Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 09:35:29 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@freebsd-services.com> To: itojun@iijlab.net Cc: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, snap-users@kame.net, Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <s-shino@kt.rim.or.jp>, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, brian@freebsd-services.com Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 5335) Re: user-ppp assigns the address same with already assigned for other clients Message-ID: <200109040835.f848ZT259676@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from itojun@iijlab.net of "Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:24:00 %2B0900." <21829.999591840@itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> >> since KAME have never touched pppd for years, I don't think it
> >> is related to kame.
> >
> >KAME has not touched pppd, but Brian mentions later on in his message
> >that he thinks that the problem might be caused by the SIOCAIFADDR
> >ioctl, which was currently implemented using the SIOCAIFADDR_IN6
> >ioctl during a KAME merge.
>
> you can't add IPv4 address with SIOCAIFADDR_IN6.
Yes, so it seems. I was confused by the SIOCALIFADDR ioctl in
netinet/in.c. My apologies.
> itojun
It appears that the problem is local to FreeBSD then. I'll look into
it some more.
--
Brian <brian@freebsd-services.com> <brian@Awfulhak.org>
http://www.freebsd-services.com/ <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109040835.f848ZT259676>