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED >> tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED > [snip] > > ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de (141.41.9.9) is listed as mastersite for mysql- and some > mozilla.org-ports. Maybe your machine just downloaded some distfiles for port > building. > > % cat /usr/ports/Mk/*.sites.* | grep wolfen > ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/www/mozilla/%SUBDIR%/ \ > ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/database/mysql/Downloads/%SUBDIR%/ \ > > Cheers > ch > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Yup, they're there .... false alarm :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 23:31:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E457437 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683991054 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-108.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s81NVX1G011583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:31:34 -0500 Message-ID: <5405034C.1060804@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:37:48 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: oddball occurence .... References: <540476B5.7080107@hiwaay.net> <20140901194431.f2a33b87.freebsd@edvax.de> <5404BBDF.90804@hiwaay.net> <20140901211806.7935e5d5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140901211806.7935e5d5.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:31:35 -0000 On 09/01/14 14:18, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:33:03 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 09/01/14 12:44, Polytropon wrote: >>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:37:57 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> i.e. someone apparently FTP-ing .... *something* to or from my computer >>>> ?!?!?! I don't think this should be happening (see immediately above) >>>> .... What gives ?!?!?! >>> >From your output: >>> >>> tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED >>> tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED >>> >>> Those are strange port numbers. Are you downloading something >>> from them? But then... ESTABLISHED doesn't mean CONNECTED... >>> >>> What does "sockstat -l" say? >> Too late for that ? > That's a strange program message. :-) I thought it needed to be done while things were happening .... [root@kabini1, /etc, 6:33:59pm] 531 % sockstat -l USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root lpd 27062 5 stream /var/run/printer root lpd 27062 6 tcp6 *:515 *:* root lpd 27062 7 tcp4 *:515 *:* wam dbus-daemo 1008 3 stream /tmp/dbus-oew1cXGFD4 wam xfce4-sess 1001 7 stream /tmp/.ICE-unix/1001 root Xorg 985 1 tcp6 *:6000 *:* root Xorg 985 3 tcp4 *:6000 *:* root Xorg 985 4 stream /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 root sendmail 869 3 tcp4 127.0.0.1:25 *:* root sshd 866 3 tcp6 *:22 *:* root sshd 866 4 tcp4 *:22 *:* messagebus dbus-daemo808 3 stream /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket daemon rwhod 784 3 udp4 *:513 *:* root ntpd 775 20 udp4 *:123 *:* root ntpd 775 21 udp6 *:123 *:* root ntpd 775 22 udp4 192.168.0.27:123 *:* root ntpd 775 23 udp6 fe80:1::d250:99ff:fe13:e385:123 *:* root ntpd 775 24 udp6 ::1:123 *:* root ntpd 775 25 udp6 fe80:9::1:123 *:* root ntpd 775 26 udp4 127.0.0.1:123 *:* root nfsd 737 5 tcp4 *:2049 *:* root nfsd 737 6 tcp6 *:2049 *:* root mountd 735 5 udp6 *:849 *:* root mountd 735 6 tcp6 *:849 *:* root mountd 735 7 udp4 *:849 *:* root mountd 735 8 tcp4 *:849 *:* root amd 687 4 udp4 *:1023 *:* root amd 687 5 udp4 *:1022 *:* root amd 687 6 tcp4 *:907 *:* root amd 687 7 udp4 *:928 *:* root rpcbind 685 4 udp6 *:* *:* root rpcbind 685 5 stream /var/run/rpcbind.sock root rpcbind 685 6 udp6 *:111 *:* root rpcbind 685 7 udp6 *:658 *:* root rpcbind 685 8 tcp6 *:111 *:* root rpcbind 685 9 udp4 *:111 *:* root rpcbind 685 10 udp4 *:743 *:* root rpcbind 685 11 tcp4 *:111 *:* root syslogd 647 4 dgram /var/run/log root syslogd 647 5 dgram /var/run/logpriv root syslogd 647 6 udp6 *:514 *:* root syslogd 647 7 udp4 *:514 *:* root devd 490 4 stream /var/run/devd.pipe ? ? ? ? udp6 *:2049 *:* ? ? ? ? udp4 *:2049 *:* [root@kabini1, /etc, 6:35:06pm] 532 % > > > >>> But there are also SSH sessions which could be scp? But that >>> would imply that authorized users are using it, because you >>> probably don't run publish SSH without password on your >>> system. :-) >> >> I run ssh internally & to my ISP using keys, no passwords, I thought >> that was more secure :-/ .... I am not supposed to be allowing >> connections from outside my LAN to any of my boxen .... > Okay, so the SSH sessions are to be expected and authorized. > > > >>> Regarding the address: >>> >>>> inetnum: 141.41.0.0 - 141.41.255.255 >>>> netname: FH-WOLFENBUETTEL >>>> descr: Fachhochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbuettel >>> That's probably NTP. The FH Braunschweig is probably in >>> relation (IP-wise) with the PTB which is providing a >>> "nuclear time" input for NTP. >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physikalisch-Technische_Bundesanstalt >>> >>> You're running ntpd? >> >> Yeah, but w/ local server & peers only .... > The ntpd and ntpdate need a source to sync, maybe the PTB > is involved here? Depending on if you have "sync on start" > or "continuous monitoring", connections may appear once or > from time to time. > > > >> Tried from shell account @ my ISP, it said nmap not found, maybe need >> root to run, but that was a nogo .... > Maybe not installed? The nmap tool is an additional program, > and running it does not require being root, only some tests > that nmap can do need to be performed as root, but a normal > TCP scan should not require it. > > > >> tried from inside, this box & 1 other, I get the following: >> >> from other machine, FC14 server: >> >> >> [root@Q6600:/etc, Mon Sep 01, 01:23 PM] 1012 # nmap -A -T4 192.168.0.27 >> >> Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-09-01 13:24 CDT >> Nmap scan report for JAGUAR (192.168.0.27) >> Host is up (0.00018s latency). >> Not shown: 995 closed ports >> PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION >> 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 6.6.1_hpn13v11 (FreeBSD 20140420; >> protocol 2.0) > Intended. > > > >> 111/tcp open rpcbind >> 2049/tcp open rpcbind > That's for NFS. > > > >> 515/tcp open printer BSD lpd (Unauthorized host) >> 6000/tcp open X11 (access denied) > I don't see FTP open here. This just means you cannot FTP > _into_ the machine, but you can FTP _out of_ the machine. > Maybe some download that caught your attention? Or a web > browser's FTP connection (ftp://...) to, for example, the > FreeBSD FTP server? > > For example, when downloading from: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/10.0-RELEASE > > with a web browser, I see: > > # netstat -a | grep ftp > tcp4 0 0 r56.46684 ftp.beastie.tdk..58441 ESTABLISHED > tcp4 0 0 r56.40750 ftp.beastie.tdk..ftp ESTABLISHED > > Ha, I think we have it now - this output looks similar to > yours. Compare: > > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.12990 141.41.9.9.35089 ESTABLISHED > tcp4 0 0 jaguar.23210 141.41.9.9.ftp ESTABLISHED > > It seems that you've downloaded something from that machine. > This machine _is_ running a FTP server. For example, it seems > to host openoffice.org data, as well as Linux stuff. > > Your nmap output suggests that _you_ are not running a FTP > server. > > Chasing ghosts... ;-) > > -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 02:59:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D8C58DB for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE461596 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XOeJz-0000z8-E8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:59:51 -0700 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:59:51 -0700 (PDT) From: nadia61 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1409626791432-5944529.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20100313225059.158207FE98D@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> References: <20100313225059.158207FE98D@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Panasonic TV MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:59:52 -0000 FreeBSD provides support for PCI-based TV cards. Not sure what it all means though, my concern is usually to get the best tv brands out there and Panasonic definitely is in that list. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-on-Panasonic-TV-tp3779169p5944529.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 06:17:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 448016B4 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 235931C36 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8A4258C1092B; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:17:21 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Warren Block Subject: Re: controlled environment for regular expressions? Message-ID: <20140902061721.GA90979@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20140901204147.GA53086@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:17:28 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:38:13PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, David Benfell wrote: >=20 > > Hi all, > > > > I am having a major problem with regular expression matching returning > > different results when run from a script under cron or as a delivery > > instruction from postfix rather than from the command line. > > > > I don't even know how to debug this. These are all in scripts and > > delivery instructions that I have had working for over a decade. And > > when I run them from the command line, they work as expected. > > > > The path for seeking executables should not be at issue. I use the > > PATH variable in my crontabs and set it to the same PATH as at a > > terminal. > > > > I have encountered this problem with both grep and GNU sed (gsed, from > > the port). > > > > This is all stuff that worked until recently, and worked for years > > under Linux. The only change I think I've made is to implement an IPv6 > > tunnel. I hope, really hope, I can safely say that's irrelevant. > > > > I use zsh, also a choice that's over a decade old, for both my command > > line and to run scripts. > > > > I've never liked regular expressions. I think they are an awful > > kludge. But unfortunately, a major part of my workflow depends on them > > working correctly and *predictably*. > > > > Has anyone else encountered problems with this? How do you fix it? >=20 > An example would be useful. My first guess is that the regexes are=20 > working, but some invisible whitespace like carriage returns has snuck=20 > into the values. I've been pondering how to respond to this. It's all deeply buried in how I sort email, which is with my own mail delivery agent written in perl. The MDA provides the option to call an external program, in this case, grep, and sort or not sort a message into the associated Maildir based on the exit code. One of these instances is where I search the email headers with: /usr/bin/grep "^Subject: Cron"' =46rom the command line, it matches every time on this header: Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/pycardsyncer and properly sorts the message. But when this MDA is called either from a cron job or with postfix's delivery instruction, it now fails every time. I haven't modified this MDA in a while. I wrote it years ago. The last change I made to the delivery script was in 2011. I've been using it continuously for probably over a decade. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUBWDxAAoJEBV64x4SNmArK+UP/3IUYvDcJ/Taqz6sbNRep5OC +1aNe2Moqke/tzNAYagUSHxtqNWEUw0g3RYI+uZuaG4Mf4nU/dUXMVN96zJ0SVAT +9M1HUu7EV6wLnGa4klC/ddw/GLqDeIIDSV06+pDC1xb3hWPmJV73gbMDjdZjGcS GcAiL85vRco0ztieG+GlJTbv03sh2BkQAWzUy7U8d5YbU654Qjp2kU8JMZjSSsTL saAjZ+pwiQeJQH+18S1X5sG7JjDH8X/puKAXxTwLYy9q4KQqQWAYmRV2E3Wbct35 urRlOhwki8aTUXnkMkWAEiYQfCkdVC7bsD4qdqwp+aMnCWZ27dRLrahtw3Mt1r7O WMrklqow1O90cur8bhAEsTRrqxw5jONMs5QuOt4QOBMuIRHnuzsgvO5TC6lBTUdD Cfb8cft75wxlOEPlm5qhWMtKVDKn+fDq7at2LNyxeVmsiLtvY5/AS7MKY3mFmE4E d/NGgj2+dYyyZoc6OBbtf5eLAWnkwCXstpOvawdEMzs78EjhiP2//YB+9CF/R0HG jzXeWpxbmDSHUC/Y0UOnj8jcunap8Ld8pxb5ZVui6rf1L14tI1tuCXctItbynEf3 GqI9RahjYh1gCzfifJ2Wc44v5Zs/xpagvbgmhxCXTBV+BUxxQS6S4+nJTp3yiQZu GQmQICgvNU6G5Y0Rkdlv =VYkE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 08:07:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE829EC for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E10B18DD for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0803CCFF; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:07:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8287ZQL001919; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:07:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:07:35 +0200 From: Polytropon To: kpneal@pobox.com Subject: Re: how to install wireless n.i.c. on FreeBSD 9.1 Message-Id: <20140902100735.5c57c3ee.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140901220045.GA49707@neutralgood.org> References: <20140823025527.bd80818d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140826022802.198cd285.freebsd@edvax.de> <3f1e44ea23fb755ae9f8e2390ab2a3d6@surewest.net> <20140830200831.GB12450@neutralgood.org> <20140831103329.18f5b713.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140901220045.GA49707@neutralgood.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:07:41 -0000 On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:00:46 -0400, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > The advantage of gvim, aside from using different settings for colors and > fonts, is that vim/gvim handles damn-that's-huge huge files very, very > well. We're talking a couple of seconds to open a multi-million line file. > And boy is is responsive. It's dependencies for installation also are acceptable. > The catch is the lines must be normal length. If you have text in an MVS > dataset (with fixed size blocks), and you convert EBCDIC to ASCII with dd, > AND you don't have the line lengths in sync between MVS and dd, then what > you get is a file that only has one line but that line is millions of > characters long. Don't do that. This requires an additional step of inserting a line break every n characters (where n often is 80, but for data files often more). By the way, there's _one_ feature that I didn't find in gvim, and especially in regards of column-oriented data files, this would be really helpful: a real COLUMN RULER on top. As a grown-old mainframe person, I'm thinking about something like this: |...+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6 Something that you would recognize from ISPF/PDF or SEU. It could also look like this: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0 Or this: ....+... 1 ...+... 2 ...+... 3 ...+... 4 ...+... 5 ...+... 6 Is there a way to add this to gvim? Ideally it should accomodate to the "set nowrap" or "set wrap" setting (lines longer than the window width are either wrapped or scrolled horizontally). It should be shown on top of the current view (no matter how far you are into the file vertically). Any idea? > I used to use nvi/vi for simply large files until our admin contacted me > about the ongoing space issues in "/var/tmp". Oops. Now if I want to look > at those files in nvi I use the "-F" option. Yes, this directory is used by vi, and it's not subject to the automatic cleaning of /tmp. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:10:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5C17AC1; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BFA918BB; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 131so3887568ykp.26 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:10:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=o9CQn1LSZNQrROzwNkbCbIz7pu2JM7jj4zaTOp3Klq8=; b=U6vnBwwisJPx6eKHPBACKWRdMliiUYYHO9N1NWlekCl0DSnXU6C+4r66/SWpMXV9uO 5TYJfHV7AUTZrx/s1Q/Kf/dashK/cX43qNP34mXw3QNdYYhEQGR9xrZLNASCwY7fejlx w7D+odoj8JGmAfydzNFShTotzS2KF6WANHYRNOi1uIMZAMKPcGd//Q4Or3Qrmut2VFNl AKZcvZ55bwB40eVLXNQxaw0uV2X4FqXDSgjjBJC4JCBnllyX6BB4fgmSIQ2zebItyJx3 xK/qDuKTU/vPVVWu/gdTaPQy9iwpNdF0atjceHlf4fFmuMKCyBZ2D1n2/8B+IB2DlYOK vyfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.123.114 with SMTP id u78mr10990268yhh.107.1409652609526; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.156.139 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:10:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Stable SCTP_ECN_SUPPORTED build issues From: krad To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:10:10 -0000 Has anyone seen this issue building freebsd stable recently. I have tried removing my src.conf and make.conf but nothing makes a difference? The obj tree was also manually deleted. [root@z /usr/src/lib/libc]# svnup stable # Revision: 270962 # Protocol: http # Address: svn0.eu.freebsd.org # Port: 80 # Branch: base/stable/10 # Target: /usr/src # Trim tree: No # Show extra files: No # Known files directory: /var/tmp/svnup # yes is did do a full buildworld before i ran this [root@z /usr/src/lib/libc]# make /usr/bin/clang -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64 -DNLS -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/libc-vis -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -I/usr/src/lib/libc/resolv -D_ACL_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libmd -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/jemalloc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/tzcode/stdtime -I/usr/src/lib/libc/stdtime -I/usr/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/usr/src/lib/libc/rpc -DNS_CACHING -DSYMBOL_VERSIONING -std=gnu99 -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -c /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c -o sctp_sys_calls.o /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:353:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_ECN_SUPPORTED' case SCTP_ECN_SUPPORTED: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:356:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_PR_SUPPORTED' case SCTP_PR_SUPPORTED: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:359:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_AUTH_SUPPORTED' case SCTP_AUTH_SUPPORTED: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:362:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_ASCONF_SUPPORTED' case SCTP_ASCONF_SUPPORTED: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:365:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_RECONFIG_SUPPORTED' case SCTP_RECONFIG_SUPPORTED: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:368:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_NRSACK_SUPPORTED' case SCTP_NRSACK_SUPPORTED: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:371:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_PKTDROP_SUPPORTED' case SCTP_PKTDROP_SUPPORTED: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:380:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_PR_STREAM_STATUS' case SCTP_PR_STREAM_STATUS: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:381:32: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct sctp_prstatus' ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:381:12: note: forward declaration of 'struct sctp_prstatus' ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:383:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCTP_PR_ASSOC_STATUS' case SCTP_PR_ASSOC_STATUS: ^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:384:32: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct sctp_prstatus' ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^ /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:381:12: note: forward declaration of 'struct sctp_prstatus' ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; ^ 11 errors generated. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/src/lib/libc here is my build env setup [root@carrera /usr/src/lib/libc]# grep -v "#" /etc/src.conf /etc/make.conf /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="yes" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_GAMES="yes" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_HTML="yes" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_IPFILTER="yes" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_IPFW="yes" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_IPX="yes" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_LIB32="YES" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_PORTSNAP="YES" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_ATM="YES" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=YES /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_BSNMP="YES" /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=YES /etc/src.conf: /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_INFO=yes /etc/src.conf:WITH_UNBOUND=yes /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_WIRELESS= /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_WPA_SUPPLICANT_EAPOL= /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_RADIUS= /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_NCP= /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_NDIS= /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_NIS= /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_LPR= /etc/src.conf: /etc/make.conf:USA_RESIDENT=NO /etc/make.conf:SVN_UPDATE=YES /etc/make.conf:XFREE8pro_VERSION= 4 /etc/make.conf:KERNCONF=me /etc/make.conf:KERNCONFDIR=/etc/kernel /etc/make.conf:BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED="115200" /etc/make.conf:FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS=-p /etc/make.conf: /etc/make.conf:LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=YES" /etc/make.conf:LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=yes /etc/make.conf:FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=1 /etc/make.conf: /etc/make.conf:WITH_CTF=1 /etc/make.conf:STRIP= /etc/make.conf: /etc/make.conf:CC=/usr/bin/clang /etc/make.conf:CXX=/usr/bin/clang++ /etc/make.conf: /etc/make.conf:WITH_PKGNG= yes /etc/make.conf:PF_ENABLE_FILTER_RULES=yes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:30:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7E8328 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F97C1B9C for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E39160B05 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:22:07 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received:received; s= selector1; t=1409653326; x=1411467727; bh=0cjk985W9vyiDv83HkWO+D xlAObZXDVL2Ii3FUayQy4=; b=YKkb5cHutSCx+q+gs7nzpI8I73UpPcdDTXg0ac r/M1yqwr+8YeRbwLjgi+eqYbDkDYsbUEn2CDA2fb1A9RaS7Q0dWFyu48xY5BOi53 Cmr+edBHAoJcdyrZErM/BmR7+r+SrwFhIz96nHn0hh7O5kp6hQLiB8G05EIVJusU sJBG0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id A2RcS7MFxZWG for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:22:06 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3CFE160B04 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:22:06 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s82AMD3R076711; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:22:13 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) From: Olivier Nicole To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: mod_jk kills NFS? Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:22:13 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:30:29 -0000 Hi, Anytime I try to load the module mod_jk on apache2.2, on FreeBSD 9.3, it kills my NFS client connection: $ /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22 start Performing sanity check on apache22 configuration: Syntax OK Starting apache22. nfs server oak1000:/home: lockd not responding nfs server oak1000:/home: lockd not responding nfs server oak1000:/home: lockd not responding nfs server oak1000:/home: lockd not responding nfs server oak1000:/home: lockd not responding nfs server oak1000:/home: lockd not responding nfs server oak1000:/home: lockd not responding ... So far, the only way to stop that is to comment out the LoadModule jk_module... in Apache configuration. Any idea? I found nothing on Google. TIA, Olivier -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:42:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA96778; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505631CD8; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q200so4024196ykb.9 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:42:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nAsdtjDpUs1GB0HsNKR7qFVbdFH2wyY2C4JLdu5FVwo=; b=Yu1BKt2/UK8b2/zQtAYOBh45N231GkEDxeH+ewo1waMypnTeKkvYmirnuZ9DhRlMZc xqnr3kYebo6eyk0Ng4oNnx7BQurVa1xaU8cRAJkd1yognGXfKxcaLQA5StnywfTGgu/Q MOVldj68V1A6xsJZeV/aabfiNZtXXCeVftUROWe6xWx8+vRDlm7l5n8FNaW51nLnPgpM JGygIoI/GwsICxFxkzN2kM3AWPimg3mHr51QDQ4GRflGUOgQiq/Su9BRY8EBIBCH7M3/ oQPKORmvNqIrzImnfVmzxSB8/G2JzyV33ASlDDJB9YpcsbDDU7WNVXcTQ0N3v1+dFh5O W76Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.133.165 with SMTP id q25mr50530853yhi.62.1409654574809; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.156.139 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:42:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:42:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Stable SCTP_ECN_SUPPORTED build issues From: krad To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:42:56 -0000 ignore this it seems to be working now 8/ On 2 September 2014 11:10, krad wrote: > Has anyone seen this issue building freebsd stable recently. I have tried > removing my src.conf and make.conf but nothing makes a difference? The obj > tree was also manually deleted. > > > [root@z /usr/src/lib/libc]# svnup stable > # Revision: 270962 > # Protocol: http > # Address: svn0.eu.freebsd.org > # Port: 80 > # Branch: base/stable/10 > # Target: /usr/src > # Trim tree: No > # Show extra files: No > # Known files directory: /var/tmp/svnup > > # yes is did do a full buildworld before i ran this > [root@z /usr/src/lib/libc]# make > /usr/bin/clang -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include > -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64 -DNLS > -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa > -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/libc-vis -DINET6 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -I/usr/src/lib/libc/resolv -D_ACL_PRIVATE > -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libmd > -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/jemalloc/include > -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/tzcode/stdtime > -I/usr/src/lib/libc/stdtime -I/usr/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES > -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/usr/src/lib/libc/rpc -DNS_CACHING > -DSYMBOL_VERSIONING -std=gnu99 -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector > -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized > -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int > -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value > -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion > -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -c > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c -o sctp_sys_calls.o > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:353:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_ECN_SUPPORTED' > case SCTP_ECN_SUPPORTED: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:356:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_PR_SUPPORTED' > case SCTP_PR_SUPPORTED: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:359:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_AUTH_SUPPORTED' > case SCTP_AUTH_SUPPORTED: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:362:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_ASCONF_SUPPORTED' > case SCTP_ASCONF_SUPPORTED: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:365:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_RECONFIG_SUPPORTED' > case SCTP_RECONFIG_SUPPORTED: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:368:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_NRSACK_SUPPORTED' > case SCTP_NRSACK_SUPPORTED: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:371:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_PKTDROP_SUPPORTED' > case SCTP_PKTDROP_SUPPORTED: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:380:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_PR_STREAM_STATUS' > case SCTP_PR_STREAM_STATUS: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:381:32: error: incomplete > definition of type 'struct sctp_prstatus' > ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:381:12: note: forward declaration > of 'struct sctp_prstatus' > ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:383:7: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'SCTP_PR_ASSOC_STATUS' > case SCTP_PR_ASSOC_STATUS: > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:384:32: error: incomplete > definition of type 'struct sctp_prstatus' > ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^ > /usr/src/lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c:381:12: note: forward declaration > of 'struct sctp_prstatus' > ((struct sctp_prstatus *)arg)->sprstat_assoc_id = id; > ^ > 11 errors generated. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/src/lib/libc > > > here is my build env setup > > [root@carrera /usr/src/lib/libc]# grep -v "#" /etc/src.conf /etc/make.conf > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="yes" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_GAMES="yes" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_HTML="yes" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_IPFILTER="yes" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_IPFW="yes" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_IPX="yes" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_LIB32="YES" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_PORTSNAP="YES" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_ATM="YES" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=YES > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_BSNMP="YES" > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=YES > /etc/src.conf: > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_INFO=yes > /etc/src.conf:WITH_UNBOUND=yes > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_WIRELESS= > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_WPA_SUPPLICANT_EAPOL= > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_RADIUS= > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_NCP= > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_NDIS= > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_NIS= > /etc/src.conf:WITHOUT_LPR= > /etc/src.conf: > /etc/make.conf:USA_RESIDENT=NO > /etc/make.conf:SVN_UPDATE=YES > /etc/make.conf:XFREE8pro_VERSION= 4 > /etc/make.conf:KERNCONF=me > /etc/make.conf:KERNCONFDIR=/etc/kernel > /etc/make.conf:BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED="115200" > /etc/make.conf:FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS=-p > /etc/make.conf: > /etc/make.conf:LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=YES" > /etc/make.conf:LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=yes > /etc/make.conf:FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=1 > /etc/make.conf: > /etc/make.conf:WITH_CTF=1 > /etc/make.conf:STRIP= > /etc/make.conf: > /etc/make.conf:CC=/usr/bin/clang > /etc/make.conf:CXX=/usr/bin/clang++ > /etc/make.conf: > /etc/make.conf:WITH_PKGNG= yes > /etc/make.conf:PF_ENABLE_FILTER_RULES=yes > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:11:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDA4B382 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6398713C5 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s82DBjmD053802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:11:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s82DBjTg053799; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:11:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:11:45 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: David Benfell Subject: Re: controlled environment for regular expressions? In-Reply-To: <20140902061721.GA90979@home.parts-unknown.org> Message-ID: References: <20140901204147.GA53086@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140902061721.GA90979@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:11:45 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:11:47 -0000 On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, David Benfell wrote: > I've been pondering how to respond to this. It's all deeply buried in > how I sort email, which is with my own mail delivery agent written in > perl. > > The MDA provides the option to call an external program, in this case, > grep, and sort or not sort a message into the associated Maildir based > on the exit code. > > One of these instances is where I search the email headers with: > > /usr/bin/grep "^Subject: Cron"' There is an extra single quote at the end of that line. > From the command line, it matches every time on this header: > > Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/pycardsyncer > > and properly sorts the message. > > But when this MDA is called either from a cron job or with postfix's > delivery instruction, it now fails every time. To see if the problem is with cron, I'd add a test cron job that just manually runs the test: echo "Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/pycardsyncer" | /usr/bin/grep -q "^Subject: Cron" && echo "matched" If that works, it's not a problem with cron or grep, and I'd proceed to do that same test but piping the actual test message in another cron job. Maybe also piping it to a file to see if it is being changed somehow in terms of whitespace or unescaped characters. > I haven't modified this MDA in a while. I wrote it years ago. The last > change I made to the delivery script was in 2011. I've been using it > continuously for probably over a decade. I would still suspect underlying things. Other thoughts: If the MDA is Perl, why use grep? Also: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/maildrop.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:23:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25B46F1 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F10157B for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:23:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36592332 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:23:19 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s82DNIbh086235 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:23:19 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s82DNIAx086234 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:23:18 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:23:18 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-ID: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:23:23 -0000 Colleagues, Could you please help me solve the problem with screen or xterm? From a FreeBSD 9.3 xterm I ssh to a remote host. The "Home" key sends (and the remote application receives) "0x1B 0x5B 0x48" (ESC [ H) which is correct. However, if I start screen on the remote host, the application within the screen's virtual terminal receives "0x1B 0x4F 0x48" for "Home" which is "ESC O H". It results im the "Home" and key not working correctly in vim etc. The "End" key has the same problem. Could someone with a knowledge of screen and termcap in general help me figure out why the keys are so mangled and what I could do to fix this? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:28:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8398CACA for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f72.google.com (mail-pa0-f72.google.com [209.85.220.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3F71723 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f72.google.com with SMTP id eu11so73110439pac.11 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uRPJdYhgeNJNQqGj29Pzm12iFoLykwOZLSFKv76J9Mk=; b=GnNNEZd8P9rWr9+bR+WHPV6NQA4L1leH5chxo2CmAdCBHha8bA9zg19JYDEKeErNUj acCWYnWbgKxHUgb00q1r2aUDx+9+gfCKp4KPefWnU7bTnHAUSi8qxnMbjvipdozbLr4b 7yYFy+ngDzz1c3gZzQL9WOWYm5qNyixbhoDpZLFRfsQKEzdg7xIsRpyUwodLWk3ApRGg qw73pRrUoZ8wR4F0cZRIQ6+/7GfNJT+ZCbRsPws8Iqjz4x+EU9GXizkqmkiJQbnVNshH W6J7S36oBMJGq0tK5G5Luy+Fc4xbKiBHHiyc7W9poQhkNkANSCH1+nDnr0EfEtRK/Quw xNSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlinMvaz1x3V44fFAMgC3Lgf/GWtB8KysKVRK43ugZ8L97LyQPNG/CjTbYpMU+pa6SjMa40 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.67.4.231 with SMTP id ch7mr308398pad.46.1409663051161; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <047d7b15fb436ae8fc050214c19e@google.com> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:04:11 +0000 Subject: Important information for your website:Freebsd.org:ZS From: Jay Vincent To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:28:59 -0000 Hi Freebsd.org Team, I trust you are doing splendidly. I have gone through your website and I comprehend that it's well built, but can be improved in several ways to get better sales and revenue from the site. If you would like me to send you a complete list of upgrades and improvements we could do to your site then kindly let me know so that I can send you the brief quotation for your website. After in-depth research about your website and analyzing the targeted market for your business to prevail, we also execute effective online marketing campaigns by targeting not only local markets but also provincial and international markets as well. However you will be getting *all-in-one services* when contacting us. Search engine optimization is one of the best ways to create targeted traffic for your website. Without traffic, you don't have anybody visiting your site to turn into buyers. It's only search engine tricks that need to keep changing when the ranking algorithm changes. We will help you to increase your visibility in all the major search engines by *improving keyword rankings* and *boosting your real time website traffic* with lots of back links which are always done through White Hat techniques. Indeed you position your website properly to be found at the most critical points in the buying process or when people need your site. Our aim is to provide you with complete web marketing solutions to help your website rank high on the search engines. Before moving on further, we will have a consultation phase where we will discuss what your website goals are and how we can accomplish them. In addition, we may ask you certain questions that may be concerning on the website structure and strategic foundation for your social media marketing. Should you have any questions, please let us know. To improve the search engine visibility of your website, we look forward to hearing from you after you have had time to read our proposal. Best Regards, *Jay Vincent* Sales Advisor Skype: webmarketing.sales From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 14:29:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292EBA1C; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9561E1D; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ex7so7995186wid.7 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:29:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:message-id:date :cc:mime-version; bh=/YPP5nPS+XShqUujF3PyUf1BZwGr2ZfYPmYwIhbxvLQ=; b=r5PPVo8gbSSdb7Xzu2rM2eLLYAeAPcexFeHVwhw89KFaIrFnmJqxuwnCFhD8FfX3qc wXpmzdst0TkxK3OYFmSGAZqJyEGpzJu8oN7xXuFaPgtRzXFZKMK/cqHb8XXc5rcg5cgK T+ZimoeED1aRpdD5qegrmBdy7RWFnBPEJ1ltPbFFP+PlZWhJtZ1P1FCzKz2xgTCAY14U CfDk/GRt7dJOoIRtXlaH3IlzMIf4q8Yq2FcU4Uwc9yJoQRN8CevFcT1uHYASam/keyUR 9ROuiTET97EiE59AWOADV+cHYUZq4aQ5L1VxITU9U6yaWmWgSZI4UV7An/YQIZGrKLtq 6Y0w== X-Received: by 10.194.8.168 with SMTP id s8mr3101568wja.129.1409668194145; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.2] ([62.219.134.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm35607455wiw.6.2014.09.02.07.29.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Using a USB modem. From: atar Message-Id: Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:29:27 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10B500) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:29:57 -0000 Hi there! I've a ZTE USB modem and I want to use it with FreeBSD. I've attached it to o= ne of the USB slots on my PC and run the "ls -lh /dev/" command to see what'= s going on. I've saw that two modem devices have been created in the 'dialup= ' group: cuau0 and cuau1. My question is why were two devices nodes created instead of one and how sho= uld I know which of them I need to use? Regards, Atar.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 14:42:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3FBEB73; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAADE103F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s82EgnPx021214; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:42:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5405D76A.3060400@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:42:50 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: atar Subject: Re: Using a USB modem. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:42:54 -0000 On 9/2/2014 10:29 AM, atar wrote: > > I've a ZTE USB modem and I want to use it with FreeBSD. I've attached it to one of the USB slots on my PC and run the "ls -lh /dev/" command to see what's going on. I've saw that two modem devices have been created in the 'dialup' group: cuau0 and cuau1. > > My question is why were two devices nodes created instead of one and how should I know which of them I need to use? Typically, they will show up as /dev/cuaUx or /dev/cuaUx.x (note the capital U). Make sure you have the u3g driver loaded as well. (kldload u3g). Also, some ZTE sticks need to be put in "modem mode". This can often be done by sending the eject command to its "cdrom" if its listed as pass0, try the command camcontrol eject pass0 ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 15:49:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA14FB39 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 921041AB6 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-135.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s82Fn9XD028668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:49:10 -0500 Message-ID: <5405E86C.2010009@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:55:24 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: persisting pkg questions .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:49:17 -0000 .... I am still having problems getting pkg to upgrade as I think it should based on my read of the man page: [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_4,2) gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.52,1) libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has 2.21.15_3) xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has 1.12.4_8,1) [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:17am] 550 % 1st command seems to show some pkg's w/ upgrades available, but the 'pkg upgrade' command does nothing .... The man page pretty explicitly implies that the 'pkg upgrade' command will upgrade anything needing upgrading. Am I supposed to list the pkg's returned by the 1st command (*not at all* intuitive, nor obvious from man page, which seems to imply the opposite) ? Explicitly fetch them myself (also *not* intuitive, not implied in man page) ? pkg bug ? pilot error ? TIA for any help .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 17:14:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E367A4BA for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CC9187B for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ty20so8303627lab.11 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:14:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uqVkfSLJglmxcEFoJFEphogOg0wwiAyW6NrdDHcOTXo=; b=H7tiKIhz7VU9HpfCzarNd3iodrmgsuvaXqXxHPr0ibNO9IRf2iJaHXFljZOagM3qjq aiplzGs3RRrHbCEZds2KZRARozARrCR0UXIA7PgUyWPumxnCVmhb3CUcEVD3MDIFO20b f/23D1oGgi9TINU8oe2yjCK26v/pM/aJwHJF8lt6iEe4fTionZsSSXCIcT7RONMK+1T6 c7R8CqGSaDBH3H91sW1NrBKc4h9IVdxUhf+Td+4zLA9lcUFtMaPXA562aUZgpyiTOPHd SWPgXWybr+OUKNiN09liTE8vNkYd8OIkrPWraObVuko0GhL0p9ZAs5W51rmUkMlRztVo k6og== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlw+mszi0Ink3Nj4zRyuyR48t+djBS446Jkgo7uv49htxORjmQUcAi7nNQTRlMMVk4r0Ejg MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.20.41 with SMTP id k9mr35661719lae.57.1409676445052; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.24.9 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:47:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [70.209.203.74] Received: by 10.25.24.9 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:47:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5405E86C.2010009@hiwaay.net> References: <5405E86C.2010009@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:47:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... From: "Brian W." To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:14:35 -0000 Did you pkg update first? On Sep 2, 2014 8:49 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > > > .... I am still having problems getting pkg to upgrade as I think it > should based on my read of the man page: > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= > curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) > dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_4,2) > gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) > libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) > libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.52,1) > libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) > pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) > portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) > readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has 2.21.15_3) > xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has > 1.12.4_8,1) > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 > linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat > linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: > x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig > linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs > opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Your packages are up to date. > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:17am] 550 % > > > > 1st command seems to show some pkg's w/ upgrades available, but the 'pkg > upgrade' command does nothing .... The man page pretty explicitly implies > that the 'pkg upgrade' command will upgrade anything needing upgrading. Am > I supposed to list the pkg's returned by the 1st command (*not at all* > intuitive, nor obvious from man page, which seems to imply the opposite) ? > Explicitly fetch them myself (also *not* intuitive, not implied in man > page) ? pkg bug ? pilot error ? TIA for any help .... > > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 17:18:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7157660 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D10F18B1 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n15so8091401lbi.12 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Y3UG/maksUJmL91EeyYLzrsrC/0F82WjNPJlTqY3W2E=; b=ERzbUhpfGYBvBmziaNa9ULgHjcsGfOs9s4VxymkFCT+rIm6U7lThPJkSU3hIg0otKu 6eOmTHcWWJI4CWf2zCnvlsBsvkL09LsRsRL5UKV5VdbxoJLwKFncF5UD7gO2RrCG/U8i OpKe28HKt085NpbBOa95ud9X0cu7fiDse/t2JxzyCA3TXxehQciKqrmuyklSZjHsOK5V aKSxoWNihKj+5u5nsxH/xu8HHdYRYiO26KlosEu6TRHVRQ/rA/yAq4PifPkgb513aHfN p8bRc2AxeKGrG3/eVhVGbE4iuaL9jBEugQ37W2/GTTOZZ15dR0iACh9woVoIrc7BaCUf YJvw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmAUuCAVha9zEy/Ftv6VSWjfV6uLqgRn++hLfYKQkRZOxp3BGXKKLWHB/XuT4cLtRpVHD8/ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.6.40 with SMTP id x8mr35676360lax.18.1409678294930; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.24.9 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:18:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [140.239.2.163] In-Reply-To: References: <5405E86C.2010009@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:18:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... From: "Brian W." To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:18:24 -0000 That reply was erroneous, I have been spending too much time in front of Linux boxes lately.. On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Brian W. wrote: > Did you pkg update first? > On Sep 2, 2014 8:49 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > >> >> >> .... I am still having problems getting pkg to upgrade as I think it >> should based on my read of the man page: >> >> >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= >> curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) >> dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has >> 9.1.7_4,2) >> gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has >> 2.24.22_4) >> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) >> libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.52,1) >> libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) >> pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) >> portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) >> readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) >> xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has >> 2.21.15_3) >> xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has >> 1.12.4_8,1) >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 >> linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat >> linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: >> x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig >> linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs >> opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >> Your packages are up to date. >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:17am] 550 % >> >> >> >> 1st command seems to show some pkg's w/ upgrades available, but the 'pkg >> upgrade' command does nothing .... The man page pretty explicitly implies >> that the 'pkg upgrade' command will upgrade anything needing upgrading. Am >> I supposed to list the pkg's returned by the 1st command (*not at all* >> intuitive, nor obvious from man page, which seems to imply the opposite) ? >> Explicitly fetch them myself (also *not* intuitive, not implied in man >> page) ? pkg bug ? pilot error ? TIA for any help .... >> >> >> >> -- >> >> William A. Mahaffey III >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war >> ever devised by man." >> -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 17:53:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85472E1D for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com (mail-lb0-f178.google.com [209.85.217.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA2D1CB0 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id v6so8025267lbi.37 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:53:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/ldntpzqXTuWnGDivAfwn9FFGyas9RHoUrIo0GhkQCA=; b=CPOKcEne/Y8wZOJrNBHhzI0Z7MJg/D6GPiXVOzfAdkQNdGlnEJ8gZBDBHloTIvRa2r NEDyl08JQhgf4w8zJazy0zgIn1L+V0xGi7Q99kCmozo9XIWdVip8SRuVu1uND59R8F+K +Z5JFoTj5wj8vV4gnGS8gOy6PGZAY+r5qJrPRDF3M5n9Ft/yCyBEok0/y3+bR2h+gDaW ieE8UP8W50OJ4HFUrJSWzVwOjfVIcIta23eJDFiDMf+Fowr7tgfjNqhpw4M+1CpcACa4 6gvSWGGyCxn+lwF+/AGNKA90jIkxvQUvkVHkKELys8zmOpQXufgNnZILdcZBnuIWqAmF C7dg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOgM8gcAnh0ngTTKL2+C3H0Khjw1uIaf2qHiFjRiZUIpoIFF5azrCcTXCurMBY9vcD0+qB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.149.72 with SMTP id ty8mr34411776lbb.15.1409679898128; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.24.9 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:44:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [140.239.2.163] In-Reply-To: References: <5405E86C.2010009@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:44:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... From: "Brian W." To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:53:09 -0000 We have now what we also used to have before; not all packages are built in the current version. In the pre pkgng days I used to portupgrade -aP. What I did to solve this now, because I just saw it as well, was a portupgrade -a. Brian On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Brian W. wrote: > That reply was erroneous, I have been spending too much time in front of > Linux boxes lately.. > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Brian W. wrote: > >> Did you pkg update first? >> On Sep 2, 2014 8:49 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> .... I am still having problems getting pkg to upgrade as I think it >>> should based on my read of the man page: >>> >>> >>> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= >>> curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has >>> 7.37.1_3) >>> dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has >>> 9.1.7_4,2) >>> gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has >>> 2.24.22_4) >>> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) >>> libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has >>> 2.4.52,1) >>> libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) >>> pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has >>> 1.34.1_7) >>> portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) >>> readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) >>> xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has >>> 2.21.15_3) >>> xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has >>> 1.12.4_8,1) >>> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>> db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 >>> linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat >>> linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: >>> x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig >>> linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs >>> opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins >>> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>> Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% >>> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >>> Your packages are up to date. >>> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:17am] 550 % >>> >>> >>> >>> 1st command seems to show some pkg's w/ upgrades available, but the 'pkg >>> upgrade' command does nothing .... The man page pretty explicitly implies >>> that the 'pkg upgrade' command will upgrade anything needing upgrading. Am >>> I supposed to list the pkg's returned by the 1st command (*not at all* >>> intuitive, nor obvious from man page, which seems to imply the opposite) ? >>> Explicitly fetch them myself (also *not* intuitive, not implied in man >>> page) ? pkg bug ? pilot error ? TIA for any help .... >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> William A. Mahaffey III >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war >>> ever devised by man." >>> -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 19:11:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76FFCED for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81CEB173A for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-135.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s82JBK5t024821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:11:21 -0500 Message-ID: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:17:35 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <5405E86C.2010009@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:11:23 -0000 On 09/02/14 11:47, Brian W. wrote: > > Did you pkg update first? > > On Sep 2, 2014 8:49 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" > wrote: > > > > .... I am still having problems getting pkg to upgrade as I think > it should based on my read of the man page: > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= > curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has > 7.37.1_3) > dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has > 9.1.7_4,2) > gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has > 2.24.22_4) > libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has > 9.1.7_1) > libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has > 2.4.52,1) > libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has > 0.1.6_1) > pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has > 1.34.1_7) > portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has > 3.17.7) > readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has > 6.3.8) > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has > 2.21.15_3) > xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has > 1.12.4_8,1) > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 > linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: > textproc/linux-f10-expat > linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: > x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig > linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: > x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs > opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: > www/opera-linuxplugins > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Your packages are up to date. > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:17am] 550 % > > > > 1st command seems to show some pkg's w/ upgrades available, but > the 'pkg upgrade' command does nothing .... The man page pretty > explicitly implies that the 'pkg upgrade' command will upgrade > anything needing upgrading. Am I supposed to list the pkg's > returned by the 1st command (*not at all* intuitive, nor obvious > from man page, which seems to imply the opposite) ? Explicitly > fetch them myself (also *not* intuitive, not implied in man page) > ? pkg bug ? pilot error ? TIA for any help .... > > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > yes, see below (I didn't post it earlier because I didn't think it mattered, certainly from my read of the man page) : [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:44:17am] 546 % pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... Fetching meta.txz: 100% 964 B 1.0k/s 00:01 Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 409.1k/s 00:05 Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 355.0k/s 00:15 Processing new repository entries: 100% FreeBSD repository update completed. 23519 packages processed: 0 updated, 0 removed and 23519 added. whew !!!! that took (26.547 cpu + 1.978 sys) sec., 0:49.82 elapsed time tot, 57.2% CPU efficiency (208 text, 2553 data, 46448 max) KB, (0+1124) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_4,2) gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.52,1) libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has 2.21.15_3) xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has 1.12.4_8,1) [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:17am] 550 % -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 19:22:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B80232D for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1632D186F for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 288738C10955; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:22:42 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Warren Block Subject: Re: controlled environment for regular expressions? Message-ID: <20140902192242.GB34737@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20140901204147.GA53086@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140902061721.GA90979@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:22:43 -0000 --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 07:11:45AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, David Benfell wrote: >=20 > > I've been pondering how to respond to this. It's all deeply buried in > > how I sort email, which is with my own mail delivery agent written in > > perl. > > > > The MDA provides the option to call an external program, in this case, > > grep, and sort or not sort a message into the associated Maildir based > > on the exit code. > > > > One of these instances is where I search the email headers with: > > > > /usr/bin/grep "^Subject: Cron"' >=20 > There is an extra single quote at the end of that line. Oops. An artifact from the configuration. I don't have the sorting hard-coded into the MDA. It works from a configuration file. The original idea was that I should be able to sort email based on the =66rom address or certain other addresses in the email headers. I do this with simple lists in text files. But sometimes I need to do something different--and I still don't want to hard code that into the program. Hence, grep. >=20 > > From the command line, it matches every time on this header: > > > > Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/pycardsyncer > > > > and properly sorts the message. > > > > But when this MDA is called either from a cron job or with postfix's > > delivery instruction, it now fails every time. >=20 > To see if the problem is with cron, I'd add a test cron job that just=20 > manually runs the test: >=20 > echo "Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/pycardsyncer" | /usr/bi= n/grep -q "^Subject: Cron" && echo "matched" >=20 > If that works, It did. > it's not a problem with cron or grep, and I'd proceed to=20 > do that same test but piping the actual test message in another cron=20 > job. This worked as well. That suggests it's my MDA that's broken, somehow, under cron but not =66rom the terminal. This is very bad news. And I haven't a clue why that might be. > Maybe also piping it to a file to see if it is being changed=20 > somehow in terms of whitespace or unescaped characters. >=20 > > I haven't modified this MDA in a while. I wrote it years ago. The last > > change I made to the delivery script was in 2011. I've been using it > > continuously for probably over a decade. >=20 > I would still suspect underlying things. >=20 > Other thoughts: >=20 > If the MDA is Perl, why use grep? See above. Using grep is meant to be the exceptional case. Getting the program to allow for perl regular expressions would be an exercise I'm just not able to take on at the moment. > Also: > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/maildrop.html Basically, maildrop and procmail are too hung up on solving problems with regular expressions. With the wildly disparate email addresses I'm dealing with--I receive newsletters from hundreds of news organizations--that would rapidly become unwieldy. To make them work, I'd have to resubscribe using the plus hack (assuming that even works). I'd rather my MDA just worked as it has for over a decade. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUBhkCAAoJEBV64x4SNmAroHIP/0aei7OEfXiR0D0dgC5I2hva MsYMhZaI2FioxVtWBKIL0M8/KD+sd0wiH6emLwD80LO3a1ZFo+4LdY/MYuY5L3BB 7VmRY7FLDjOGyqFZe0mjjtkPrs0U80a2fjWCKmeOZSkAcybcSE8VtgwewWduzlia vRf7BdNushZ7QRnfkpoIUNHhzr+zNt5m+2OIatTDu4kpkoZpXTxrFto6Sw2gF2PG OGdwTf5QjJ+HP1BVgIznKgfAV3EanRrmV5U5U0BtEFWxavA6kfbi8EOWlrn1yuOc YAFRFPpCV9KtmlyT+RxWse6ibLi1Y9/6tRT4fpalUW/jGLAPBBN1EZWrvV6KoY5K T9EGWDouj7EZnmcQsWYM1cXa1Yuoc3+BOth0a1glVQPZKNvHWufoGZfuc2SX8cai LQMz84JjCvrVZ6eaRBktokmBBoTh1fKnCqhVft5IGN52UNqOmhMb5faUqINNXJj6 p99BFGYjxbIO2IPTiB6kmvTuIniTrV1Z4r4yVdme1RdcKsuVm2emFtIuraal/9Rv z0H+k2MwX0h08oZd9Y3ghnxasU5Dx7FW7biSXqssc/QLsBGCdLSkPJ1+8+ueErif N3F0B0bJViFuAxWP4jEnAl4sbga6ajkxY7vcv0T4gBcxYhF13QU0p9rkq1HNG15N W8Gzy789Pc/R1MdIUhCi =viZY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 19:25:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3C5143C; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379971899; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q59so7461234wes.17 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:25:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:references:from :in-reply-to:message-id:date:cc:to:mime-version; bh=fvwrvexPZbT3DSrnLLAQe91cQkcsqU64f5FprIGoC8s=; b=xezCTRzj29GtriMadM8It6bQiE11Zxo+WOLGE+phv7xcLTlrJYTLjwOhz/ChuJ0wTv HKVRDCbsbrvHuBnQIUdUeGK94/vqVZWBuLebOBpidSA79kSwR9xAgh0+PCi63g34cgce J+zmBWPMk8lxWpcRWibPZGi6L3/2YT91rBlcigkL8Lgcu/g81iQDK/pTlU5qQ4aAZ2l4 Y5cHiS5iPH7QXVt46qbSrowKNlqDO5b0UBHo+/ujTwBiMDui7J/oHspqPzGfAugQccWj yEhPJqi3B+31r6LJzJUQcvnpMcvllcVJykriEatDjFyBr/bXhKvnUUP0RlJ7ry5DoMrZ WM5g== X-Received: by 10.180.20.40 with SMTP id k8mr30997710wie.38.1409685915514; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.7] (bzq-79-182-135-11.red.bezeqint.net. [79.182.135.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bt9sm11352534wjc.44.2014.09.02.12.25.13 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Using a USB modem. References: <5405D76A.3060400@sentex.net> From: atar In-Reply-To: <5405D76A.3060400@sentex.net> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:59:24 +0300 To: Mike Tancsa Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10B500) Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:25:17 -0000 Thanks you for your kind support. > Typically, they will show up as /dev/cuaUx or /dev/cuaUx.x (note the capit= al U). That's interesting since in the output of 'ls -lh /dev' in my PC it appears w= ith no capital 'U'. In addition, I've tried to initialize the both devices with 'ppp' but when I= tried to enter the 'term' command, ppp hangs up and don't give me an option= to send to the modem commands. Any idea what's the problem? Regards, Atar. > On 9/2/2014 10:29 AM, atar wrote: >>=20 >> I've a ZTE USB modem and I want to use it with FreeBSD. I've attached it t= o one of the USB slots on my PC and run the "ls -lh /dev/" command to see wh= at's going on. I've saw that two modem devices have been created in the 'dia= lup' group: cuau0 and cuau1. >>=20 >> My question is why were two devices nodes created instead of one and how s= hould I know which of them I need to use? >=20 > Typically, they will show up as /dev/cuaUx or /dev/cuaUx.x (note the capit= al U). Make sure you have the u3g driver loaded as well. (kldload u3g). Al= so, some ZTE sticks need to be put in "modem mode". This can often be done b= y sending the eject command to its "cdrom" >=20 > if its listed as pass0, try the command > camcontrol eject pass0 >=20 > ---Mike >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 20:16:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4B86D6; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A94DF1DC3; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s82KGLP8078753; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:16:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <54062596.30801@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:16:22 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: atar Subject: Re: Using a USB modem. References: <5405D76A.3060400@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:16:27 -0000 On 9/2/2014 2:59 PM, atar wrote: >> Typically, they will show up as /dev/cuaUx or /dev/cuaUx.x (note the capital U). > > That's interesting since in the output of 'ls -lh /dev' in my PC it appears with no capital 'U'. Thats your onboard serial ports (uart0 and uart1). > > In addition, I've tried to initialize the both devices with 'ppp' but when I tried to enter the 'term' command, ppp hangs up and don't give me an option to send to the modem commands. Any idea what's the problem? Did you load the driver (kldload u3g) ? what is the output of usbconfig it should show something like # usbconfig ugen0.1: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen1.1: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen1.2: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON ugen1.4: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON note the #s for the device. On mine, it shows 1.4. So do the matching command for yours so it provides the following output usbconfig -d 1.4 dump_device_desc ugen1.4: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON bLength = 0x0012 bDescriptorType = 0x0001 bcdUSB = 0x0200 bDeviceClass = 0x0000 bDeviceSubClass = 0x0000 bDeviceProtocol = 0x0000 bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x0040 idVendor = 0x19d2 idProduct = 0x0031 bcdDevice = 0x0000 iManufacturer = 0x0002 iProduct = 0x0001 iSerialNumber = 0x0003 <1234567890ABCDEF> bNumConfigurations = 0x0001 Then provide the output of # sysctl -a dev.u3g ---Mike > > Regards, > > Atar. > >> On 9/2/2014 10:29 AM, atar wrote: >>> >>> I've a ZTE USB modem and I want to use it with FreeBSD. I've attached it to one of the USB slots on my PC and run the "ls -lh /dev/" command to see what's going on. I've saw that two modem devices have been created in the 'dialup' group: cuau0 and cuau1. >>> >>> My question is why were two devices nodes created instead of one and how should I know which of them I need to use? >> >> Typically, they will show up as /dev/cuaUx or /dev/cuaUx.x (note the capital U). Make sure you have the u3g driver loaded as well. (kldload u3g). Also, some ZTE sticks need to be put in "modem mode". This can often be done by sending the eject command to its "cdrom" >> >> if its listed as pass0, try the command >> camcontrol eject pass0 >> >> ---Mike >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------- >> Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 >> Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net >> Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net >> Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > > -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 20:57:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDA8393 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp23.services.sfr.fr (smtp23.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780871280 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2309.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 62FF470000BE for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:50:34 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (136.118.14.109.rev.sfr.net [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2309.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3127670000B3 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:50:34 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20140902205034201.3127670000B3@msfrf2309.sfr.fr Message-ID: <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:50:24 +0200 From: Juanitou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:57:42 -0000 > [root at kabini1 , /etc, 10:44:17am] 546 % pkg update > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > Fetching meta.txz: 100% 964 B 1.0k/s 00:01 > Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 409.1k/s 00:05 > Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 355.0k/s 00:15 > Processing new repository entries: 100% > FreeBSD repository update completed. 23519 packages processed: > 0 updated, 0 removed and 23519 added. > whew !!!! that took (26.547 cpu + 1.978 sys) sec., 0:49.82 elapsed > time tot, 57.2% CPU efficiency > (208 text, 2553 data, 46448 max) KB, (0+1124) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps > [root at kabini1 , /etc, 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= > curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) > dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_4,2) > gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) > libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) > libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.52,1) > libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) > pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) > portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) > readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has 2.21.15_3) > xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has 1.12.4_8,1) > [root at kabini1 , /etc, 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 > linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat > linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: > x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig > linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs > opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins > [root at kabini1 , /etc, 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Your packages are up to date. I guess you are mixing ports and packages. On the one hand, your ports tree has been updated (portsnap fetch update?), and so your package INDEX. On the other hand, the pkg repositories have not been updated yet with the new versions of these ports. If these assumptions are true, the above results are normal. I hope it helps, Juan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 21:27:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE75AAEB for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp23.services.sfr.fr (smtp23.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702EC15D0 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2318.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 28DD87000072 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 23:22:09 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (136.118.14.109.rev.sfr.net [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2318.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D72687000054 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 23:22:08 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20140902212208881.D72687000054@msfrf2318.sfr.fr Message-ID: <540634F6.6040308@club-internet.fr> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:21:58 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 21:27:41 -0000 El 02/09/2014 22:50, Juanitou escribió: >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:44:17am] 546 % pkg update >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> Fetching meta.txz: 100% 964 B 1.0k/s 00:01 >> Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 409.1k/s 00:05 >> Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 355.0k/s 00:15 >> Processing new repository entries: 100% >> FreeBSD repository update completed. 23519 packages processed: >> 0 updated, 0 removed and 23519 added. >> whew !!!! that took (26.547 cpu + 1.978 sys) sec., 0:49.82 elapsed >> time tot, 57.2% CPU efficiency >> (208 text, 2553 data, 46448 max) KB, (0+1124) io, 0 pfs + 0 >> swaps >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= >> curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has >> 7.37.1_3) >> dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has >> 9.1.7_4,2) >> gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has >> 2.24.22_4) >> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7_1) >> libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has >> 2.4.52,1) >> libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) >> pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has >> 1.34.1_7) >> portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) >> readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) >> xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has >> 2.21.15_3) >> xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has >> 1.12.4_8,1) >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 >> linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat >> linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: >> x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig >> linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs >> opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >> Your packages are up to date. Also, I have just seen that you have the new Xorg enabled (look at the dri and libGL versions) but you seem to have not configured the recent new_xorg package repository. If you wish to use packages instead of ports you should enable it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 22:37:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85745401 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF2C1E59 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id mNd21o002516WCc01Nd33J; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:37:03 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fsVSZTIf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=OOzCJWdBeL0A:10 a=C3HNYFm91mYA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=Q4HbV60tK_UD7cuJdC0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XOwhB-000BWc-Ny for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:37:02 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4449233.ee8yzlM0pQ@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Package repository priorities Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:37:11 -0000 I'm trying to use poudriere to maintain packages which need to be built with non-default options. I can install packages from my repository with the -r option but it looks like I'll have problems when I next need to run pkg upgrade because there doesn't seem to be a way to ensure that my repository will automaticallytake precedence over the remote FreeBSD repository for the packages I've built. According to pkg-repository(5) I should follow the following steps pkg install -r repo-a example-1.0.0 and then to make updates to that package ``sticky'' to the same reposi-tory, add an annotation to the package: pkg annotate -A example repository repo-a Things seem to have changed a bit since thw man page was created in September last year because I see that packages are now automatically annotated with the repository name: curlew:/root# uname -a FreeBSD curlew.lan 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 curlew:/root# pkg info pkg exim-sa-exim mod_php5 pkg-1.3.7 exim-sa-exim-4.84+4.2_1 Mod_php5-5.4.32,1 Exim-sa-exim and mod_php5 came from my repository and this shows up without me setting any annotation: curlew:/var/log# pkg query "%n %At %Av" exim-sa-exim mod_php5 | grep repository exim-sa-exim repository poudriere mod_php5 repository poudriere But attempts to upgrade them are inconsistent in the choice of repository curlew:/root# pkg upgrade -f exim-sa-exim mod_php5 Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. Updating poudriere repository catalogue... poudriere repository is up-to-date. Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The following 2 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be REINSTALLED: exim-sa-exim-4.84+4.2_1 [FreeBSD] mod_php5-5.4.32,1 [poudriere] The output from "pkg -vv" lists repositories in the following order: FreeBSD, poudriere, FreeBSD_new_xorg Is there any way I can ensure that pkg upgrade will use the "right" repository for each package or will I need to manually force an upgrade for just my modified packages first with the -r option before doing a bulk upgrade? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 03:17:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DAFB70 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 03:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8AAC1DAC for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 03:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-201.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s833HKF0028154 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:17:21 -0500 Message-ID: <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:23:35 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:17:23 -0000 On 09/02/14 15:50, Juanitou wrote: >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:44:17am] 546 % pkg update >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> Fetching meta.txz: 100% 964 B 1.0k/s 00:01 >> Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 409.1k/s 00:05 >> Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 355.0k/s 00:15 >> Processing new repository entries: 100% >> FreeBSD repository update completed. 23519 packages processed: >> 0 updated, 0 removed and 23519 added. >> whew !!!! that took (26.547 cpu + 1.978 sys) sec., 0:49.82 elapsed >> time tot, 57.2% CPU efficiency >> (208 text, 2553 data, 46448 max) KB, (0+1124) io, 0 pfs + 0 >> swaps >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= >> curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has >> 7.37.1_3) >> dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has >> 9.1.7_4,2) >> gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has >> 2.24.22_4) >> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has >> 9.1.7_1) >> libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has >> 2.4.52,1) >> libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has >> 0.1.6_1) >> pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has >> 1.34.1_7) >> portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) >> readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) >> xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has >> 2.21.15_3) >> xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has >> 1.12.4_8,1) >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 >> linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: >> textproc/linux-f10-expat >> linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: >> x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig >> linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs >> opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins >> [root at kabini1 >> , /etc, >> 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >> Your packages are up to date. > I guess you are mixing ports and packages. On the one hand, your ports > tree has been updated (portsnap fetch update?), and so your package > INDEX. On the other hand, the pkg repositories have not been updated > yet with the new versions of these ports. If these assumptions are > true, the above results are normal. > > I hope it helps, > Juan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I am using pkg whenever possible, in preference to ports, however, there are a few things that require ports (flash plugin for browsers, for example) .... seems unavoidable. Is there a way to work around this issue ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 03:20:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A321DC49 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 03:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E65C1DE4 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 03:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-201.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s833K8lA029237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:20:09 -0500 Message-ID: <54068A5F.2090704@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:26:23 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540634F6.6040308@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <540634F6.6040308@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:20:10 -0000 On 09/02/14 16:21, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: > El 02/09/2014 22:50, Juanitou escribió: >>> [root at kabini1 >>> , /etc, >>> 10:44:17am] 546 % pkg update >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> Fetching meta.txz: 100% 964 B 1.0k/s 00:01 >>> Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 409.1k/s 00:05 >>> Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 355.0k/s 00:15 >>> Processing new repository entries: 100% >>> FreeBSD repository update completed. 23519 packages processed: >>> 0 updated, 0 removed and 23519 added. >>> whew !!!! that took (26.547 cpu + 1.978 sys) sec., 0:49.82 elapsed >>> time tot, 57.2% CPU efficiency >>> (208 text, 2553 data, 46448 max) KB, (0+1124) io, 0 pfs + 0 >>> swaps >>> [root at kabini1 >>> , /etc, >>> 10:45:18am] 547 % pkg version -vIL= >>> curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has >>> 7.37.1_3) >>> dri-7.6.1_4,2 < needs updating (index has >>> 9.1.7_4,2) >>> gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has >>> 2.24.22_4) >>> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has >>> 9.1.7_1) >>> libdrm-2.4.17_1,1 < needs updating (index has >>> 2.4.52,1) >>> libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has >>> 0.1.6_1) >>> pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has >>> 1.34.1_7) >>> portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has >>> 3.17.7) >>> readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) >>> xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_8 < needs updating (index has >>> 2.21.15_3) >>> xorg-server-1.7.7_13,1 < needs updating (index has >>> 1.12.4_8,1) >>> [root at kabini1 >>> , /etc, >>> 10:45:30am] 548 % pkg version -vRL= >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>> db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 >>> linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: >>> textproc/linux-f10-expat >>> linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: >>> x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig >>> linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: >>> x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs >>> opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins >>> [root at kabini1 >>> , /etc, >>> 10:45:43am] 549 % pkg upgrade >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>> Checking for upgrades (256 candidates): 100% >>> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >>> Your packages are up to date. > > Also, I have just seen that you have the new Xorg enabled (look at the > dri and libGL versions) but you seem to have not configured the recent > new_xorg package repository. If you wish to use packages instead of > ports you should enable it. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Very well, how do I go about doing that ? Remember, noob, noob, noob :-) !!!! Thx & TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 07:12:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00A25D32 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B233B1945 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2208.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2B84D7000185 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:12:01 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (136.118.14.109.rev.sfr.net [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2208.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ECD9A700007C for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:12:00 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20140903071200970.ECD9A700007C@msfrf2208.sfr.fr Message-ID: <5406BF37.3090902@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:11:51 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540634F6.6040308@club-internet.fr> <54068A5F.2090704@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54068A5F.2090704@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:12:04 -0000 >> Also, I have just seen that you have the new Xorg enabled (look at the >> dri and libGL versions) but you seem to have not configured the recent >> new_xorg package repository. If you wish to use packages instead of >> ports you should enable it. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > Very well, how do I go about doing that ? Remember, noob, noob, noob :-) > !!!! Thx & TIA .... Just use Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22new_xorg%22+%22freebsd%22+%22repository%22 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 07:12:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A7B9DCB for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6A71959 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2208.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D934F7000195 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:06:14 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (136.118.14.109.rev.sfr.net [109.14.118.136]) by msfrf2208.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9BFF57000194 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:06:14 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20140903070614639.9BFF57000194@msfrf2208.sfr.fr Message-ID: <5406BDDC.1080205@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:06:04 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:12:44 -0000 > I am using pkg whenever possible, in preference to ports, however, there > are a few things that require ports (flash plugin for browsers, for > example) .... seems unavoidable. Is there a way to work around this issue ? I don’t see the issue: upgrade your packages when they become available in the official repositories (once a week) and the non-redistributable (i.e. Flash) or customized ports whenever they are updated. If you are careful and know what you are doing, you can mix them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 12:50:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AF1410 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EE03120A for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-34.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s83Corfm017652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:50:54 -0500 Message-ID: <54071024.1010904@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:57:08 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> <5406BDDC.1080205@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <5406BDDC.1080205@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:50:56 -0000 On 09/03/14 02:06, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: >> I am using pkg whenever possible, in preference to ports, however, there >> are a few things that require ports (flash plugin for browsers, for >> example) .... seems unavoidable. Is there a way to work around this >> issue ? > > I don’t see the issue: upgrade your packages when they become > available in the official repositories (once a week) and the > non-redistributable (i.e. Flash) or customized ports whenever they are > updated. If you are careful and know what you are doing, you can mix > them. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > That's what I thought I did (tried to upgrade pkg's Monday), but it didn't work :-) .... Obviously, being a noob to FBSD, I don't know what I am doing, that's why I am posting the question :-) .... Could you be more specific about that weekly upgrade process ? Are there any order-of-op'ns issues, i.e. do pkg's 1st, then ports, for example (I updated ports 1st, then (tried to upgrade) pkg's) .... Any specifics would be helpful .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:01:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6309B670 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D23613BF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-34.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s83D1YGu024766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:01:35 -0500 Message-ID: <540712A5.9070602@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:07:49 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540634F6.6040308@club-internet.fr> <54068A5F.2090704@hiwaay.net> <5406BF37.3090902@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <5406BF37.3090902@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:01:36 -0000 On 09/03/14 02:11, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: >>> Also, I have just seen that you have the new Xorg enabled (look at the >>> dri and libGL versions) but you seem to have not configured the recent >>> new_xorg package repository. If you wish to use packages instead of >>> ports you should enable it. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> Very well, how do I go about doing that ? Remember, noob, noob, noob :-) >> !!!! Thx & TIA .... > > Just use Google: > https://www.google.com/search?q=%22new_xorg%22+%22freebsd%22+%22repository%22 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thx, I will look into this, however it doesn't address my root problem of pkg failing to upgrade when I think I told it to do so & there are upgrades available .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:08:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3941B2F for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 643D314AA for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-19-34.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s83D8LQm032206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:08:21 -0500 Message-ID: <5407143B.1040408@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:14:35 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540689B7.9000006@hiwaay.net> <5406BDDC.1080205@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <5406BDDC.1080205@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:08:22 -0000 On 09/03/14 02:06, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: >> I am using pkg whenever possible, in preference to ports, however, there >> are a few things that require ports (flash plugin for browsers, for >> example) .... seems unavoidable. Is there a way to work around this >> issue ? > > I don’t see the issue: upgrade your packages when they become > available in the official repositories (once a week) and the > non-redistributable (i.e. Flash) or customized ports whenever they are > updated. If you are careful and know what you are doing, you can mix > them. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Good news !!!! I just tried the same 4 'pkg ....' steps I originally posted, *w/o messing w/ ports 1st*, & it is working !!!! *hoooooray* !!!! So, to close the loop here, you need to do any pkg upgrades *before* messing around w/ ports .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:29:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E7DA04 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C1A186F for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [109.15.143.125]) by msfrf2204.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CE4EA700039D for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:28:50 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (125.143.15.109.rev.sfr.net [109.15.143.125]) by msfrf2204.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A57C0700039C for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:28:50 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20140903132850677.A57C0700039C@msfrf2204.sfr.fr Message-ID: <54071788.3000509@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:28:40 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: persisting pkg questions .... References: <540617CF.2080602@hiwaay.net> <54062D90.3020506@club-internet.fr> <540634F6.6040308@club-internet.fr> <54068A5F.2090704@hiwaay.net> <5406BF37.3090902@club-internet.fr> <540712A5.9070602@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <540712A5.9070602@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:29:00 -0000 El 03/09/2014 15:07, William A. Mahaffey III escribió: > > On 09/03/14 02:11, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: >>>> Also, I have just seen that you have the new Xorg enabled (look at the >>>> dri and libGL versions) but you seem to have not configured the recent >>>> new_xorg package repository. If you wish to use packages instead of >>>> ports you should enable it. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> >>> >>> Very well, how do I go about doing that ? Remember, noob, noob, noob :-) >>> !!!! Thx & TIA .... >> >> Just use Google: >> https://www.google.com/search?q=%22new_xorg%22+%22freebsd%22+%22repository%22 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > Thx, I will look into this, however it doesn't address my root problem > of pkg failing to upgrade when I think I told it to do so & there are > upgrades available .... You are maybe wrongly assuming that there are upgraded packages available in the repositories. If, after a "portsnap fecth update", "pkg -vI" shows that some ports have been updated, it does not mean that the packages are already built and available for a "pkg upgrade" operation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:48:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0B1E88 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C241370 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:48:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36597617 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:48:37 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s83EmaXa014689 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:48:37 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s83Ema4k014688 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:48:36 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:48:36 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-ID: <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:48:41 -0000 Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Could you please help me solve the problem with screen or xterm? > > From a FreeBSD 9.3 xterm I ssh to a remote host. The "Home" key sends > (and the remote application receives) "0x1B 0x5B 0x48" (ESC [ H) > which is correct. > > However, if I start screen on the remote host, the application within > the screen's virtual terminal receives "0x1B 0x4F 0x48" for "Home" > which is "ESC O H". It results im the "Home" and key not working > correctly in vim etc. > > The "End" key has the same problem. > I think I have solved the problem by redefining what xterm is sending. In ~/.Xresources XTerm*VT100.translations: #override \n\ Home: string(0x1b) string("[1~") \n \ End: string(0x1b) string("[4~") \n Rather ugly, isn't it. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 15:14:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF15469 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from o47.p4.mailjet.com (o47.p4.mailjet.com [178.33.221.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C299A1889 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:14:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; d=bnc.mailjet.com; i=adam=3Dhiwatt.com@bnc.mailjet.com; s=mailjet; h=message-id:mime-version:content-type:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:precedence:list-id:list-unsubscribe; bh=KDhB/TmVtMyCxNgpen6joPPka3Q=; b=KX+CowWGYhoTHhEiNSydAYLc78qwCeNGQGHyB3Ft2N5m4pMFutf5wtrReye2L+0z8tqruKA0gJDrQrIo6l4DVEN0ZM6DPdZzm+ECnHkhenTywQoBE0ySm1JplmyqMCnXZgNUimCt3fRMS/IaVVlwHcOGU6pzgN8zDitayKtpRPc= Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 From: =?utf-8?Q?Hiwatt_Amplification_LLC?= Reply-To: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Hiwatt_Amplification_-_Special_discounted_rates_available?= Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:05:25 +0100 Precedence: bulk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:14:03 -0000 View online version   This email has been sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org , click here to unsubscribe . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 16:35:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCACD96 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88BF412A0 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s83G9YZ6037526 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:09:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:09:34 -0600 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: convert .mov to .avi? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:09:34 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:35:20 -0000 Can anyone suggest an easy way to convert a .mov file to .avi? I don't have much experience with video and shot some with my camera when on a recent trip. My wife uses windoze to burn dvds and the app she has access to (windows dvd maker) doesn't seem to support .mov files. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 17:28:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E6AFAD for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm16-vm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm16-vm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 018C91A08 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.39.60.165] by nm16.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 17:26:02 -0000 Received: from [216.39.60.250] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 17:26:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.access.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 17:26:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 622591.51194.bm@omp1021.access.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 50002 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Sep 2014 17:26:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=swbell.net; s=s1024; t=1409765162; bh=+qsaVSwWZ2plJOF6aQ9VEWHcSE7jrKm+1bvwzTdYEso=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k5N9CSvChRQ6V17S/PDYtSxZ+OgJo9oLnwczc3MLnrIOrD68FZcvmUzSnI4NwuVH64xtVnFCgEKmHEXYYZUdB6GkhMvloOxV0hxjHOHLUfsbSF3DSlEahU9kOFolf1Y/s7CoFDPtAhQxewoB2Dvqb1cm9tQqXvHOQzRUQ57U01I= X-YMail-OSG: CYGLOcQVM1mwMoGtDDPddBEaFMGrPP5PyLFQlTToE_qOkVr zjx4hTLQAIKgn.sYcSfmTzBdEvZkfKU1v51j1YwqgtSzi8DE3cF0xysUyiO7 8M6xY2TNoHuzBfkJmY_kZs409tbRbwjqGL.dJ67irnnPImWTvP9MJO_nQu93 2uVbWKrdDXpHimYL3yZsD.h4bfHo7v6CmEXrfYjoRCwRC1hN8NM3Yxehyz2M 5rc_5I0nqronavACscxhtfWUM5kwlni6mvOZr6VP5mg_8sQx0dyAIk2EA0PI NibcFs.jDakwC.qJeEL5CqDalTf9TISyuR9UMJoKB1kvJR9ZXxmUhsXMheeW Fj7MPxfesuUNlnb7n.K8nRqeSt3QxfgreKOYe5G9eBvV8plY8kOcPJDw5KAV Pi6bWKj8CrPVM6MUa8HAGnNwCVLOaU_Otak2j1x7laVrIDu8vP3ShOGzQk6z UNIiMIk904A6AH2wicN_mPXvxWQHfrAMXY_CPdhge6mZGwYCk433i0MLboKY gxcAzTASYj89HuLGNbqCdrxEj_1LXJtbxB1QAM_Vu8DUlOnSn67AgkdyId8H .oNcTqzAofw-- Received: from [107.205.224.165] by web185306.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:26:02 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, VXNpbmcgRkJTRC03LjQgYW5kIEFwYWNoZTIyCgpXZSBoYXZlIGEgcHJvdGVjdGVkIChsb2dpbikgdmhvc3Qgd2ViIHNpdGUgcmVxdWlyaW5nIGEgcGFpZCBzdWJzY3JpcHRpb24uIEl0IGNvbnRhaW5zIHZhbHVhYmxlIGludGVsbGVjdHVhbCBtYXRlcmlhbCBhbmQgaXMgaGlnaGx5IGRlc2lyZWQgYXJvdW5kIHRoZSBnbG9iZSAod2UncmUgaW4gMjE4IGNvdW50cmllcykuCgpPdmVyIHRoZSB5ZWFycywgbnVtZXJvdXMgYXR0ZW1wdHMgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1hZGUgdG8gbWFzcyBkb3dubG9hZCB0aGUgZW50aXJlIHMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.201.700 Message-ID: <1409765162.81647.YahooMailNeo@web185306.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:26:02 -0700 From: Jack Stone Reply-To: Jack Stone Subject: Set a limit for web downloads To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:28:41 -0000 Using FBSD-7.4 and Apache22 We have a protected (login) vhost web site requiring a paid subscription. It contains valuable intellectual material and is highly desired around the globe (we're in 218 countries). Over the years, numerous attempts have been made to mass download the entire site when in fact they are supposed to read a single document of interest and can even download it for personal use only. We have used every tool we could find to foil such attempts and such has helped greatly but still not 100% foolproof. We can set traps and snag known mass downloaders and abort such sessions. But that list just keeps on growing. We put most of those tools in the htaccess file specifically designed for that site. Our login system can set the times a specific IP can login within a certain time and that is set to twice in 24 hours. Since most folks are honest, we don't want to punish them unfairly, so we need to focus a tool on offenders. I've looked for some way to set off alerts when a user exceeds a certain download limit, but no dice. Plenty of ways to limit UPloads but not downloads. I've looked at all the htacces tips and nothing there, nor does apache22 contain such a trigger that I can find and limit it to just that vhost. Maybe I've missed something in my search. I've also thought about looking for some script that can be triggered to stop an offending session. I hope the above is stated clearly and if anyone knows of some useful trick, I'd sure appreciate being pointed toward it. (^-^) Best regards, Jack L. Stone From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 18:05:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB1028B6 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.privatdemail.net (mail.privatdemail.net [217.139.17.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445F91DF7 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (mail.privatdemail.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privatdemail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B39258F8 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:58:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=privatdemail.net; h=content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:date:date:message-id; s=pdm200902; t=1409767109; x=1411581510; bh=mcHROsDiyr+dcMUuTP5 MHowJYRSxNnjgmx6u7269UYc=; b=aUbKCegY1SZj3UUxYc2FJGXZbgoYI74EPdA Dl2Uitbl1KDvnux8E1GiiIXri0DprWhFpT+sIwgle+RY9CKi3US8GoXG22jPEmPD l1xcc0uH7R0u+rLqy5sJ9dGEegsYZVh2Y1/28sGjlKAuRDT8FId8jpxqu8qthPZA 7+ApwXXo= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.privatdemail.net Received: from mail.privatdemail.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.privatdemail.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CJKfdWKM3NJ3 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:58:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <540756C3.1060600@privatdemail.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:58:27 +0200 From: bsdaddict User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: convert .mov to .avi? References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:05:46 -0000 On 09/03/2014 18:09, Gary Aitken wrote: > Can anyone suggest an easy way to convert a .mov file to .avi? > I don't have much experience with video and shot some with my camera when on a > recent trip. My wife uses windoze to burn dvds and the app she has access to > (windows dvd maker) doesn't seem to support .mov files. > > Gary > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I suppose "ffmpeg -i path/video1.mov path/movie2.avi" should do it for a fast and simple convertion. Beni. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 19:44:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDCE74AA for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A581ADC for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829DF27716; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s83JiIBV002033; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:44:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:44:18 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: convert .mov to .avi? Message-Id: <20140903214418.fecaa552.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:44:28 -0000 On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:09:34 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > Can anyone suggest an easy way to convert a .mov file to .avi? > I don't have much experience with video and shot some with my camera when on > recent trip. My wife uses windoze to burn dvds and the app she has access to > (windows dvd maker) doesn't seem to support .mov files. Maybe the easy use of ffmpeg will work? % ffmpeg -i in.mov out.avi See "man ffmpeg" for more details. Of course mencoder can do the conversion as well: % mencoder -ovc lavc -oac lavc -o out.avi in.mov Other options might be needed if you need to change quality, resolution, aspect ratio or frame rate, or use a different codec (because AVI is just a container, it can hold different formats for the video and audio information). % mencoder -ovc xvid -oac mp3lame -lameopts abr:br=92 -xvidencopts bitrate=150 -o out.avi in.mov Maybe you can also use the avidemux2_gtk program, but I can't promise it will properly import MOV files... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 19:53:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D413857 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 007BB1BFC for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home (slackbox.xs4all.nl [83.162.243.5]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s83JrHTq055429; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:53:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 73BC7123E1; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:53:17 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: convert .mov to .avi? Message-ID: <20140903195317.GA43988@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: Gary Aitken , FreeBSD Mailing List References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:53:23 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:09:34AM -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > Can anyone suggest an easy way to convert a .mov file to .avi? > I don't have much experience with video and shot some with my camera when= on a=20 > recent trip. My wife uses windoze to burn dvds and the app she has acces= s to > (windows dvd maker) doesn't seem to support .mov files. Assuming you're in North America, Japan or South Korea; ffmpeg -i foo.mov -target ntsc-dvd foo.avi Basically the rest of the world; ffmpeg -i foo.mov -target pal-dvd foo.avi Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUB3GtAAoJEED21dyjijPgyS4P/3pkpXZOocL9qe4yoi29NsEe 3T/9Rl/0j/wz7sbybImP/TH+FanhRILi9hvMz/ruRMSFue0KYdTnCvvicd8LLrIc ruMT73GR7dEeU60ln1grmoBDJbOexRJ09YtPdnK4OY6Om46Ml2BAHxV3tVKQKDPu iRBpmaWM4fcSnlWSCE9QubfNVhSKprg29w7xcFVRmlw/HYwzLL9k1Uwv6Tldcfsl NJ1KRhKEOqgyu+S8dmK4DLT7ASF9hgxJ8X8Y3gOqzc+6XO68PGPZbFURSJ7oJCRL 3I1K0lB8jAHilYZcseKMkkEqQD0s/T0RKj0dHATJOYbAvG7D1VLn+iNuTtFUJ8o9 ivjPGLPa79zyo7O12H9JWLFMLeG+Hxz+840wQfeOcHxkKgLnP9IH4gtrD6GbckqY 92z2bST1AbdfC903BUFNT2fF6YdxNPZlHjXJ0w7O2umv3pZ9OB7unDJFsNPdDOSu udzj3AiT9aJokEbN3Z3zuaQgQ8SOD81Qczokie/COTc3Tq21juFsvdcYFBmU2+zn oBz1sGS+Qses1fl0FVEN3NHjp+JRhOJ6AaS2lDYAK5ZasIRDYwtcDkqvEdk9bwfz WVyzwR8RiCCqIXxNHr9rvet5laSMpx2K7uxZKaIjrLDV13WHLXetiodoYGNiUaQs 4dARDQC4yDhmhuflW39V =zX95 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 20:50:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ACC53BD for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpb.telissant.net (smtpb.telissant.net [199.233.230.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1182138F for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from barrida.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C6D27354 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:50:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpb.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by barrida.3dresearch.com (barrida.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJk9XJECgJ1D for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:49:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (pool-108-3-92-199.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [108.3.92.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65A3427333 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:49:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doncurzio.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 77588A1E34 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:32:56 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: What caused this shutdown/reboot? Message-Id: <20140903163256.5b3ea38927e377dff51d700d@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:50:24 -0000 Hello All, This is a FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r265089 amd64 box. I have these entries in /var/log/messages: Sep 3 15:18:51 dutchman kernel: . Sep 3 15:18:52 dutchman kernel: , 690. Sep 3 15:18:52 dutchman kernel: . Sep 3 15:18:53 dutchman kernel: , 602. Meanwhile, in /var/log/apcupsd.events: 2014-09-03 15:18:52 -0400 apcupsd exiting, signal 15 2014-09-03 15:18:52 -0400 apcupsd shutdown succeeded 2014-09-03 15:23:06 -0400 apcupsd 3.14.10 (13 September 2011) freebsd startup succeeded Do I have a flaky UPS or was this some mysterious process that shut down/rebooted the server? -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 20:55:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118C87AF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173015pub.verizon.net (vms173015pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9F513DB for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([unknown] [96.255.142.83]) by vms173015.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0NBC00CXUFFE1MC0@vms173015.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:54:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (aerie [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s83KsnX9003506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:54:49 -0400 Received: (from tom@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id s83Ksn9e003505; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:54:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:54:49 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: Victor Sudakov Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-id: <20140903205449.GB3259@aerie.jexium-island.net> Reply-to: dickey@his.com References: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:55:17 -0000 --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 09:48:36PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Victor Sudakov wrote: > >=20 > > Could you please help me solve the problem with screen or xterm? > >=20 > > From a FreeBSD 9.3 xterm I ssh to a remote host. The "Home" key sends > > (and the remote application receives) "0x1B 0x5B 0x48" (ESC [ H)=20 > > which is correct. > >=20 > > However, if I start screen on the remote host, the application within > > the screen's virtual terminal receives "0x1B 0x4F 0x48" for "Home" > > which is "ESC O H". It results im the "Home" and key not working > > correctly in vim etc. > >=20 > > The "End" key has the same problem. > >=20 >=20 > I think I have solved the problem by redefining what xterm is sending. > In ~/.Xresources >=20 > XTerm*VT100.translations: #override \n\ > Home: string(0x1b) string("[1~") \n \ > End: string(0x1b) string("[4~") \n >=20 > Rather ugly, isn't it. alternatively: XTerm*VT100.keyboardType: vt220 --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQHgBkACgkQcCNT4PfkjtuKPQCgg/zU7NBbZE6VibcxZmPD1R10 5GwAnAyoiawlvZ+ocoatcOZKGYV7IV3+ =m5SP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:18:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4262B7 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-int-m.obspm.fr (smtp-int-m.obspm.fr [145.238.187.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5E817EA for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by smtp-int-m.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris - 07/2009) with ESMTP id s83LFKIU028580 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:15:22 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:15:20 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Fabian Keil Subject: Re: upgrade to 10 for zfs ? Message-ID: <20140903211520.GA79651@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20140806135423.GC98168@pcjas.obspm.fr> <4b25f41c.28bdc275@fabiankeil.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4b25f41c.28bdc275@fabiankeil.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Miltered: at smtp-int-m.obspm.fr with ID 540784E8.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 540784E8.001/145.238.184.233/pcjas.obspm.fr/pcjas.obspm.fr/ Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:18:20 -0000 Le 07/08/2014 à 11:48:18+0200, Fabian Keil a écrit > Albert Shih wrote: > > > I've (in production) a file server running FreeBSD 9.1-p8. The only thing > > this server does is file-server. Not event through nfs just keep all > > file. > > > > All data file system is using ZFS. I got pretty big (or let's say not > > small) pool (150To) and the server got 48Go of Ram. > > > > Since we using zfs send/received from a another server I got daily a zfs > > core dump. I failed to find which process make this core-dump but it's > > definitvly zfs : > > > > pid 23943 (zfs), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > > pid 70462 (zfs), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > > pid 71042 (zfs), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > > > > I check every zfs file system and don't find any corup data. > > > > One of the zfs sender is running FreeBSD 10 the other linux/Debian. > > > > What's you advise ? Should I upgrade to FreeBSD 10. ? > > Note that receiving zfs processes may also crash on FreeBSD 11: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2014-July/019814.html > > The cause hasn't been analysed yet and from your description > it's not clear to me if it's the same assertion that's being > triggered, but in my case the problem is reproducible, so you > could look for receiving datasets that are missing snapshots > that should have been received already. > > If no snapshots are missing, it's probably an unrelated issue. > > Obviously checking the backtrace wouldn't hurt either. > So after sometime I make the upgrade not to FreeBSD 10 but to FreeBSD 9.3 (it's more easy for me because the server got some jail on FreeBSD 9). Since the upgrade everything is fine no more core dumped. The only point is I lost 2 zfs dataset after the reboot, of course it's the both dataset give me the core dumped. It's not a big deal for me because it's only backup. The point is before I upgrade I check the partition with find/md5, zfs scrub etc... and everything seem fine. Anyway thanks. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mer 3 sep 2014 23:11:54 CEST From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:46:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1283C4B for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brum.ktv.se (brum.ktv.se [91.202.156.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B0B1AE8 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yserver05 (91.214.88.245-public.limmared.com [91.214.88.245] (may be forged)) by brum.ktv.se (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s83H3GIF023721 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:03:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from xae@www.ETS.berkeley.edu) Message-ID: Reply-To: "Itunes" From: "Itunes" To: Subject: Unexpected sign-in attempt Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:30:12 +0530 Organization: Itunes MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:46:21 -0000 Dear , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 12:54 PM, we noticed an attempt to sign in to your Ap= ple account from an unrecognized device in Guadeloupe.=20 If you haven't recently signed in from an unrecognized device and believe= someone may have accessed your account, please visit iTunes to recover y= our account and update your recovery information. Recover iTunes Account Thanks for taking these additional steps to keep your account safe. Apple Store Europe =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 22:18:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A61A658 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420041E1C for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([unknown] [96.255.142.83]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0NBC007QOGI9DC20@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:18:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (aerie [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s83LI9wI003753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:18:09 -0400 Received: (from tom@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id s83LI9X5003751; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:18:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:18:09 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-id: <20140903211809.GA3731@aerie.jexium-island.net> Reply-to: dickey@his.com References: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903205449.GB3259@aerie.jexium-island.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <20140903205449.GB3259@aerie.jexium-island.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:18:39 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:54:49PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: >=20 > alternatively: >=20 > XTerm*keyboardType: vt220 (not in "VT100") --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQHhZEACgkQcCNT4PfkjtuYlwCeI0S5w/N9wdGtCnu+owciyyIX nRsAmwbOMNmzEJKVeMV9VshCm6TWANM1 =vvFf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 23:43:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E118C69 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pop.ncsa.uiuc.edu (pop.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.199.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D7C1A5C for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Envelope-From: za@amazon.com X-Envelope-To: Received: from rimantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu (rimantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.199.3]) by pop.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id s83Dfkm14331 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:41:47 -0500 Received: from yserver05 (auva.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.246.187]) by rimantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.14.6/8.14.4) with SMTP id s83Df8pt019131 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:41:10 -0500 Message-ID: <655D4C11A79F40B78A9FCE6698CAD465@yserver05> Reply-To: "Amazon.co.uk" From: "Amazon.co.uk" To: Subject: =?windows-1251?B?R2V0IHlvdXIgQW1hem9uIIg1MCBWT1VDSEVSIENPREUgdG8gc3BlbmQgb24geW91ciBuZXh0IHB1cmNoYXNl?= Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:07:58 +0530 Organization: Amazon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-Null-Tag: d60b0befe21fd6f11de066e4ae79c055 X-NCSA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact help@ncsa.uiuc.edu for more information, rimantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu X-NCSA-MailScanner-ID: s83Df8pt019131 X-NCSA-MailScanner: Found to be clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:43:01 -0000 You have been chosen by Amazon's Customer Satisfaction Department to take= part in our quick and easy online survey. In return you will receive a =88= 50 VOUCHER CODE to spend on Amazon on your next purchase. =20 In an effort to continually measure the service quality given to you, we'= re asking for valuable feedback on how we are doing and how we can improv= e.=20 Login to your account to take the survey now and receive the =8850 VOUCHE= R CODE within the next 3 days. With the information collected we can deci= de to direct a number of changes to improve and expand our services. The = information you provide us is all non-sensitive and anonymous - No part o= f it is handed down to any third party. Don't miss the chance to change s= omething and claim your fidelity bonus now. =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 02:20:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A845CB for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1861A10 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:20:09 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,462,1406610000"; d="scan'208";a="74468260" Received: from nlpiport02.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.117]) by nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2014 21:15:05 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlVDAHrKB1S9qohu/2dsb2JhbABZgw0gM44wogABAQEBAQEGgUuXDwyCFIU2AYEMF3eEBAEBAwEBAlMoCwshExIPGREeGQmIMQoLvg0BF4V8iR46FoIiD0SBQQWLLYozg3qDAgGBW5NDhAEdLwEBgQQHgUIBAQE Received: from dsl-189-170-136-110-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO morena.maps.net) ([189.170.136.110]) by nlpiport02.prodigy.net.mx with SMTP; 03 Sep 2014 21:15:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:14:59 -0700 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing problems .... Message-ID: <20140903191459.3f118c97@morena.maps.net> In-Reply-To: <5400A209.7030103@hiwaay.net> References: <5400A209.7030103@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i386-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 02:20:11 -0000 El Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:53:45 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" escribi=F3: >=20 >=20 > I am trying to get printing working under FBSD 9.3. I cribbed > printcap info from=20 > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/printing.html#= printing-quick-start=20 > & tried it out: >=20 Great, you started well, reading the manual >=20 > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:04am] 458 % service lpd status > lpd is running as pid 27062. > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:06am] 459 % printf "From jaguar:\n1. This=20 > printer can print.\n2. This is the second line.\n" | lpr > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:36am] 460 % lpq > no entries According with the next page http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Xerox/Xerox-Phaser_6130N The printer Xerox Phaser 6130N can print plain text, but in xerox.com it list PCL6 and PostScript drivers http://www.support.xerox.com/support/phaser-6130/downloads/enus.html?operat= ingSystem=3Dwinxp Since lpq said "no entries", the job was send to the printer, let see if we can diagnose why nothing was printed > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:38am] 461 % (tail printcap ) > # :lp=3D/dev/lpt0:sd=3D/var/spool/output/lpd:lf=3D/var/log/lpd-errs: > # > # ... following cribbed from Athlon-cube, FC14 ;-) .... > # > # printer|Xerox Phaser 6130N:rm=3Djaguar.cfd.com:rp=3Dprinter: > # Cups-PDF|Cups-PDF:rm=3Djaguar.cfd.com:rp=3DCups-PDF: > # > # ... following cribbed from online FBSD LP docs .... > # > lp:lp=3D:rm=3Dprinter:rp=3Draw:sh:mx#0:sd=3D/var/spool/lpd/lp:lf=3D/var/l= og/lpd-errs: In the office I have a Xerox WorkCentre 5135 and I use "rp=3Dlp", try with that, "rp=3Draw" normally is for HP printers >=20 > Nothing ever comes out of the printer, thought it does light up, it=20 > seems to know it got something .... The job arrived to the printer, but maybe to the wrong queue (rp=3Draw) > The same printf stuff above works=20 > from the shell CLI on other Linux boxen (CUPS), so the printer can=20 > handle straight ASCII text .... TIA for any clues .... The package CUPS has filters included, the LPD/LPR system included in the base does not Even your printcap file does not specify a input-filter (if=3D) Read the next post (the part referring to how LPD/LPR works) http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-August/259926.html In conclusion, try changing rp=3Dlp and let us know what happen Martin Paredes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 02:27:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472D47FB for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110EF1AD9 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-44.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s842RY5w006024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:27:35 -0500 Message-ID: <5407CF8D.3070007@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:33:49 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing problems .... References: <5400A209.7030103@hiwaay.net> <20140903191459.3f118c97@morena.maps.net> In-Reply-To: <20140903191459.3f118c97@morena.maps.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 02:27:43 -0000 On 09/03/14 21:14, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: > El Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:53:45 -0500 > "William A. Mahaffey III" escribió: >> >> I am trying to get printing working under FBSD 9.3. I cribbed >> printcap info from >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/printing.html#printing-quick-start >> & tried it out: >> > Great, you started well, reading the manual > >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:04am] 458 % service lpd status >> lpd is running as pid 27062. >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:06am] 459 % printf "From jaguar:\n1. This >> printer can print.\n2. This is the second line.\n" | lpr >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:36am] 460 % lpq >> no entries > According with the next page > > http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Xerox/Xerox-Phaser_6130N > > The printer Xerox Phaser 6130N can print plain text, but in xerox.com > it list PCL6 and PostScript drivers > > http://www.support.xerox.com/support/phaser-6130/downloads/enus.html?operatingSystem=winxp > > Since lpq said "no entries", the job was send to the printer, let see > if we can diagnose why nothing was printed > >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:48:38am] 461 % (tail printcap ) >> # :lp=/dev/lpt0:sd=/var/spool/output/lpd:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs: >> # >> # ... following cribbed from Athlon-cube, FC14 ;-) .... >> # >> # printer|Xerox Phaser 6130N:rm=jaguar.cfd.com:rp=printer: >> # Cups-PDF|Cups-PDF:rm=jaguar.cfd.com:rp=Cups-PDF: >> # >> # ... following cribbed from online FBSD LP docs .... >> # >> lp:lp=:rm=printer:rp=raw:sh:mx#0:sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs: > In the office I have a Xerox WorkCentre 5135 and I use "rp=lp", try > with that, "rp=raw" normally is for HP printers > >> Nothing ever comes out of the printer, thought it does light up, it >> seems to know it got something .... > The job arrived to the printer, but maybe to the wrong queue (rp=raw) > >> The same printf stuff above works >> from the shell CLI on other Linux boxen (CUPS), so the printer can >> handle straight ASCII text .... TIA for any clues .... > The package CUPS has filters included, the LPD/LPR system included in > the base does not > > Even your printcap file does not specify a input-filter (if=) > > Read the next post (the part referring to how LPD/LPR works) > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-August/259926.html > > In conclusion, try changing rp=lp and let us know what happen > > Martin Paredes > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Still nogo, printer light comes on, it makes a bit of noise, but no output .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 05:55:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD9D372 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42EFA1F68 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s845tcNh039954; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:55:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5407FEDA.1010206@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:55:38 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: convert for use on youtube (was: convert .mov to .avi?) References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> <540756C3.1060600@privatdemail.net> In-Reply-To: <540756C3.1060600@privatdemail.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:55:40 -0600 (MDT) Cc: bsdaddict@privatdemail.net, freebsd@edvax.de, rsmith@xs4all.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 05:55:50 -0000 >> Can anyone suggest an easy way to convert a .mov file to .avi? I >> don't have much experience with video and shot some with my camera >> when on a recent trip. My wife uses windoze to burn dvds and the >> app she has access to (windows dvd maker) doesn't seem to support >> .mov files. > I suppose "ffmpeg -i path/video1.mov path/movie2.avi" should do it > for a fast and simple convertion. Thanks all; that and some reading of the ffmpeg man page helped. Now I'm trying to convert to something smallish that will play well on youtube. According to youtube's analysis, my firefox supports "HTMLVideoElement" and "WebM VP8". I've tried converting to .avi, .mp4, and .webm but whenever I try to play them via youtube, I get the garbage about my browser not currently recognizing any of the video formats available. I've tried switching the browser between HTML5 and the default player, but no joy there. The browser successfully plays .mov files previously uploaded, but they are huge and I'm trying to save on bandwidth and storage. I believe the uploaded .mov files were converted by youtube anyway. All of the generated formats play fine through vlc. Hints? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 11:16:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36ADAE32 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC62218B4 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A82D3CD54; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:15:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s84BFoxL002243; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:15:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:15:50 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: convert for use on youtube (was: convert .mov to .avi?) Message-Id: <20140904131550.7fd40f1e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5407FEDA.1010206@dreamchaser.org> References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> <540756C3.1060600@privatdemail.net> <5407FEDA.1010206@dreamchaser.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:16:01 -0000 On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:55:38 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > > >> Can anyone suggest an easy way to convert a .mov file to .avi? I > >> don't have much experience with video and shot some with my camera > >> when on a recent trip. My wife uses windoze to burn dvds and the > >> app she has access to (windows dvd maker) doesn't seem to support > >> .mov files. > > > > > I suppose "ffmpeg -i path/video1.mov path/movie2.avi" should do it > > for a fast and simple convertion. > > Thanks all; that and some reading of the ffmpeg man page helped. > > Now I'm trying to convert to something smallish that will play well on youtube. > According to youtube's analysis, my firefox supports > "HTMLVideoElement" and "WebM VP8". > I've tried converting to > .avi, .mp4, and .webm > but whenever I try to play them via youtube, I get the garbage about my > browser not currently recognizing any of the video formats available. AVI is just a container format. Which formats (video and audio) did you put in? For example, XVid for video + MP3 for audio, or MPEG for video and AC3 for audio? With mencoder, you have control over those formats and their options (for example quality, image size, audio sampling rate and how much compression should be used). You can test with "mplayer -identify " to check what is _actually_ in a file. The web browser only supports playing video content in few formats, and usually either through a "Flash" player or WebM standard, if the required plugins, libraries and codecs have been installed. Everything else requires an external player program (even though there are browser-plugins for some players). > I've tried switching the browser between HTML5 and the default player, > but no joy there. > The browser successfully plays .mov files previously uploaded, but they > are huge and I'm trying to save on bandwidth and storage. > I believe the > uploaded .mov files were converted by youtube anyway. YouTube converts them either into "Flash" video (flv) or whatever they currently use to deliver with HTML5 (VP8?), as far as I know. > All of the generated formats play fine through vlc. That's not a problem, because vlc and mplayer play everything. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 12:46:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE93267 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F67911C0 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83EB227792; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:46:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s84CkgQY002856; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:46:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:46:42 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: convert for use on youtube Message-Id: <20140904144642.64193202.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54085A0B.7070102@bananmonarki.se> References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> <540756C3.1060600@privatdemail.net> <5407FEDA.1010206@dreamchaser.org> <20140904131550.7fd40f1e.freebsd@edvax.de> <54085A0B.7070102@bananmonarki.se> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Aitken , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:46:47 -0000 On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:24:43 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote: > On 2014-09-04 13:15, Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:55:38 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > > > You can test with "mplayer -identify " to check what is > > _actually_ in a file. > > This is a "better" command > > mplayer -frames 0 -identify movie.*, then it wont play the movie, but > give you the info. Exactly, I was searching the manual for that command (because I remembered there _is_ such a command that doesn't play anything at all, but print the information desired). :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 12:54:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 243914AE for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 811D512D8 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s84COhlE054811; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:24:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <54085A0B.7070102@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:24:43 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon , Gary Aitken Subject: Re: convert for use on youtube References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> <540756C3.1060600@privatdemail.net> <5407FEDA.1010206@dreamchaser.org> <20140904131550.7fd40f1e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140904131550.7fd40f1e.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:54:42 -0000 On 2014-09-04 13:15, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:55:38 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: > You can test with "mplayer -identify " to check what is > _actually_ in a file. This is a "better" command mplayer -frames 0 -identify movie.*, then it wont play the movie, but give you the info. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 13:05:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4E0E67E for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 637451423 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q59so10265575wes.3 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:05:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NyFZEG82wfktDlU2oxpTnosUwqp0d8dy07i1sSvuRzw=; b=AksMFyF/MnhHfkW049WdlSBNTPbPm0Vmm79MxFdQSIT5D4WMEuim+74MQfTGqi99uC gouvjbHdhokXVQWAPnb9HLGn6WQbJALCu9K2e0lmai2kueNpZpDreHyEo/Ut5Z6Y7L+U mgmUP87XcLPyU6UoGzCou7LuNaR//+WaLCylmzdbL+WbbCOaEf87oDylzh6X3p2tcMXJ IgTSXSiRj0Z2cMFgYdhT2NY9lgZGJUpPEJvVhPMFSwxr4m5fd5+DbszSQvkz6DnBugX4 SdURf8T9+pmIXZA4UbzzH+0s8+DmVf6UDV+kdyAaZM0EHjvUMjUInR6BexgAmXvY/wuJ bq+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.75.144 with SMTP id c16mr5697351wiw.9.1409835915694; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: fluca1978@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.187.18 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:05:15 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rnXnQO9U5ZQS01zHWUbKLLDY5WY Message-ID: Subject: encrypting usb stick From: Luca Ferrari To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:05:17 -0000 Hi all, what you would suggest for encrypting a partition of an USB stick so that it can be mounted read-write by both FreeBSD and Linux? So far truecrypt did the job, but I'm looking for something else since the development ended this year. Thanks, Luca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 14:19:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B337F85 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.ssimicro.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEDAE1DD9 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eriks.ssimicro.com (eriks.ssimicro.com [96.46.34.205]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s84E0rJ8060650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:00:54 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <54087095.2090802@ssimicro.com> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:00:53 -0400 From: Erik Sejr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: encrypting usb stick References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:19:06 -0000 On 04/09/14 09:05, Luca Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > what you would suggest for encrypting a partition of an USB stick so > that it can be mounted read-write by both FreeBSD and Linux? > So far truecrypt did the job, but I'm looking for something else since > the development ended this year. > > Thanks, > Luca Veracrypt https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/ picked up where Truecrypt left off in a lot of ways. It has Windows/Linux/MacOS versions, but I don't know about FreeBSD. Regards, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:04:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1094AE8 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7265714B0 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:04:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36600598 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 22:04:15 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s84F4FfV042700 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:04:15 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s84F4FbS042699 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:04:15 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:04:15 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-ID: <20140904150415.GA42638@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903205449.GB3259@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20140903211809.GA3731@aerie.jexium-island.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903211809.GA3731@aerie.jexium-island.net> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:04:19 -0000 Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:54:49PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > > alternatively: > > > > XTerm*keyboardType: vt220 > > (not in "VT100") Works too, thank you. How did you know? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:07:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC184A7 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F223D150F for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:07:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36600604 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 22:07:39 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s84F7d6C042762 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:07:39 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s84F7d16042761 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:07:39 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:07:39 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: /etc on a separate filesystem ? Message-ID: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:07:41 -0000 Colleagues, Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:17:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C81A922 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D49179D for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ty20so494169lab.21 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OC2qr0XC1ho6XNEn42NBs0Wek4GKj/U7A8KxbScslBM=; b=qXOwQcJv+rR6uRm1LgzxDKMq4wjPhzAdGxRP5zQ5RSQ2xAZqIHMvzifptmxU3joqEO mFmKp04egrW6nbC0v1dr2vV9e0F1QLCyNAwcqnvrXXgZWBs1u6maWEwujscRLD8zwGft 1/DU5DeNuLcHQGgukoVJSlWFy3JEoBamqITYLFs53BQRwzIRRO4Yv4FOTMm1xRLNe9f3 nBx3T++AR4ziUsseHCX2iyd9Djhxf8CjIQjKB2LBF8xticCwtqWueGP4MXDifZyIsYQa aHICkM1c9z60BQwcFRFvLMlBhllmrRGkYhOhYDDy7pudTJdy5UuwOv+gM3tBWQ3eX235 CUmg== X-Received: by 10.112.24.104 with SMTP id t8mr5198998lbf.46.1409843843486; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:17:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.41.15 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: dhenin@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> From: =?UTF-8?B?KOKAouKAv+KAoikgIERow6luaW4gSmVhbi1KYWNxdWVz?= Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:16:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? To: Victor Sudakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:17:27 -0000 2014-09-04 17:07 GMT+02:00 Victor Sudakov : > Colleagues, > > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > /etc/fstab for mount separate filesystem --------------------------------------------------------- (=C2=B0> Dh=C3=A9nin Jean-Jacques / ) 48, rue de la Justice 78300 Poissy ^^ dhenin@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:19:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CDE5A7A for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (mail-oi0-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041D117D0 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a141so4681366oig.6 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:19:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FIjvtwUfdopLtvcQP+6OmagxVm0z5+Us9LCfR2VEFqo=; b=KyJfkFPni+omnVAdxK89PeJKVV4Iq3JCYmI5uu61WUFOeo0Xt73L0usxenuQ7dUQZH LXqmbf7Bw5paWyrqqNAcUTB5/umVJ0jssY7oq7PpryQBiZHmzaG5//u8a4WMtN8Yhwyo kTAUnEhZf0QWo/oeA1o7gvgAL4VAJjtIqBLMs6Xi+EyGNyD7y4tT77O/k2wxzGpkiaWd Fp6BeIOU/aNc/1skTn9SVguHO5TvmFeAlxAhshl1WVt/pACNI0LpgJNR1/WBIv40O8u1 OUMYNm4Vcycw1RXInBmP+WcSv4WcdnhF+x7M6yH/hzGDnray9q5QzidwkSbgBAYnrQ0R SMKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlopf11PM9HigJPtl/hO9p/GtomXwiPmI49aAHagbtXAM+sSK3NiAwuhJzyIy6bDF06ItSi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.63.166 with SMTP id h6mr5727381oes.79.1409843676416; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.120.37 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.120.37 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:14:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:14:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? From: Michael Sierchio To: Victor Sudakov , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:19:53 -0000 No. /etc/fstab, among other things On Sep 4, 2014 8:07 AM, "Victor Sudakov" wrote: > Colleagues, > > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:30:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4AA250 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBB61934 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:30:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36600625 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 22:30:42 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s84FUgsE043069 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:30:42 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s84FUgvp043068 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:30:42 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:30:42 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? Message-ID: <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:30:45 -0000 Michael Sierchio wrote: > > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > No. /etc/fstab, among other things That's why I am asking. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:31:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1640B2DA for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3E71946 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D344E3CCD6; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:30:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s84FUwl4003371; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:30:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:30:58 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Victor Sudakov Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? Message-Id: <20140904173058.aed32c96.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:31:03 -0000 On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:07:39 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? It is problematic. The file /etc/fstab is used to mount the file systems, and /etc/rc controls the whole system startup. There would have to be a replacement located on / which is later on removed from /etc, so that the desired partition can be mounted instead. Probably it's possible to achieve this goal by modifying the location of files involved in the boot process before /etc can be mounted, but that would require dealing with lower-level OS internals. For example, /fstab and /rc could be used (located on /) which make /etc available and "continue from there". But it also would mean you have _two_ fstab's and rc's. But those two aren't probably the only "offenders": what about /etc/ttys, /etc/gettytab or the /etc/rc.d/ subtree? They'll also be needed. In general, the idea doesn't look much appealing. ;-) The /etc directoriy is too fundamental to early-stage OS operations that it deserves being on the / partition. Keep in mind that it traditioally even had programs in it that were required to boot the system, like /etc/mount, /etc/GETTY or /etc/fsck. It's name /etc, meaning "et cetera", initially pointed out that there were "further programs" that were considered important to the OS. Operating systems such as UNIX System III, WEGA or SunOS / early Solaris followed that concept. Later on, /etc became the place for OS configuration files, often called "editable text configuration". :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 16:11:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED2AFA8 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60941F0E for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 452C633C24; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:11:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Victor Sudakov Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:11:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> (Victor Sudakov's message of "Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:30:42 +0700") Message-ID: <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:11:48 -0000 Victor Sudakov writes: > Michael Sierchio wrote: >> > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? >> No. /etc/fstab, among other things > > That's why I am asking. It kind of depends on *why* you're asking. A lot of /etc doesn't *really* need to be there right from the start, and some of it could be trimmed down if space is a problem. [For example.] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 16:23:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285004E3 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com (mail-pd0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F29EB107E for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id r10so13941291pdi.36 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:23:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=y6xz8uPkV0uSLiY6+uYtTmvSRLjZfi/uG+y/5fepnHE=; b=tMPYOHuJglaHokYIXEoB+E/N4QcoceGTNzjHKR7zMXnDsikGpqdcpkVSjQb5f6ufG3 eVtjL6VTaMyFkWj4iIQxwi0kc2awDh5LMcBgJv6UiLCDCRs7FSdQqTQpSvfU+rlfh6ua ndvyNKZ3G9hscowVeD7dcL1AZ3TmcgJQGP1tbyhmlw8BrrjuIsNZxIC+krknu4ejOcKj C4A30HVq8PB6MBVZZC/LGWEs4qKfylHSapP4us68taG1zC8LIhf6SZ4Apvc4T8uSZzYN CniFvo4Ynsm8390oQBex6xmm4K2lhdsp8x3+zfffVbayXIi9MFtzl/B01l6ueWrT+6LC FRJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.119.103 with SMTP id kt7mr10076762pab.95.1409847792448; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.118.132 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:23:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:23:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? From: Adam Vande More To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Victor Sudakov X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:23:14 -0000 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Victor Sudakov writes: > > > Michael Sierchio wrote: > >> > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > >> No. /etc/fstab, among other things > > > > That's why I am asking. > > It kind of depends on *why* you're asking. Sounds an awful lot like an XY problem to me. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 17:43:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 037CEAB9 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF361CCA for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s84HE5e0001499; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:14:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <54089DDD.1040203@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:14:05 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:43:46 -0000 On 04/09/2014 16:07, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > Lots of people have already pointed out that /etc/fstab is need to mount all file systems other than /. However, the answer is actually yes, if you are prepared to do a bit of work, and you can do it within the standard FBSD framework. nanobsd is an example of this, as is pfSense (or at least the embedded version I run). The magic happens by creating /etc/diskless, which causes /etc/rc to source /etc/initdiskless before doing any other rc work. This was intended for diskless machines which mount their file systems via NFS, but can be (ab)used for other purposes. I suggest you take a look at /etc/initdiskless, which has documentation as a comment near the beginning, and possibly /usr/src/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh which builds FBSD for appliances. Be warned that this isn't something for the inexperienced user. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 21:55:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298CF106 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz", Issuer "STARNET" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C111BFA for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:53:47 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?UmFkZWsgS3JlasSNYQ==?= To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:53:46 +0200 Subject: Multiqueue problem? Or what? Thread-Topic: Multiqueue problem? Or what? Thread-Index: Ac/IirUZatIybJd3RuObHUB8tBj3eQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:55:01 -0000 SGVsbG8sDQoNCkkgaGF2ZSBwcm9ibGVtIHdpdGggbmV3IGJvYXJkcyBmcm9tIHN1cGVybWljcm8u IFRoZXJlIGFyZSAyIG5pY3MgSW50ZWwgcHJvLCB3aGljaCBzdXBwb3J0cyBtdWx0aXF1ZXVlLiBJ IGJvb3QgYWxsIGZyZWVic2QgYm94ZXMgZnJvbSB0aGUgc2FtZSBpbWFnZSBhcyBkaXNrbGVzcyBh bmQgYWxsIGJveGVzIGFyZSBOQVRzIHdpdGggcGYuIEV2ZXJ5IGJveCB3b3JrcyBwZXJmZWN0bHks IGJ1dCBvbmx5IDIgbmV3IGJveGVzIHdpdGggdGhpcyBib2FyZCBoYXZlIHByb2JsZW1zLiBCdXQg SSBjYW5ub3Qgc2F5IHdoZXJlLg0KDQpTaXR1YXRpb24gaXMgZm9sbG93aW5nIC0gYWZ0ZXIgc3Rh cnQgaXMgZXZlcnl0aGluZyBvay4gQnV0IGZvciBzb21lIGhvdXJzIGJpZ2dlciBzdHJlYW1zIGFy ZSBzdGFydGluZyB0byBkaXNjb25uZWN0LiBCaWdnZXIgc3RyZWFtcyAtIGl0IG1lYW5zIHN0cmVh bSBhYm91dCBhIGZldyBtZWdhYnl0ZXMuIFBhZ2VzLCBtb3N0bHksIHdvcmsuDQoNCkZyb20gb25l IG9yIHNlY29uZCBzaWRlIGlzIGNvbm5lY3Rpb24gd29ya2luZyAtIGJ1dCBwcm9ibGVtIGlzIG9u bHkgdHJhZmZpYyBvdmVyIHBmLg0KDQpJIHRyeSB0byBjYXRjaCBhbnkgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbi4g SSBkb250IGtub3csIGlmIGlzIHRoaXMgVEhFIHByb2JsZW0sIGJ1dCBpdCBsb29rcyB0aGF0IGNv bW11bmljYXRpb24gZW5kcyB3aXRoIHRoaXM6DQoNCjc0MwkzLjMwMTI3OQk0Ni4yNTUuMjI0Ljk1 CTEwLjMuNTkuMjIyCVRDUAk1NAlbVENQIEFDS2VkIHVuc2VlbiBzZWdtZW50XSA4MOKGkjU1ODU5 IFtSU1QsIEFDS10gU2VxPTY5OTM5MyBBY2s9NzgwIFdpbj0xNzUyMCBMZW49MA0KDQpUaGVyZSBp cyBub3RoaW5nIGluIGxvZ3MuIFN5c3RlbSBsb29rcyBmaW5lIGFuZCB0aGlzIGlzIHRoZSBzYW1l IGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gd2hpY2ggd29ya3MgZmluZSBlbHNld2hlcmUuIEkgdHJ5IHRvIGNoYW5n ZSBib2FyZCBmb3Igb3RoZXJzIChidXQgdGhlIHNhbWUgc2VyLiBuby4pIGFuZCBwcm9ibGVtIGlz IHRoZSBzYW1lLg0KDQpwYXJ0IG9mIGRtZXNnOg0KDQppZ2IwOiA8SW50ZWwoUikgUFJPLzEwMDAg TmV0d29yayBDb25uZWN0aW9uIHZlcnNpb24gLSAyLjQuMD4gcG9ydCAweGQwMDAtMHhkMDFmIG1l bSAweGY3MjAwMDAwLTB4ZjcyN2ZmZmYsMHhmNzI4MDAwMC0weGY3MjgzZmZmIGlycSAxOCBhdCBk ZXZpY2UgMC4wIG9uIHBjaTUNCmlnYjA6IFVzaW5nIE1TSVggaW50ZXJydXB0cyB3aXRoIDUgdmVj dG9ycw0KaWdiMDogRXRoZXJuZXQgYWRkcmVzczogMDA6MjU6OTA6ZjQ6ZGI6MzgNCmlnYjA6IEJv dW5kIHF1ZXVlIDAgdG8gY3B1IDANCmlnYjA6IEJvdW5kIHF1ZXVlIDEgdG8gY3B1IDENCmlnYjA6 IEJvdW5kIHF1ZXVlIDIgdG8gY3B1IDINCmlnYjA6IEJvdW5kIHF1ZXVlIDMgdG8gY3B1IDMNCnBj aWI2OiA8QUNQSSBQQ0ktUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gaXJxIDE5IGF0IGRldmljZSAyOC4zIG9uIHBjaTAN CnBjaTY6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWI2DQppZ2IxOiA8SW50ZWwoUikgUFJPLzEwMDAg TmV0d29yayBDb25uZWN0aW9uIHZlcnNpb24gLSAyLjQuMD4gcG9ydCAweGMwMDAtMHhjMDFmIG1l bSAweGY3MTAwMDAwLTB4ZjcxN2ZmZmYsMHhmNzE4MDAwMC0weGY3MTgzZmZmIGlycSAxOSBhdCBk ZXZpY2UgMC4wIG9uIHBjaTYNCmlnYjE6IFVzaW5nIE1TSVggaW50ZXJydXB0cyB3aXRoIDUgdmVj dG9ycw0KaWdiMTogRXRoZXJuZXQgYWRkcmVzczogMDA6MjU6OTA6ZjQ6ZGI6MzkNCmlnYjE6IEJv dW5kIHF1ZXVlIDAgdG8gY3B1IDQNCmlnYjE6IEJvdW5kIHF1ZXVlIDEgdG8gY3B1IDUNCmlnYjE6 IEJvdW5kIHF1ZXVlIDIgdG8gY3B1IDYNCmlnYjE6IEJvdW5kIHF1ZXVlIDMgdG8gY3B1IDcNCg0K dW5hbWU6DQpGcmVlQlNEIHRlc3Quc3Rhcm5ldC5jeiAxMC4wLVJFTEVBU0UtcDcgRnJlZUJTRCAx MC4wLVJFTEVBU0UtcDcgIzEgcjI3MTA0NjogV2VkIFNlcCAgMyAyMzo1MDozOSBDRVNUIDIwMTQg ICAgIHJvb3RAY29tcGlsZXIuc3Rhcm5ldC5jejovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9OQVQtMTAu MCAgYW1kNjQNCg0KSSBkb250IGtub3cgd2hhdCBJIHNob3VsZCBjaGVjayBhbmQgdGVzdC4gRXZl cnkgbG9va3MgZmluZSwgYnV0IG5vdCB3b3JrLi4uDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdQ0KUmFkZWsNCg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 00:40:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F8D22F for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net (vms173007pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BCE1C99 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([unknown] [96.255.39.109]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0NBE00D4XKIFJ5B0@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:39:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (aerie [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s850dpP5014178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:39:51 -0400 Received: (from tom@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id s850dosK014177; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:39:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:39:50 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: Victor Sudakov Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-id: <20140905003950.GB13977@aerie.jexium-island.net> Reply-to: dickey@his.com References: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903205449.GB3259@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20140903211809.GA3731@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20140904150415.GA42638@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <20140904150415.GA42638@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:40:03 -0000 --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:04:15PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:54:49PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > >=20 > > > alternatively: > > >=20 > > > XTerm*keyboardType: vt220 > >=20 > > (not in "VT100") >=20 > Works too, thank you. > How did you know? It was "an educated guess" (I maintain ncurses and xterm) --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQJBlYACgkQcCNT4PfkjttPkgCeN47XJ52eRi3SMSM5HP6W42+V yIcAnROPX22yXEDyMctZsXS8w6VLeXcJ =d3PC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 02:47:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049637C1 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 02:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C5A1A5F for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 02:46:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36601756; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:46:56 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s852ktx7052193; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:46:56 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s852ktRg052192; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:46:55 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:46:55 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-ID: <20140905024655.GA51629@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903205449.GB3259@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20140903211809.GA3731@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20140904150415.GA42638@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140905003950.GB13977@aerie.jexium-island.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140905003950.GB13977@aerie.jexium-island.net> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 02:47:01 -0000 Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > > > > > > alternatively: > > > > > > > > XTerm*keyboardType: vt220 > > > > > > (not in "VT100") > > > > Works too, thank you. > > How did you know? > > It was "an educated guess" (I maintain ncurses and xterm) Great! Could you try and make another educated guess? ;-) What could have changed in FreeBSD between 8.4 and 9.3 that caused this problem? I have always used vim+screen on my FreeBSD 8.4 box at work from my 9.3-STABLE desktop at home (over ssh, from X). The problem with the "Home" and "End" keys arose when I upgraded the work box to 9.3. Of course the upgrade involved the update of all ports, so maybe vim or screen are to blame and not FreeBSD per se. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 03:08:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19ACC7D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9221D0C for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:08:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36601791 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:08:13 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8538DB5053377 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:08:13 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s8538DbA053376 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:08:13 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:08:13 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? Message-ID: <20140905030813.GA52942@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:08:16 -0000 Adam Vande More wrote: > > > > > Michael Sierchio wrote: > > >> > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > > >> No. /etc/fstab, among other things > > > > > > That's why I am asking. > > > > It kind of depends on *why* you're asking. > > > Sounds an awful lot like an XY problem to me. That's fair. Let me explain my purpose. I have created a LiveUSB for testing and hardware diagnostics with dualboot: FreeBSD amd64 and i386. I was looking for a way for them to share a common /etc. If there is no easy way, I can rsync changes of /etc from one system to another on shutdown, or find something else. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 03:13:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E3AD7A for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D780F1DC6 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k48so11144462wev.28 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:13:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RilVss7WIo4l6XHGMfs4gWrIKI1zv0sr/v5AqJIgxHw=; b=m9/v6BME/DSxRN2VSEtNmWfld65V625cJl5rDcExd6rhfslm1oQbf1ZuPVJImBSyKH ZMqzbQFSAaBwfpW1V5SLI4maGQOYUG60U/1cOKFVy6eNkVjGtVMf6tx4Vw8scpo1xaes s89fN228CzRipWYJQAahZ2ezvzzo6byPzdAJJRAZEJQhkCixO4RNMBufiSpukUUxsENa 2NUEP8fRWJHJJUx2rPqcsfXhd1uvtp8b+efABCG/E8YHxT+ukRGXUzgLgeAvd4cpdgY7 LFTrlJsTPQuf/BzKmw+JBOH59cdrXnNAbSe0ldCX/ClJ5RCu2HPDE3FMPucfzzkR8wr2 iFwQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.58.244 with SMTP id u20mr11324936wjq.36.1409886795996; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.174.166 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:13:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Port version vs PKG version From: Boris To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:13:18 -0000 Hi all, Maybe a dumb question but how quickly should a new version of a package become available through pkg ? I am asking as I just spent sometime getting rrdtool to work which I finally did by installing the port. http://www.freshports.org/databases/rrdtool/ shows version 1.4.8_4 from the 30th of Aug while the package still shows version 1.4.8_2 pkg search rrdtool [..] rrdtool-1.4.8_2 [..] #pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. As of: #date Thu Sep 4 22:57:43 EDT 2014 Note: I had to upgrade as 'rrdinfo' and 'rrdupdate' segfault Thanks in advance, Boris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 03:35:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F8A47C for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7151FAC for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hz20so13118983lab.31 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:35:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pkWOsjCdaeOvNPh9mRXTeEW/m3g00bi33CrHC5FuhbY=; b=x8nVgxUcM3XIKtNZ6Sp002eYse77Wk3EdgIBYwQkDggJJgMNzXSnhTZkpTYMJ3S1mN yLqHqkTMsUKDXn77mZ/iD+iNmbItqIM7ZuURssXKEtcA3KNIhMNcer0zEi9iyhVfy8e1 HP9p0p4ObSZU/jdR9HOHCrMSZNeYy8xcrEsHD1ufxqdKyKtgAUX1rH0asxWjhDqHXNz5 GfC8SiPoEZ9mwoc+/lLO2dFXORVGtDnHbz+0gnGO3paPxZHVqDLBJw+zhNcoDwq6+dKg cCJJS2dRXAHNBa3sR+5Ti9dDZPfZ4ZeJFHXuvCkRd2CsLz8NDTJUwjHfuQtOYTmEsfu0 K8iQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.19.70 with SMTP id c6mr8411641lbe.20.1409888145541; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.44.202 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:35:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140905030813.GA52942@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20140905030813.GA52942@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:35:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? From: Adam Vande More To: Victor Sudakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:35:48 -0000 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Adam Vande More wrote: > > > > > > > Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > >> > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > > > >> No. /etc/fstab, among other things > > > > > > > > That's why I am asking. > > > > > > It kind of depends on *why* you're asking. > > > > > > Sounds an awful lot like an XY problem to me. > > That's fair. Let me explain my purpose. I have created a LiveUSB for > testing and hardware diagnostics with dualboot: FreeBSD amd64 and > i386. I was looking for a way for them to share a common /etc. > > If there is no easy way, I can rsync changes of /etc from one system > to another on shutdown, or find something else. That is a better description. If this tool is going to be confined to a network you have control over, doing a diskless mount on /etc may be sufficient. Otherwise unison does FS synchronization, or you could take a more targeted approach with rcs(1). -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 03:59:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692FE823 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E941249 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:59:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36601881; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:59:04 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s853x3sG054737; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:59:03 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s853x3wL054736; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:59:03 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:59:03 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: Michael Sierchio , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? Message-ID: <20140905035903.GA54562@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20140905030813.GA52942@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:59:07 -0000 Michael Sierchio wrote: > >> > >> > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > >> > >> No. /etc/fstab, among other things > >> > > > >> > > That's why I am asking. > >> > > >> > It kind of depends on *why* you're asking. > >> > >> > >> Sounds an awful lot like an XY problem to me. > > > > That's fair. Let me explain my purpose. I have created a LiveUSB for > > testing and hardware diagnostics with dualboot: FreeBSD amd64 and > > i386. I was looking for a way for them to share a common /etc. > > > > If there is no easy way, I can rsync changes of /etc from one system > > to another on shutdown, or find something else. > > You can always do a covering mount of /etc. I can, but the covering mount will not be available at boot time yet, when files from /etc are being read and executed. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 04:06:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08CFD938 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 04:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6719F1325 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 04:06:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36601885; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:06:38 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8546bGR054981; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:06:37 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s8546bhl054980; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:06:37 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:06:37 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? Message-ID: <20140905040637.GB54562@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20140905030813.GA52942@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 04:06:41 -0000 Adam Vande More wrote: > > > > > > > > > Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > >> > Is it possible to keep /etc on a separate filesystem? > > > > >> No. /etc/fstab, among other things > > > > > > > > > > That's why I am asking. > > > > > > > > It kind of depends on *why* you're asking. > > > > > > > > > Sounds an awful lot like an XY problem to me. > > > > That's fair. Let me explain my purpose. I have created a LiveUSB for > > testing and hardware diagnostics with dualboot: FreeBSD amd64 and > > i386. I was looking for a way for them to share a common /etc. > > > > If there is no easy way, I can rsync changes of /etc from one system > > to another on shutdown, or find something else. > > > That is a better description. If this tool is going to be confined to a > network you have control over, doing a diskless mount on /etc may be > sufficient. Otherwise unison does FS synchronization, What FS synchronization? Remember, I don't need to synchronize the whole root fs, just /etc. > or you could take a > more targeted approach with rcs(1). Whatever means can be used to synchronize two copies of /etc (certainly more than one), they are still two copies which can fall out of sync eventually. One common copy would be a KISS solution. Who exactly reads /etc/fstab? The kernel, I suppose, before it even looks for init? Can the kernel be modified to look for it somewhere else, like in /boot/fstab ? Or could I just redefine vfs.root.mountfrom to a small partition with a minimum set of files, and then have init look for /etc/rc in the real /etc ? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 05:18:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE1BEAB for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BB81A54 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s855IS07043959; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:18:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <540947A4.2030506@dreamchaser.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 23:18:28 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: convert for use on youtube References: <54073D3E.9080808@dreamchaser.org> <540756C3.1060600@privatdemail.net> <5407FEDA.1010206@dreamchaser.org> <20140904131550.7fd40f1e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140904131550.7fd40f1e.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Thu, 04 Sep 2014 23:18:29 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 05:18:45 -0000 >> Now I'm trying to convert to something smallish that will play well on youtube. >> According to youtube's analysis, my firefox supports >> "HTMLVideoElement" and "WebM VP8". >> I've tried converting to >> .avi, .mp4, and .webm >> but whenever I try to play them via youtube, I get the garbage about my >> browser not currently recognizing any of the video formats available. > > AVI is just a container format. Which formats (video and audio) > did you put in? For example, XVid for video + MP3 for audio, or > MPEG for video and AC3 for audio? With mencoder, you have control > over those formats and their options (for example quality, image > size, audio sampling rate and how much compression should be used). > > You can test with "mplayer -identify " to check what is > _actually_ in a file. > > The web browser only supports playing video content in few formats, > and usually either through a "Flash" player or WebM standard, if > the required plugins, libraries and codecs have been installed. > Everything else requires an external player program (even though > there are browser-plugins for some players). > >> I've tried switching the browser between HTML5 and the default player, >> but no joy there. >> The browser successfully plays .mov files previously uploaded, but they >> are huge and I'm trying to save on bandwidth and storage. > >> I believe the >> uploaded .mov files were converted by youtube anyway. > > YouTube converts them either into "Flash" video (flv) or > whatever they currently use to deliver with HTML5 (VP8?), > as far as I know. Thanks. I created different .webm files with vp8 and vorbis and uploaded them, but they didn't play (over a period of several hours). However, some hours later they do play; apparently there's some magic done to them *after* all of the upload processing is supposedly done. Or at least that's what it appears like. An uploaded big .mov file plays right away; in what form it's fed to the browser is not at all clear to me. However, this might all be a feature of time of day and the youtube load. Is there an easy way to tell what the content being served to the browser actually is? In any case, thanks for the info on ffmpeg and mplayer. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 06:05:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4088C8 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 06:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599841EAF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 06:05:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36602060 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:05:09 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s856595A057752 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:05:09 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s856588t057751 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:05:08 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:05:08 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc on a separate filesystem ? Message-ID: <20140905060508.GA57116@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140904150739.GA42707@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140904153042.GA42968@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <448ulz5ps3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20140905030813.GA52942@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 06:05:12 -0000 Adam Vande More wrote: > > > > That's fair. Let me explain my purpose. I have created a LiveUSB for > > testing and hardware diagnostics with dualboot: FreeBSD amd64 and > > i386. I was looking for a way for them to share a common /etc. > > > > If there is no easy way, I can rsync changes of /etc from one system > > to another on shutdown, or find something else. > > > That is a better description. If this tool is going to be confined to a > network you have control over, doing a diskless mount on /etc may be Most of the time there would be no network connection at all. Just a FreeBSD LiveUSB pendrive inserted into some PC. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 07:07:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 727D2E1D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA97514A8 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8577hZ0023741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:07:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8577hZ0023741 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8577hZ0023741; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <5409613C.2060708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:07:40 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port version vs PKG version References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RkBxA7HogngMalioIUIDkVH99R0gQe0WT" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 07:07:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --RkBxA7HogngMalioIUIDkVH99R0gQe0WT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/09/2014 04:13, Boris wrote: > Maybe a dumb question but how quickly should a new version of a package= > become available through pkg ? Package sets are built from ports starting each Wednesday night, and are usually published the following weekend. So the shortest possible time it takes is about 3--4 days, and the longest is a week longer than that. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --RkBxA7HogngMalioIUIDkVH99R0gQe0WT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUCWE+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATkAoP/i1Jlnl8eaYPx3XkpaGYyIRo HLMLA/GDlR7wR/T9NRRVyNvLstJU3eYmTwlM8Xjf43A8ESlP3H16r/Ktykj8ol/X /OUYZk8zdbS9WnfMhBkO40QieHEQ27EhGIJ5CtYgzYVo3m9LvhgLz0CSKJknPYLG AuJk6ifyJTT+VWlsCjAnKLB2WbSPzlCI1JE+UzRSnoLe7iw2rqI54Bu/yTbAtFDB 7JX5U7rbXP5aENBGU03BNlqRnAN6O8Sbu0OAchQGs+iKUWuoB9cez8RqW8A5/+Qu aAhGTjLEu7gLhRzyM2UxRGaTfiCnEWHz1N+AKG86TYT6kelpC/zyb0LSC+lgG9ii 4emqUPQ+AfAIhLP5qIaBp2zlNySiTTQZaw18CZUStGuoToAX33G/i7UEyA1PErbN k+NP+NfEuADzdFNwz0L92to77VVW2zcPuT0KPrejXIy4+P7vLNmXv7qVC5xCmgIv zdiG5TrjvWabEdAxguCqmgZEROMkZZgIrvUGIv91IEmmUm/NWHZ3YBqVkFgvx8TS AU28GlSanhT4s11DGEYTDRFhP5cB/52SwdCiFuOEY/tjhQOwK7kZWM615ERSokAI wNGwsifiZAnI8pfkcoMD9kaZl767Q3MgzZlU2UAjkYnxaOoEWZNMcpS8S8eNJcax UyV5/oXmbfZy6lJrGMHq =uxhq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RkBxA7HogngMalioIUIDkVH99R0gQe0WT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 08:47:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F26F7541 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8601A1F47 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id nLnk1o005516WCc01Lnl4U; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:47:46 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fsVSZTIf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=OOzCJWdBeL0A:10 a=TR_4FDNCDigA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=_SoIQD0lwFyc1lODu-0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XPpBI-00018I-JB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:47:44 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:47:43 +0100 Message-ID: <2235025.v0bkLTEWN2@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5409613C.2060708@FreeBSD.org> References: <5409613C.2060708@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: Port version vs PKG version Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:47:55 -0000 On Friday 05 September 2014 08:07:40 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Package sets are built from ports starting each Wednesday night, and > are usually published the following weekend. So the shortest > possible time it takes is about 3--4 days, and the longest is a > week longer than that. I have a mixture of ports and packages so it looks as though the best way of keeping them in step would be to update my ports tree late Wednesday night then wait until Sunday night before attempting to upgrade ports and packages? I understand that the package repositories are built from a snapshot of the ports tree. To assist users in keeping things in step I wonder if information could be made available for users to access the snapshot which was used for the published version of the repository so we could synchronise our ports tree with the one used for the currently available packages? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 14:41:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126C83CC; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 108E61DD5; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s85Ef3W6024250; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:41:03 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:41:03 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Roland Smith Subject: Re: Recreating the FreeBSD Installation Disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20140905190747.L58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Martin G. McCormick" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:41:16 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 534, Issue 9, Message: 21 On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:38:40 +0200 Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 09:46:00AM -0500, Martin G. McCormick wrote: > > Roland Smith writes: > > > Looking at the mkisofs manpage, it *should* detect hard links by default. > > > Does > > > using the `-cache-inodes` option make any difference? > > > > I tried explicitly -no-cache-inodes and then -cache-inodes and > > the two files vary by about 15 bytes. It looks like the hard > > links are lost in the mounting process which means that one can > > not use that as a test after all. > > There is nothing in the md or mdconfig manual pages about hard links. So it > looks like you're right. It seems that's correct regarding md, but there are also strangenesses with tar (same version as Martin's: bsdtar 2.8.5 - libarchive 2.8.5) I ran some more tests on reading this, on a 9.2-S system from about six weeks ago (9.3-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Jun 25), using the 9.3-R dvd1.iso As reported, I'd run dvd1_to_memstick.sh to convert the dvd1.iso to a memstick.img - though I've yet to install it, nor check if bsdconfig needs patching to point pkg to its packages, which had been an issue with the 10.0-R memstick made from dvd1. This worked fine with 9.2-R, and I just checked to find the same hard links investigated below ARE CORRECT even though I used the same script to create the memstick from which this system was installed, so I'm a bit confused as to what's happening here .. it almost seems that the process of installing these files re-hard-links them? via mtree maybe? > To test it, you could use `ls -i` on two files in the mounted CD-ROM image > that you suspect should be hard-linked. E.g. ${CD}/bin/[ and ${CD}/bin/test. > If they don't return the same inode number md(4) does not provide hard links. That seems to be the case, at least from an .iso image. Details below. > > There is that version of tar as in tar-3.1.2 which I can't seem > > to locate anywhere although the version may be at a higher > > number by now. > > How did you get it? I've not found anything for tar on > > FreeBSD except for gnutar and that does not process iso9660 > > images. > > tar 3.1.2 is the version included in FreeBSD 10. Since libarchive and cpio have > the same version, I assume they belong together. > > What you could try is copy /usr/src/contrib/libarchive/ from 10.0 in to your > 9.1 source tree and see if you can build it on 9.1. It'd be cool if someone using 10 could check the behaviours shown below to see if the later version of tar really is a solution, and to see if md showing hardlinked files with the right number of links, but each with a different inode is really a problem, apart from the extra space? Here goes: root@x200:~ # rm -rf ~smithi/mstk_tmp/* root@x200:~ # tar -pxf ~smithi/FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso -C ~smithi/mstk_tmp tar: Ignoring out-of-order file (etc/aliases) 88256512 < 88256726 tar: Ignoring out-of-order file (etc/resolv.conf) 88700928 < 88702606 [.. hundreds of these, but no apparent problem afterwards ..] tar: Ignoring out-of-order file (usr/share/vi/catalog/nl_NL.ISO8859-1) 1799053312 < 1799064190 tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. root@x200:~ # du -hd1 ~smithi/mstk_tmp 1.2M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/bin 83M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/boot 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/dev 2.5M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/etc 8.6M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/lib 244k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/libexec 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/media 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/mnt 1G /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/packages 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/proc 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/rescue 12k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/root 5.1M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/sbin 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/tmp 642M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/usr 296k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/var 1.6M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/.rr_moved 1.7G /home/smithi/mstk_tmp Just looking at files in bin with 2 hard links .. sbin, usr/bin and usr/sbin seem to contain most of the other hardlinked files. smithi@x200:~ % ls -li ~/mstk_tmp/bin | grep ' 2 ' | sort 2889706 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 382400 Jul 11 10:14 csh 2889706 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 382400 Jul 11 10:14 tcsh 2889714 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 54816 Jul 11 10:14 ed 2889714 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 54816 Jul 11 10:14 red 2889722 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11424 Jul 11 10:14 link 2889722 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11424 Jul 11 10:14 ln 2889727 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 18048 Jul 11 10:14 pgrep 2889727 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 18048 Jul 11 10:14 pkill 2889733 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 15664 Jul 11 10:14 rm 2889733 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 15664 Jul 11 10:14 unlink 2889741 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11688 Jul 11 10:14 [ 2889741 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11688 Jul 11 10:14 test So these directory entries show 2 links, and each of the pair have the same inode number, as one would expect. However with the .iso as /dev/md0 mounted on /mnt, the link counts do _show_ eg '2' - but the files are shown as having unique inodes, which might? be the way they appear on an actual DVD; I have no machine with a DVD drive to test that theory. root@x200:~ # rm -rf ~smithi/mstk_tmp/* root@x200:~ # mdconfig -f ~smithi/FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso md0 root@x200:~ # mdconfig -lv md0 vnode 1718M /home/smithi/FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso root@x200:~ # mount_cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt smithi@x200:~ % ls -li /mnt/bin | grep ' 2 ' | sort 92918 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 382400 Jul 11 10:14 csh 93640 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 54816 Jul 11 10:14 ed 94448 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11424 Jul 11 10:14 link 94568 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11424 Jul 11 10:14 ln 95156 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 18048 Jul 11 10:14 pgrep 95278 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 18048 Jul 11 10:14 pkill 96002 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 54816 Jul 11 10:14 red 96120 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 15664 Jul 11 10:14 rm 97104 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 382400 Jul 11 10:14 tcsh 97224 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11688 Jul 11 10:14 test 97344 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 15664 Jul 11 10:14 unlink 97594 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 11688 Jul 11 10:14 [ ie, link counts are right, but separate inodes per file. root@x200:~ # tar -cf - -C /mnt . | tar -xpf - -C /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/ As per bsdtar(1), and the recipe used by Darren in dvd1_to_memstick.sh Nothing reported on stdout, but all hard links are now lost .. smithi@x200:~ % ls -li ~/mstk_tmp/bin | grep ' 2 ' | sort smithi@x200:~ % smithi@x200:~ % ls -li ~/mstk_tmp/bin | sort 3384240 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12080 Jul 11 10:14 cat 3384241 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8152 Jul 11 10:14 chflags 3384242 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18504 Jul 11 10:14 chio 3384243 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8624 Jul 11 10:14 chmod 3384244 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21072 Jul 11 10:14 cp 3384245 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 382400 Jul 11 10:14 csh [..] 3384279 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 382400 Jul 11 10:14 tcsh 3384280 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11688 Jul 11 10:14 test 3384281 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15664 Jul 11 10:14 unlink 3384282 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7240 Jul 11 10:14 uuidgen 3384283 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11688 Jul 11 10:14 [ root@x200:~ # du -hd1 ~smithi/mstk_tmp | vs tar -pxf .iso 1.7M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/bin | vs 1.2M 83M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/boot 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/dev 2.5M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/etc 8.6M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/lib 244k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/libexec 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/media 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/mnt 1G /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/packages 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/proc 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/rescue 1.6M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/.rr_moved 20k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/root | vs 12K (.cshrc) 6.2M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/sbin | vs 5.1M 4.0k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/tmp 774M /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/usr | vs 642M 296k /home/smithi/mstk_tmp/var 1.9G /home/smithi/mstk_tmp | vs 1.7G Copying md(4)'s daddy phk@ for potential instant enlightenment :) Also in search of explanation is why 'tar -cf . | tar -xpf -' lost links but reports no errors, while tar -xpf isofile doesn't lose hardlinks but (here) complains or in Martin's case, couldn't make a dir so lost files? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 14:41:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA90599 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2179B1DEE for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:41:48 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,473,1406610000"; d="scan'208";a="74834277" Received: from nlpiport23.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.97]) by nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2014 09:41:47 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtVGABvKCVS9qohu/2dsb2JhbABZgw1TV69uAQECAgaBS5c9DIIUhSwEBAIBgQcXd4QEAQEEAQJTMwsYCRMSDxkRHhmIRAu+UgEXhXyJHjoWhDYFizSKOoN7gwIBgVyTSoQBHS+CTwEBAQ Received: from dsl-189-170-136-110-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO morena.maps.net) ([189.170.136.110]) by nlpiport23.prodigy.net.mx with SMTP; 05 Sep 2014 09:40:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:40:41 -0700 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing problems .... Message-ID: <20140905074041.1f2ca56f@morena.maps.net> In-Reply-To: <5407CF8D.3070007@hiwaay.net> References: <5400A209.7030103@hiwaay.net> <20140903191459.3f118c97@morena.maps.net> <5407CF8D.3070007@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i386-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:41:49 -0000 El Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:33:49 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" escribi=F3: >=20 > On 09/03/14 21:14, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-August/259926= .html > > > > In conclusion, try changing rp=3Dlp and let us know what happen > > > > Martin Paredes > > _______________________________________________ >=20 > Still nogo, printer light comes on, it makes a bit of noise, but no=20 > output .... >=20 Are you sending text or postscript? Try sending postscript, if you have installed "ghostscript9" use the file /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.06/examples/alphabet.ps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:36:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9B0E46 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f182.google.com (mail-yk0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11571D95 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 19so7134523ykq.41 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:36:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=JJ7A1LsWEkkIXuEVHwNlFsy7Q7jUl+BlATrBfCpP0Tk=; b=J9NOMWHtciVMgPGARCaAKMRzJxHaLvZq92hxEiav+gFEJYBxx+DXk6vmllx7fZO7ig 0lmf3Q7d1pMA9WpHPxAILeFTbJTCf6qT13KGRhqVsWs0PFFfo2nCIyl/7du4kP8BzAet hZzNC2zqvaEm3MCAHRCPAZors7vz9N5JeyEwVA3dGhcS4Q2LzwPSziAmOa656Zn3f//o 4wXdMWPyuh4DJTAqVevwAMbGahr1Z+1vy/K8YYQUA2MwcmCBukLE0m22UpVR3hfc0C75 wBEaeO/9CT+hxH0ItQj/JhaMICvxZJdXRKDkUiRdLXhWKfFT0It9LmqOR6PwdZ97a2YO ZhsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7vtgUQDxLuhfvc/kXFFKnD8nmqINW2QcZdS1IcHdPAsYjbRCxY6N+IMsOaubZ3wqXmW6d X-Received: by 10.236.114.131 with SMTP id c3mr16527962yhh.56.1409934610479; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:30:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.111.68 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:29:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Esson Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Root Mount Error after upgrade to 8.4-RELEASE from 8.3-RELEASE To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:36:32 -0000 Hi Folks, I am struggling with a freebsd-update issue and could use some advice. After successfully installing the updates a reboot fails to mount the root file system with the above error. I have attached a link to a series of screen shots with some commentary https://Redstor.share.centrastor.co.uk/invitations?invitation=e1105995f78214b1ce61 Has anyone seen similar? Regards, Paul Esson* | **Redstor Limited* *Direct: *0118 951 5235 |* Mob:* 0776 690 6514 *Web: *www.redstor.com Disclaimer: The information included in this e-mail is of a confidential nature and is intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution by you is prohibited and may be unlawful. Disclosure to any party other than the addressee, whether inadvertent or otherwise is not intended to waive privilege or confidentiality. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 23:23:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 207A2394 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80871E1A for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 385F924D75 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:23:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s85NNRZA002723 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:23:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:23:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Column ruler (like line numbers) in vi / vim / gvim Message-Id: <20140906012327.3320bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:23:38 -0000 There is _one_ feature that I didn't find in vi / vim / gvim, and especially in regards of column-oriented data files, this would be really helpful: a real COLUMN RULER on top. I have "set number" and "set ruler" already in ~/.vimrc, but this involves too much "eye travel". I'd like to quickly see column numbers (on top) like I can see line numbers (on the left). As a grown-old mainframe person, I'm thinking about something like this: |...+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6 Something that you would recognize from ISPF/PDF. It could also look like this, like in SEU: ....+... 1 ...+... 2 ...+... 3 ...+... 4 ...+... 5 ...+... 6 Or even this: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0 The ruler should be located in the first line on top of the file, but not be part of the file. Is there a way to add this to gvim? Ideally it should accomodate to the "set nowrap" or "set wrap" setting (lines longer than the window width are either wrapped or scrolled horizontally). It should be shown on top of the current view (no matter how far you are into the file vertically). It should work similarly to the line numbers displayed on the left. Is it possible to achieve this without re-programming (g)vi(m) from scratch? :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 02:27:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01F1C2B for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 02:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stangl.us (stangl.us [66.93.193.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C621113 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 02:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scout.stangl.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514D517048 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:27:08 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stangl.us Received: from stangl.us ([127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (scout.stangl.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fhJqK1BlO6p5 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:26:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: by scout.stangl.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B962117046; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:26:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:26:58 -0500 From: Alex Stangl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Column ruler (like line numbers) in vi / vim / gvim Message-ID: <20140906022658.GA19618@scout.stangl.us> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20140906012327.3320bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140906012327.3320bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 02:27:16 -0000 On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:23:27AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > As a grown-old mainframe person, I'm thinking about something > like this: > > |...+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6 > Or even this: > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 > ----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0----+----0 > > The ruler should be located in the first line on top of the file, > but not be part of the file. Hi Polytropen, Check out http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Horizontal-Ruler-in-interface-td5590000.html I just tried the last suggestion on that page (from Christian Brabrandt) and it works great, and can be easily adapted to any of the formats you like. To make the ruler go away, you can type Ctrl-W o It's not clear how you want the ruler to work in wrap mode, so maybe that doesn't work as you like. Regards, Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 04:19:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA607BD2 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 04:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FBC41D12 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 04:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by bucksport.safeport.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8644vbH061341 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:04:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:04:57 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: pkg format change?? Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:04:57 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 04:19:11 -0000 I have a 9.2 system with 'FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898'. In trying to add a python module I can neither built it or do a pkg install. Building: pkg-static: Invalid manifest format: could not find expected ':' *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools27. *** [build-depends] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-MySQLdb. *** [stage] Error code 1 I found this: Bryan Drewery bdrewery at FreeBSD.org Thu Aug 14 15:01:08 UTC 2014 > This came up in #pkgng on freenode as well. Your Pkg is probably too > old. Check with 'pkg -v'. The current release is at 1.3.6 now. You're > likely running 1.1. Upgrade Pkg to support the new JSON format for the > manifest. Sure enough: pkg -v yields 1.1.4. My problem (if not already obvious) there is no way to update pkg. Build yields the same error. Neither 'pkg install' or pkg_add will work. I trust there was a good reason to make the format change mentioned above within a release and in such as way as to invalidate the package/port db on a working system.. This is not critical (for me) and is the reason I never do anything on a production system that I have not tested. This is my primary workstation, so I will just wait until I switch to 10.0 and rebuild from scratch. But really, an integral part of the system should be backward compatible with supported releases. _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 04:40:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B3D01BB for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 04:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A491F50 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 04:40:24 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,478,1406610000"; d="scan'208";a="75088485" Received: from nlpiport22.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.109]) by nlpiport08.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2014 23:40:29 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AugsAK+PClS9qohu/2dsb2JhbABagw2BKrADAQEBAQEBBoFLgimXNIUsAQECBAIBgQMXd4QEAQVWMwshExIPKh4ZiES/LgEXhXyJWBaENgWLNJE3AZUmhAEdL4JPAQEB Received: from dsl-189-170-136-110-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO morena.maps.net) ([189.170.136.110]) by nlpiport22.prodigy.net.mx with SMTP; 05 Sep 2014 23:40:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:40:22 -0700 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing problems .... Message-ID: <20140905214022.230255c3@morena.maps.net> In-Reply-To: <5407CF8D.3070007@hiwaay.net> References: <5400A209.7030103@hiwaay.net> <20140903191459.3f118c97@morena.maps.net> <5407CF8D.3070007@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i386-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 04:40:25 -0000 El Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:33:49 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" escribi=F3: >=20 > Still nogo, printer light comes on, it makes a bit of noise, but no=20 > output .... >=20 The light and noise occurs with all the destinations? rp=3Draw rp=3D rp=3Dlp From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 04:43:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12079261 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 04:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2A7A1F76 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 04:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817BB24816; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 06:43:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s864hn4e004518; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 06:43:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 06:43:49 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Alex Stangl Subject: Re: Column ruler (like line numbers) in vi / vim / gvim Message-Id: <20140906064349.32e55425.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140906022658.GA19618@scout.stangl.us> References: <20140906012327.3320bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140906022658.GA19618@scout.stangl.us> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 04:43:55 -0000 On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:26:58 -0500, Alex Stangl wrote: > Hi Polytropen, > > Check out > http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/Horizontal-Ruler-in-interface-td5590000.html > > I just tried the last suggestion on that page (from Christian Brabrandt) > and it works great, and can be easily adapted to any of the formats you > like. To make the ruler go away, you can type Ctrl-W o I had already found this, but it didn't work as intended. I found it in my local ~/.vim/plugin/ directory (deactivated). But it was an inspiration, so I came up with this idea which is 99% of what I was searching for: setl scrollbind scrollopt+=hor abo sp +enew call setline(1,' ....+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6....+....7....+....8....+....9....+....|') let &l:stl="%#Normal#".repeat(' ',winwidth(0)) res 1 setl scrollbind nomod buftype=nofile winfixheight nonumber nocursorline wincmd p First I had the original call setline(1,repeat('....+....|',20)) line (modified from 2nd to 1st line of the buffer) and then had a replacement orgy :1s/|/1/1 :1s/|/2/2 :1s/|/3/3 :1s/|/4/4 :1s/|/5/5 :1s/|/6/6 :1s/|/7/7 :1s/|/8/8 :1s/|/9/9 to replace the 1st | with 1, the 2nd with 2 and so on (up to 9). But then I thought: I can do this manually, it would be easier. :-) Maybe there's an expression for "search for the pattern P, and replace P with the number n, where n corresponds to the n-th instance of the pattern found". Maybe a regex wizard can tell me if this is possible? The spaces infront of the manually defined ruler represent the indentation for line numbers (which the buffer should not have). The spacing is for up to 999 lines, this is what vim aligns the numbers to (as in "%3d"). As you can see, the buffer also has an override for "set cursorline" which I have in my ~/.vimrc. Cosmetically I haven't found a way yet to remove the empty line between the buffer and the file to edit. Currently it looks like this (vim /usr/include/stdio.h): ....+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6....+....7....+. 1 /*- 2 * Copyright (c) 1990, 1993 3 * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > It's not clear how you want the ruler to work in wrap mode, > so maybe that doesn't work as you like. I didn't want the ruler in wrap mode - it wouldn't work. :-) Instead I had to "set nowrap" for any content edited which works nicely with the above solution: when scrolling the file horizontally, the buffers scrolls along. There is still one problem: The "wincmd p" doesn't seem to be executed, I have to manually use Ctrl+W p to be able to work with a file (instead with the ruler). Oh, and an additional quit command is to be used for the ruler (:q :q or :qa!), except I use the window manager's key combination to close the window (possible with gvim, but for vim inside a terminal, the whole terminal is closed). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 17:41:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B12A37 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com (mail-qa0-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6122D105A for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id w8so12311411qac.33 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:41:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=kMZ/QpypDcxAtqZMQ4kK+diSwOE+MCnksizQo3I8p8k=; b=RcMWdZ6NHaH2wIaq0Lx5A7uzXpbh2AGEJrmR/P6Txq7ro2u7Z2lWyCpfekxCk4TfJ2 DV7ZArS0OWdOI5qf2QE+DHFSv9v9JFafRZo8XNC0hPv1OzY8/DpyJih5V+UG5ThqFOpk 7XJghbK3dwTx06BeDNx1MNFo/WpxSX+F6h2QtYuobyj6sUUNIgyX8Be2toCxjUkcVi2w Rwz+D/lBJk9rkefXX817RWkE4SmLqej+C5xJjo69rGJeURDkqu7q9ZEe9lG2FjOtEJVv nO3ZgxFERCbHm6R6/a1XUy9E60BNMX4ejW7uOPEGiQXPKqCroWCjpBQR3fLH6Tc1MmCN fDLg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZ7KvmOhhasN4LVA6Me18Cgh3EVuENcz432d606zlNvWzjZLeGk+6d9zvpNPFrUPgE6qRi X-Received: by 10.224.98.207 with SMTP id r15mr9964214qan.23.1410025298817; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.65] ([96.236.21.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f4sm3669655qag.5.2014.09.06.10.41.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Column ruler (like line numbers) in vi / vim / gvim Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Paul Kraus In-Reply-To: <20140906012327.3320bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:41:37 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8721540F-1DD5-47AC-8492-A307A6381647@kraus-haus.org> References: <20140906012327.3320bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 17:41:46 -0000 On Sep 5, 2014, at 19:23, Polytropon wrote: > There is _one_ feature that I didn't find in vi / vim / gvim, > and especially in regards of column-oriented data files, this > would be really helpful: a real COLUMN RULER on top. I have > "set number" and "set ruler" already in ~/.vimrc, but this > involves too much "eye travel". I'd like to quickly see column > numbers (on top) like I can see line numbers (on the left). >=20 > As a grown-old mainframe person, I'm thinking about something > like this: >=20 > |...+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+=85.6 I have been cheating this for years, I use a line very much like the = above as a comment and separator when I am writing scripts :-) #=97=97=97=971=97=97=97=972=97=97=97=973=97=97=97=974=97=97=97=975=97=97=97= =976=97=97=97=977=97=97=97=978 -- Paul Kraus paul@kraus-haus.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 18:50:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F389BEA for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 18:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1181889 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 18:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s86IoXga050575 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:50:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <540B5779.9020706@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:50:33 -0600 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: missing lipmp3lame with openshot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:50:33 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 18:50:42 -0000 I'm trying out openshot to learn something about video editing. When I go to export, it claims: "The following codec(s) are missing from your system: libmp3lame" The openshot executable is statically linked, and there is a libmp3lame.a in /usr/local/lib, as a result of installing multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg, I think. Anyhoo, it's not clear to me exactly what the problem is, or how to go about finding out. I presume it is trying to dynamically load the library, or trapping an unresolved reference. I'm pretty rusty on ar and ld, so any hints would be appreciated. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 20:33:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B16566F for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E427712AE for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D9D746B52 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:33:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s86KX34f057475 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:33:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s86KX39Z057472 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:33:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:33:03 -0400 (EDT) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pkg format change?? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:33:03 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 20:33:04 -0000 On Sat, 6 Sep 2014, doug@safeport.com wrote: > I have a 9.2 system with 'FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898'. In trying to add a > python module I can neither built it or do a pkg install. > > Building: > > pkg-static: Invalid manifest format: could not find expected ':' > *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools27. > *** [build-depends] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/py-MySQLdb. > *** [stage] Error code 1 > > I found this: > > Bryan Drewery bdrewery at FreeBSD.org > Thu Aug 14 15:01:08 UTC 2014 > >> This came up in #pkgng on freenode as well. Your Pkg is probably too >> old. Check with 'pkg -v'. The current release is at 1.3.6 now. You're >> likely running 1.1. Upgrade Pkg to support the new JSON format for the >> manifest. > > Sure enough: pkg -v yields 1.1.4. My problem (if not already obvious) there > is no way to update pkg. Build yields the same error. Neither 'pkg install' > or pkg_add will work. I trust there was a good reason to make the format > change mentioned above within a release and in such as way as to invalidate > the package/port db on a working system.. > > This is not critical (for me) and is the reason I never do anything on a > production system that I have not tested. This is my primary workstation, so > I will just wait until I switch to 10.0 and rebuild from scratch. But really, > an integral part of the system should be backward compatible with supported > releases. Okay another day+5 hours of sleep+ a cup of tea. I got pkg.conf from a 9.3 system: #ABI = "freebsd:10:x86:64"; # Autogenerated #DEVELOPER_MODE = false; #VULNXML_SITE = "http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/vuln.xml.bz2"; #FETCH_RETRY = 3; #PKG_PLUGINS_DIR = "/usr/local/lib/pkg/"; #PKG_ENABLE_PLUGINS = true; #PLUGINS [ #] #DEBUG_SCRIPTS = false; #PLUGINS_CONF_DIR = "/usr/local/etc/pkg/"; #PERMISSIVE = false; #REPO_AUTOUPDATE = true; #NAMESERVER = ""; #EVENT_PIPE = ""; #FETCH_TIMEOUT = 30; #UNSET_TIMESTAMP = false; #SSH_RESTRICT_DIR = ""; #PKG_ENV { #} #DISABLE_MTREE = false; #PKG_SSH_ARGS = ""; #DEBUG_LEVEL = 0; #ALIAS { #} #CUDF_SOLVER = ""; #SAT_SOLVER = ""; #RUN_SCRIPTS = true; #CASE_SENSITIVE_MATCH = false; # Sample alias settings ALIAS : { all-depends: query %dn-%dv, annotations: info -A, build-depends: info -qd, download: fetch, iinfo: info -ix, cinfo: info -Cx, isearch: search -ix, csearch: search -Cx, leaf: query -e "%a == 0" "%n-%v", list: info -ql, origin: info -qo, provided-depends: info -qb, raw: info -R, required-depends: info -qr, shared-depends: info -qB, show: info -f -k, size: info -sq, } This is pkg.conf.sample. Unmodified, it works. My workstation did not have this version, perhaps if I had first run freebsd-update. All is good, I was able to deinstall and reinstall pkg doing the standard stuff. I further tested the setup by installing the port that led to this. I am not sure I have a suggestion to make this better, perhaps just point toward pkg.conf.sample as the solution. I got nothing out of the man page. Doug Denault From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 22:05:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294E6C0E for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 22:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76131BB4 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 22:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XQO6E-0000it-OO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 00:04:50 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 00:04:50 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 00:04:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: missing lipmp3lame with openshot Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 18:04:37 -0400 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <540B5779.9020706@dreamchaser.org> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:05:01 -0000 Gary Aitken wrote: > I'm trying out openshot to learn something about video editing. > When I go to export, it claims: > "The following codec(s) are missing from your system: > libmp3lame" > > The openshot executable is statically linked, and there is a libmp3lame.a > in /usr/local/lib, as a result of installing multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg, > I think. > > Anyhoo, it's not clear to me exactly what the problem is, or how to go > about > finding out. I presume it is trying to dynamically load the library, or > trapping an unresolved reference. I'm pretty rusty on ar and ld, so any > hints would be appreciated. > > Gary Note the dependency for lame-3.99.5_1 in the list below: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=openshot&stype=all&sektion=all Below shows some pertinent info: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/audio/lame/pkg-plist?revision=354227&view=markup Looks like you need to install lame: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^lame-3.99.5_1&stype=name You can also look at the binary by cd /path/to and ldd whateverbinary. This will tell you what libs it was built against. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 22:37:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1673EF for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 22:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98E151E17 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 22:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s86MbVwL051136; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:37:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <540B8CAB.5090801@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:37:31 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nightrecon@hotmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: missing lipmp3lame with openshot References: <540B5779.9020706@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:37:31 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:37:35 -0000 On 09/06/14 16:04, Michael Powell wrote: > Gary Aitken wrote: > >> I'm trying out openshot to learn something about video editing. >> When I go to export, it claims: "The following codec(s) are missing >> from your system: libmp3lame" >> >> The openshot executable is statically linked, and there is a >> libmp3lame.a in /usr/local/lib, as a result of installing >> multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg, I think. >> >> Anyhoo, it's not clear to me exactly what the problem is, or how to >> go about finding out. I presume it is trying to dynamically load >> the library, or trapping an unresolved reference. I'm pretty rusty >> on ar and ld, so any hints would be appreciated. >> >> Gary > > Note the dependency for lame-3.99.5_1 in the list below: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=openshot&stype=all&sektion=all > > Below shows some pertinent info: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/audio/lame/pkg-plist?revision=354227&view=markup > > Looks like you need to install lame: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^lame-3.99.5_1&stype=name > > You can also look at the binary by cd /path/to and ldd > whateverbinary. This will tell you what libs it was built against. I built using "portmaster multimedia/openshot" and ended up with a static executable, which surprises me. I don't see anything in the Makefile to indicate that. Is there an easy way to force a dynamic build in this case? I've got lame-3.99.5_1 installed: ~$ pkg info | grep lame lame-3.99.5_1 Fast MP3 encoder kit twolame-0.3.13_3 MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoder ~$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/* | grep lame -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 423218 May 19 00:35 /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 939 May 19 00:35 /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.la lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 May 19 00:35 /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.so -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 May 19 00:35 /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 287312 May 19 00:35 /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 180734 Sep 4 14:35 /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Sep 4 14:35 /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.so -> libtwolame.so.0.0.0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Sep 4 14:35 /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.so.0 -> libtwolame.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 132931 Sep 4 14:35 /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.so.0.0.0 other ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 23:25:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0CD2DB for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3510712BD for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XQPMO-0006QE-6w for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:25:36 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:25:36 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:25:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: missing lipmp3lame with openshot Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 19:25:23 -0400 Lines: 80 Message-ID: References: <540B5779.9020706@dreamchaser.org> <540B8CAB.5090801@dreamchaser.org> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:25:40 -0000 Gary Aitken wrote: > On 09/06/14 16:04, Michael Powell wrote: >> Gary Aitken wrote: >> >>> I'm trying out openshot to learn something about video editing. >>> When I go to export, it claims: "The following codec(s) are missing >>> from your system: libmp3lame" >>> >>> The openshot executable is statically linked, and there is a >>> libmp3lame.a in /usr/local/lib, as a result of installing >>> multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg, I think. >>> >>> Anyhoo, it's not clear to me exactly what the problem is, or how to >>> go about finding out. I presume it is trying to dynamically load >>> the library, or trapping an unresolved reference. I'm pretty rusty >>> on ar and ld, so any hints would be appreciated. >>> >>> Gary >> >> Note the dependency for lame-3.99.5_1 in the list below: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=openshot&stype=all&sektion=all >> >> Below shows some pertinent info: >> >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/audio/lame/pkg-plist?revision=354227&view=markup >> >> Looks like you need to install lame: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^lame-3.99.5_1&stype=name >> >> You can also look at the binary by cd /path/to and ldd >> whateverbinary. This will tell you what libs it was built against. > > I built using "portmaster multimedia/openshot" and ended up with a static > executable, which surprises me. I don't see anything in the Makefile to > indicate that. > Is there an easy way to force a dynamic build in this case? > > I've got lame-3.99.5_1 installed: > ~$ pkg info | grep lame > lame-3.99.5_1 Fast MP3 encoder kit > twolame-0.3.13_3 MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoder > > ~$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/* | grep lame > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 423218 May 19 00:35 > /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.a > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 939 May 19 00:35 > /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.la > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 May 19 00:35 > /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.so -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 May 19 00:35 > /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 287312 May 19 00:35 > /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 180734 Sep 4 14:35 > /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Sep 4 14:35 > /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.so -> libtwolame.so.0.0.0 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Sep 4 14:35 > /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.so.0 -> libtwolame.so.0.0.0 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 132931 Sep 4 14:35 > /usr/local/lib/libtwolame.so.0.0.0 > > other ideas? Not much of any, per se. The above would seem to indicate that it did build against libmp3lame. At this juncture the only thing I'm left wondering about is which system, e.g is this a problem wrt to 9.x still using a really old GCC or is it a 10.x situation which has changed to Clang. From what little I know I believe that the ports build guys tried to go through the ports tree and winnow out for further work those which failed to build, or otherwise had some trouble building with Clang. I seem to recall they wanted reports of such at the time. Don't know if this has any bearing on this particular case, it's just all I can think of... -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 23:30:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B658643A for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FEFD1368 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XQPRT-0001dy-Py for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:30:51 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:30:51 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:30:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: missing lipmp3lame with openshot Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 19:30:38 -0400 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <540B5779.9020706@dreamchaser.org> <540B8CAB.5090801@dreamchaser.org> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:30:54 -0000 Michael Powell wrote: > Gary Aitken wrote: > [snip] >> other ideas? > > Not much of any, per se. The above would seem to indicate that it did > build against libmp3lame. At this juncture the only thing I'm left > wondering about is which system, e.g is this a problem wrt to 9.x still > using a really old GCC or is it a 10.x situation which has changed to > Clang. From what little I know I believe that the ports build guys tried > to go through the ports tree > and winnow out for further work those which failed to build, or otherwise > had some trouble building with Clang. I seem to recall they wanted reports > of such at the time. Don't know if this has any bearing on this particular > case, it's just all I can think of... > > -Mike > The only other thing (which I forgot to include) is I have never used portmaster and essentially nothing about it. Perhaps if a manual build were to succeed in building it properly it might indicate the problem is in portmaster somehow? -Mike