From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 14:38:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F9216A41A for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from snipe.secure-computing.net (snipe.secure-computing.net [209.240.66.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3065A13C4D9 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from swordfish.local.claimlynx.com (unknown [74.95.66.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ecrist@secure-computing.net) by snipe.secure-computing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C689617053 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:30:31 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <34F952F8-AEB5-4C13-9E3B-09105AA31B38@secure-computing.net> From: Eric F Crist To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v912) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:30:29 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.912) Subject: IPFW2 woes... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:38:12 -0000 Hey all, I've written a short IPFW ruleset, with only some count rules and one allow all ip rule. I've got the following entries in my /etc/rc.conf file: # IPFW Settings # Only used for traffic accounting! firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.sh" Every time this system boots, it asks if I'm sure if I want the divert daemon enabled? The answer, really, is NO. pf is doing all that for me, I'm just using IPFW for packet accounting. The message changes slightly if I add natd_enable="NO" to the file. Why is it asking me this, and what do I need to do to make it go away!? Thanks! ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks