Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:16:32 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes Message-ID: <400D4650.1090706@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <400D4217.4090901@ciam.ru> References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <400D4217.4090901@ciam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>
>> Sorry for stepping up so late, but this saves options under
>> ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/options
>>
>> Lots of ports have the same PORTNAME (ie 'openldap' for
>> net/openldap2[012]-(client|server), 'apache' for russian/apache13,
>> www/apache(13|13-fp|2|21)). Some conflict, but -client/-server don't.
>> Either each port has to set OPTIONSFILE to
>> ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/something,
>> or we may use LATEST_LINK instead of PORTNAME:
>
> Why don't you think we could use ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PKGNAME} instead?
> PKGNAME has no conflicts.
Won't survive a version bump, which is what this is all about, I guess.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?400D4650.1090706>