Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:41:27 +0900
From:      Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To:        sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Hi. /31 on ethernet links
Message-ID:  <m2fx8zzvzc.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091031.110837.41706473.sthaug@nethelp.no>
References:  <4AEB834D.1050907@keff.org> <20091031.090152.74670981.sthaug@nethelp.no> <m2iqdvzy1x.wl%randy@psg.com> <20091031.110837.41706473.sthaug@nethelp.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> However, I was simply reacting to the claim that it was *supported* by
> Cisco.

have you noticed a difference in the bug rate between things that are
'supported by cisco' and those that just happen to be there?  :)

but you're right.  i liked.  our p2ps are /30s, not /31s.  and we're
moving from /126 to /127.

randy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2fx8zzvzc.wl%randy>